Community Nursing assignment
|
Criteria Percentage |
Superior 100 – 93 |
Excellent 92 – 85 |
Satisfactory 84 – 78 |
Unsatisfactory 77 |
Incomplete 0 |
|
Windshield Survey elements are included.
5% |
Windshield Survey data is presented, including community boundaries, core, and 4 subsystems that include Education and Health & Social Services. |
Windshield Survey data is presented with one element missing (community boundaries, core), and 4 subsystems that include Education and Health & Social Services. |
Windshield Survey data is presented with more than one element missing (community boundaries, core), and 4 subsystems that include Education and Health & Social Services. |
Windshield Survey data is presented with all elements missing (community boundaries, core), and 4 subsystems that do not include Education and Health & Social Services. |
No Windshield Survey data is included. No subsystems are included. |
|
Disaster Preparedness Plan is included, and 4 stages of disaster response are identified.
5% |
Community’s disaster preparedness plan is included. All 4 stages of disaster response are included and described. |
Community’s disaster preparedness plan is included. 3 stages of disaster response are included and described. |
Community’s disaster preparedness plan is included. 1-2 stages of disaster response are included and identified. |
Community’s disaster preparedness plan is included. No stages of disaster response are included or identified.
|
Community’s disaster plan is not included. |
|
Two Community Nursing Diagnoses are identified and ranked using ethical principles in health care 20% |
The 2 Community Nursing Diagnoses are complete, correctly formatted, and ranked.
|
The 2 Community Nursing Diagnoses are complete, correctly formatted, with minor errors in ranking. |
The 2Community Nursing Diagnoses are complete with minor errors in the formatting and ranking.
|
The 2 Community Nursing Diagnoses are incomplete and/or incorrectly formatted and ranked.
|
Did not identify any Community Nursing Diagnoses. Less than 2 Community Nursing Diagnoses identified. |
|
Rationale for ranking community nursing diagnoses is presented.
5% |
Rationale is based on the ethical principles in health care and is explained logically and applicably. |
Rationale is based on the ethical principles in health care and explained with minor errors in judgment. |
Rationale is based on the ethical principles in health care but is not appropriately explained. |
Rationale is not based on the ethical principles in health care. |
No rationale is presented. |
|
Two expected outcomes for the top two identified Community Nursing Diagnoses are presented.
10% |
Expected outcomes are realistic, specifically measurable, realistic, and easily attainable. |
Expected outcomes are correctly formatted, measurable, and realistic. |
Expected outcomes are correctly formatted, somewhat measurable, but not realistic. |
Expected outcomes are incorrectly formatted, not measurable, or are not realistic. |
No expected outcomes are presented.
|
|
Intervention activities and/or strategies to accomplish two identified top outcomes are presented and discussed.
10% |
Interventions/ strategies are thoroughly detailed and extremely well chosen.
Evidence is used to support interventions and is thoroughly detailed. |
Interventions/ strategies are adequate in detail and appropriately selected.
Evidence is used to support interventions/ strategies and is adequate in detail. |
Interventions/ strategies are adequate in detail and some may be inappropriately chosen.
Evidence used to support interventions/ strategies and is adequate in detail. |
Some interventions/ strategies are inappropriately selected.
Evidence is used to support interventions/ strategies, but it is inadequate in detail. |
No intervention activities/ strategies are presented.
No evidence is used to support interventions/ strategies. |
|
Two evaluation strategies for the proposed intervention activities are presented.
10% |
Evaluation strategies are based on information that is taken from source(s) with enough evaluative interpretation to support the evaluation methods. |
Evaluation strategies are based on some of the evidence to support the evaluation methods. |
Evaluation strategies are based on minimal evidence to support the evaluation methods. |
Evaluation strategies do not include evidence to support evaluation the methods. |
No evaluation strategies are presented. |
|
Reflections on the inter-dependence of your current professional clinical practice and community health nursing.
10% |
Reflections are based on logical conclusions that are generated from the findings of the community and are solidly related to the interdependence of current practice. |
Reflections arise specifically from the findings of the community. Reflections are adequate relating to the inter-dependence of current practice. |
Reflections are general and beyond the scope of the findings of the community. Minimal reflections relating to the inter-dependence to current practice. |
Reflections are an ambiguous, illogical, or an unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings of the community. |
No reflections on the inter-dependence of your current practice and community health nursing.
|
|
Speaker’s Notes.
15% |
Speaker’s notes exceed expectations and demonstrate a superior understanding of textbook material and include at least two or more external resources. |
Speaker’s notes meet expectations and demonstrate an excellent understanding of textbook material and include at least one external resource. |
Speaker’s notes meet expectations and demonstrate an adequate understanding of textbook material.
|
Speaker’s notes do not meet expectations and/or demonstrate a minimal understanding of textbook material.
|
No speaker’s notes are presented. |
|
Readability & Slide Design 5% |
Slides have a readable font with no more than 5 bulleted points. Graphics/ pictures enrich presentation. |
Slides have a readable font with 6 bulleted points. Graphics/pictures enhance presentation. |
Slides have a readable font with more than 6 bulleted points. Graphics/pictures slightly enhance presentation. |
Slides have unreadable font due to number of bulleted points. Graphics/pictures detract from presentation. |
Slides are visually difficult to read. No graphics/ pictures are included in presentation. |
|
Spelling, Grammar, and/or Syntax, APA Format
5% |
No spelling, grammar, and/ or syntax errors noted. No APA errors in presentation. |
1 spelling, grammar, and/or syntax error noted. 1 APA error in presentation. |
2 spelling, grammar, and/or syntax errors noted. 2 APA errors in presentation. |
3 spelling, grammar, and/or syntax errors noted. 3 APA errors in presentation. |
4 or more spelling, grammar, and/or syntax errors noted. 4 or more APA errors in presentation. |