Community Nursing assignment

profileNurseyNurse77
powerpointrubric.docx

Criteria Percentage

Superior

100 – 93

Excellent

92 – 85

Satisfactory

84 – 78

Unsatisfactory

77

Incomplete

0

Windshield Survey elements are included.

5%

Windshield Survey data is presented, including community boundaries, core, and 4 subsystems that include Education and Health & Social Services.

Windshield Survey data is presented with one element missing (community boundaries, core), and 4 subsystems that include Education and Health & Social Services.

Windshield Survey data is presented with more than one element missing (community boundaries, core), and 4 subsystems that include Education and Health & Social Services.

Windshield Survey data is presented with all elements missing (community boundaries, core), and 4 subsystems that do not include Education and Health & Social Services.

No Windshield Survey data is included. No subsystems are included.

Disaster Preparedness Plan is included, and 4 stages of disaster response are identified.

5%

Community’s disaster preparedness plan is included. All 4 stages of disaster response are included and described.

Community’s disaster preparedness plan is included. 3 stages of disaster response are included and described.

Community’s disaster preparedness plan is included. 1-2 stages of disaster response are included and identified.

Community’s disaster preparedness plan is included. No stages of disaster response are included or identified.

Community’s disaster plan is not included.

Two Community Nursing Diagnoses are identified and ranked using ethical principles in health care

20%

The 2 Community Nursing Diagnoses are complete, correctly formatted, and ranked.

The 2 Community Nursing Diagnoses are complete, correctly formatted, with minor errors in ranking.

The 2Community Nursing Diagnoses are complete with minor errors in the formatting and ranking.

The 2 Community Nursing Diagnoses are incomplete and/or incorrectly formatted and ranked.

Did not identify any Community Nursing Diagnoses.

Less than 2 Community Nursing Diagnoses identified.

Rationale for ranking community nursing diagnoses is presented.

5%

Rationale is based on the ethical principles in health care and is explained logically and applicably.

Rationale is based on the ethical principles in health care and explained with minor errors in judgment.

Rationale is based on the ethical principles in health care but is not appropriately explained.

Rationale is not based on the ethical principles in health care.

No rationale is presented.

Two expected outcomes for the top two identified Community Nursing Diagnoses are presented.

10%

Expected outcomes are realistic, specifically measurable, realistic, and easily attainable.

Expected outcomes are correctly formatted, measurable, and realistic.

Expected outcomes are correctly formatted, somewhat measurable, but not realistic.

Expected outcomes are incorrectly formatted, not measurable, or are not realistic.

No expected outcomes

are presented.

Intervention activities and/or strategies to accomplish two identified top outcomes are presented and discussed.

10%

Interventions/ strategies are thoroughly detailed and extremely well chosen.

Evidence is used to support interventions and is thoroughly detailed.

Interventions/

strategies are adequate in detail and appropriately selected.

Evidence is used to support interventions/

strategies and is adequate in detail.

Interventions/

strategies are adequate in detail and some may be inappropriately chosen.

Evidence used to support interventions/

strategies and is adequate in detail.

Some interventions/ strategies are inappropriately selected.

Evidence is used to support interventions/ strategies, but it is inadequate in detail.

No intervention activities/ strategies are presented.

No

evidence is used to support interventions/

strategies.

Two evaluation strategies for the proposed intervention activities are presented.

10%

Evaluation strategies are based on information that is taken from source(s) with enough evaluative interpretation to support the evaluation methods.

Evaluation strategies are based on some of the evidence to support the evaluation methods.

Evaluation strategies are based on minimal evidence to support the evaluation methods.

Evaluation strategies do not include evidence to support evaluation the methods.

No evaluation strategies are presented.

Reflections on the inter-dependence of your current

professional clinical practice and community health nursing.

10%

Reflections are based on logical conclusions that are generated from the findings of the community and are solidly related to the interdependence of current practice.

Reflections arise

specifically from the findings of the community. Reflections are adequate relating to the inter-dependence of current practice.

Reflections are general and beyond the scope of the findings of the community.

Minimal reflections relating to the inter-dependence to current practice.

Reflections are an ambiguous, illogical, or an unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings of the community.

No reflections on the inter-dependence of your current practice and community health nursing.

Speaker’s Notes.

15%

Speaker’s notes exceed expectations and demonstrate a superior understanding of textbook material and include at least two or more external resources.

Speaker’s notes meet expectations and demonstrate an excellent understanding of textbook material and include at least one external resource.

Speaker’s notes meet expectations and demonstrate an adequate understanding of textbook material.

Speaker’s notes do not meet expectations and/or

demonstrate a minimal understanding of textbook material.

No speaker’s notes are presented.

Readability & Slide Design

5%

Slides have a readable font with no more than 5 bulleted points. Graphics/ pictures enrich presentation.

Slides have a readable font with 6 bulleted points. Graphics/pictures enhance presentation.

Slides have a readable font with more than 6 bulleted points. Graphics/pictures slightly enhance presentation.

Slides have unreadable font due to number of bulleted points. Graphics/pictures detract from presentation.

Slides are visually difficult to read. No graphics/ pictures are included in presentation.

Spelling, Grammar, and/or Syntax, APA Format

5%

No spelling, grammar, and/ or syntax errors noted. No APA errors in presentation.

1 spelling, grammar, and/or syntax error noted. 1 APA error in presentation.

2 spelling, grammar, and/or syntax errors noted. 2 APA errors in presentation.

3 spelling, grammar, and/or syntax errors noted. 3 APA errors in presentation.

4 or more

spelling, grammar, and/or syntax errors noted. 4 or more APA errors in presentation.