write a 2 pages outline

I.

II. INTRODUCTION

A. Morally justifiable within a consequentialist framework. Disproportionately affects minority populations and those with mental health issues.

B. Abolishing the death penalty is an act of courage, justice, and compassion.

III. BODY

1. Body Part 1

A. Morally justifiable within a consequentialist framework: Abolishing the death penalty is morally justifiable when evaluated via the Consequentialist Framework, which looks at the results of an action.

B. Disproportionately affects minority populations and those with mental health issues: Executing a mentally ill person violates their human rights and is a moral outrage. Executing someone because of their ethnicity or socioeconomic situation is also unjust.

C. Abolishing the death penalty is an act of courage, justice, and compassion: When evaluated through the Virtue Framework, my viewpoint is ethical since it is a brave and just act to defend the weak and campaign for a society that respects and protects human life and the rule of law.

2. Body Part 2

A. Argument from consequence: Some argue that the death sentence is the best way to discourage criminal behavior and protect society from violent offenders.

B. Argument from duty: For others, the death penalty is a means to an end that will provide them peace of mind and justice.

C. Argument from virtue: Finally, some may argue that retributive justice and compassion for victims require the use of the death sentence.

3. Body Part 3

A. Utilitarian and deontological frameworks: I may use the utilitarian and deontological frameworks, emphasizing the results of our acts and our duties to others.

B. Virtue Framework: The virtue framework is another source of inspiration for me; it stresses the value of fairness, kindness, and charity.

C. Illustrative cases: I may provide examples of how the death sentence violates the principles outlined in these ethical theories.

IV. CONCLUSION

A. Abolishing the death penalty is essential for justice and life: Recognizing the moral implications of murdering innocent individuals and punishing specific communities disproportionately is crucial when considering the death sentence's ethical implications.

B. Potential for conflicting moral views: There is a possibility that my moral stance on the death penalty will disagree with the moral perspectives of others because it is based on a distinct set of ethical principles and values.

C. Incorporating ethical decision-making elements: By offering alternative ethical frameworks and values and giving instances of how the death penalty falls short of meeting the needs of each framework, my position paper argument has the potential to contain ethical decision-making components that go beyond my initial values and views.

2