Portfolio Rubric-Journal
Master of Arts in Teaching Program (MAT)
Portfolio/Journal-Grading Rubric
Student: Score:
|
Category |
Criteria |
High Proficiency
3 |
Proficiency
2 |
No/Limited Proficiency 1 |
|
Vita/Resume |
Portfolio includes a page vita that clearly presents the education and experience of candidate |
Vita follows the guidelines available in the criteria |
Vita lacks key elements or is formatted in a way that makes it difficult to identify |
Vita has several spelling or grammar errors for is missing |
|
Philosophy of Teaching |
Portfolio includes a 1 to 2-page description of an educational vision that clearly presents the beliefs of candidate |
Philosophy is clear and compelling—no grammatical or spelling errors |
Philosophy is adequately developed--few grammatical or spelling errors |
Philosophy is poorly developed or missing-- many grammatical or spelling errors |
|
Syllabus |
A syllabus for a courses being taught |
Well developed |
Adequate |
Incomplete |
|
Clear professional format |
Cover page, Table of Contents, dividers, make materials accessible and easy to read |
Portfolio contains a cover page with name and contact information, dividers are visible and readable, TOC directs reader to each section |
All elements are present, but lack clarity |
Some elements missing |
|
Selection/Teaching Artifacts |
Lecture notes, assignments, projects, visuals, quizzes, assessments, PowerPoints, |
Well developed |
Adequate |
Incomplete |
|
Weekly Reflections |
All reflections clearly describe why artifacts in demonstrate achievement |
Most of the reflections describe why artifacts demonstrate achievement of each standard |
A few reflections describe why artifacts in demonstrate achievement of each standard |
No reflections describe why artifacts in the demonstrate achievement of each standard |
|
Evidence of effectiveness |
Student evaluations, teaching awards, reflections or plans for gathering student |
Well developed |
Adequate |
Incomplete |
|
Professional Developments attended |
Indications of or plans for continuing professional development—courses, workshops, professional organizations, reading lists. |
Well developed |
Adequate |
Incomplete |
|
Technology |
Portfolio includes an organized list of websites for articles |
At least 10 websites. Each site is briefly annotated to explain relevance and value |
At least 5. Some sites are briefly annotated to explain relevance and value |
Unorganized list of websites |
|
Total Score:
/27 |
|
|
|
|