Module 1 Reflection help
Ethical Dilemmas and Decisions in
Criminal Justice Tenth Edition
Chapter 3 Justice and Law
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Learning Objectives
1. Describe the three themes included in the definition of
justice.
2. Define Aristotle’s distributive and corrective justice.
3. Distinguish between substantive and procedural
justice, including how procedural justice impacts
wrongful convictions and perceptions of racial
discrimination.
4. Explain the concept of restorative justice and the
programs associated with it.
5. Describe civil disobedience and when it may be
appropriate.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Introduction
• Three themes when discussing justice:
– Fairness
– Equality
– Impartiality
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Origins of the Concept of Justice
• The concept of justice originates in the Greek word dike,
which refers to everything staying in its proper place.
• Plato believed justice was achieved by maintaining the
social status quo. He classed it as one of the four civic
virtues (along with wisdom, temperance, and courage).
• Aristotle believed justice was the basis of law, defining it
as the unwritten customs of a people that distinguish
between what is and is not honorable.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Distributive Justice (1 of 4)
Justice involves rightful possession of:
Economic goods (income or property)
• Opportunities for development (education or
citizenship)
• Recognition (honor or status)
Since some possessions are scarce, justice requires that
goods be distributed using standards of entitlement such
as need and desert.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Distributive Justice (2 of 4)
Various theories can be categorized as:
• Egalitarian theories
• Marxist theories
• Libertarian theories
• Utilitarian theories
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Distributive Justice (3 of 4)
Rawl’s theory of justice:
• Each person is to have an equal right to the most
extensive total system of basic liberties compatible with
a similar system of liberty for all.
• Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so
that they are both reasonably expected to be to
everyone’s advantage and attached to positions and
offices open to all.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Distributive Justice (4 of 4)
Criticisms of Rawls
• The veil of ignorance cannot counteract human
selfishness and self-interest.
• Preferring the least well-off is bad for a society; leads
to lack of incentive, decline of standards.
• Rawls’s approach to distribution ignores desert and
merit.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Corrective Justice (1 of 4)
• Substantive justice: refers to issues of inherent fairness
– Retributive justice: balance
▪ Concept of mercy
▪ Sanctuary allows a person respite from punishment
within the confines of church grounds.
– Utilitarian justice: only supports punishment if it benefits
society
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Corrective Justice (2 of 4)
• Procedural justice: steps taken to reach determination
of guilt or punishment
– Herrera v. Collins (1993)
– In re Troy Anthony Davis (2009)
– Holland v. Florida (2010)
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Corrective Justice (3 of 4)
Procedural Protections
• Notice of charges
• Neutral hearing body
• Right of cross-examination
• Right to present evidence
• Representation by counsel
• Statement of findings
• Appeal
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Corrective Justice (4 of 4)
• Procedural justice research
– Illustrates importance of procedural justice as it affects
legitimacy of entire justice system
– Elements of procedural justice:
▪ Voice
▪ Neutrality
▪ Respect
▪ Trustworthiness
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Wrongful Convictions (1 of 2)
• One reason people distrust justice system
• National registry of false convictions created by
University of Michigan Law School and Center on
Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University
School of Law
• Innocence Project
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Wrongful Convictions (2 of 2)
• Reasons for false convictions
– Defense lawyers’ incompetence
– Suppression of exculpatory evidence
– False/mistaken eyewitness identification
– Invalid forensic science
– Informant/jailhouse informant perjured testimony
– Government misconduct
– Bad lawyering
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Race, Ethnicity, and Justice
• Perceptions of blacks and whites differ regarding the criminal justice system.
• Race permeates the criminal justice system.
– Disproportional representation of blacks in certain crime categories
– Racial profiling by police
– Lack of access to competent attorneys
– Disparate sentencing
• Blacks disproportionately responsible for crime, leads to:
– Racial profiling
– Saturation patrols
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Restorative Justice
• Emphasizes compensation over retribution
• Returns focus to rights and needs of the victim
• Requires restoration of victims, offenders, and
communities injured by crime
• Integrates victims, offenders, and communities more
into the justice process
• Leaves government responsible for order, but makes
community responsible for peace
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Immoral Laws and the Moral
Person (1 of 2)
• Immoral laws deprive certain groups of liberty or treat
some groups differently, giving them either more or
fewer rights and privileges than other groups.
• Unjust laws have the following characteristics:
– They are degrading to humans.
– They are discriminatory against certain groups.
– They are enacted by unrepresentative authorities.
– They are unjustly applied.
• Most ethical systems condemn such laws.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Immoral Laws and the Moral
Person (2 of 2)
• Civil disobedience: voluntary disobedience of
established laws
• Milgram experiments
• Widespread belief that law is synonymous with morality
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Discussion Questions
1. How do the Egalitarian, Marxist, Libertarian, and
Utilitarian theories apply to the wide disparities in
salaries found in the United States? See Box 3.1 for
CEO salary examples.
2. Explain your thoughts on media coverage of police
shootings with respect to the race of the shooters. Do
media outlets cover incidents differently?
3. Can you think of a scenario in which restorative justice
would not be the best approach? Why?