Developing and Testing Self-Report Scales & Descriptive Statistics in nursing

profileirisdiaz1511
Polit10e_PPT_Ch15.ppt

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Chapter 15

Developing and Testing Self-Report Scales

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Question

Tell whether the following statement is true or false:

Scale development begins with a sound conceptualization of the construct (the latent variable) to be measured, excluding its dimensionality.

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Answer

False

Scale development begins with a sound conceptualization of the construct (the latent variable) to be measured, including its dimensionality.

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Conceptualizing the Construct

  • Scale development begins with a sound conceptualization of the construct (the latent trait) to be measured, including its dimensionality.
  • Unobservable latent trait
  • Unidimensional

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Type of Scale

  • Scale selection is done before items can be generated.

Two broad categories of multi-item reflective scales

  • Traditional summated rating (Likert)
  • Latent trait

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Generating Item Pool

  • Sources
  • Existing instruments
  • Research literature
  • Concept analyses
  • In-depth studies
  • Clinical observations

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Decisions about Item Features

  • Number of items
  • Response items
  • Positive and negative stems
  • Item intensity
  • Item time frames

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Number of Items

  • Domain sampling model: homogeneous set of items from a hypothetical universe of items
  • Goal is to provide appropriate redundancy so idiosyncrasies can be cancelled out.
  • Recommends starting with 3 to 4 times as many items as you will have in your final scale

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Response Options

  • Scale items contain:
  • A stem
  • Response options
  • For example, strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Positive and Negative Stems

  • The objective was to include items that would minimize the possibility of an acquiescence response set—the tendency to agree with statements regardless of their content.
  • Many experts currently advise again including negative and positive items on a scale.

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Item Intensity

  • The intensity of the statements (stems) should be similar and fairly strongly worded.
  • Statements should not be so extremely worded as to result in universal rejection.

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Item Time Frames

  • A time frame should not emerge as a consequence of item development.
  • It should be decided upon in advance, based on the conceptual understanding of the construct and the needs for which the scale is being constructed.

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Wording the Items—Readability

  • Clarity
  • Jargon
  • Length
  • Double negatives
  • Double-barreled items

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Question

Once content validity has been established at a satisfactory level, the scale must be administered to a development sample. What is the typical number of respondents who are representative of the target population?

100

150

250

300

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Answer

D

Once content validity has been established at a satisfactory level, the scale must be administered to a development sample—typically 300 or more respondents who are representative of the target population.

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Content Validity

  • Satisfactory level
  • Development sample
  • 300 or more respondents representative of target population

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Field Testing the Instrument

  • Developing the sampling plan
  • Developing a data collection plan
  • Preparing for data collection

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Question

Tell whether the following statement is true or false:

Exploratory factor analysis is used to reduce a small set of variables into a larger set of underlying dimensions, called factors.

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Answer

False

Exploratory factor analysis is used to reduce a large set of variables into a smaller set of underlying dimensions, called factors.

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Analysis of Scale Development Data

Basic item analysis

  • Inter-item correlation
  • Item–scale correlations

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA)

  • Factor extraction
  • Principal components analysis (PCA)
  • Factor rotation—orthogonal or oblique

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Illustration of Factor Rotation

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Scale Refinement and Validation

  • Revising the scale
  • Scoring the scale
  • Conducting a validation study

Confirmatory factor analysis

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Confirmatory Factor Analysis

  • CFA is a second study often undertaken to validate the scale.
  • A subset of sophisticated statistical techniques (structural equation modeling)
  • Involves tests of a measurement model
  • Stipulates the hypothesized relationship between latent traits and manifest variables (items)

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Interpretability of Scale Scores

  • Interpretability: the degree to which one can assign qualitative meaning
  • Percentile
  • Standard scores
  • Norms
  • Cutoff points

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Critiquing Scale Development Studies

  • Methods used
  • Whether the evidence regarding the scale’s psychometric adequacy is sufficiently sound
  • See Box 15.1

*