Data Collection in Quantitative Research & Measurements and Data Quality
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Chapter 14
Measurement and Data Quality
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Question
Tell whether the following statement is true or false:
Measurement involves assigning numbers to objects to represent the amount of an attribute.
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Answer
True
Measurement involves assigning numbers to objects to represent the amount of an attribute, using a specified set of rules. Researchers strive to develop or use measurements whose rules are isomorphic with reality.
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Measurement
- The assignment of numbers to represent the amount of an attribute present in an object or person, using specific rules
- Rules are necessary to promote consistency and interpretability.
- Advantages
- Removes guesswork
- Provides precise information
- Less vague than words
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Theories of Measurement
- Psychometrics is a branch of psychology concerned with the theory and methods of psychological measurement.
- Two theories
- Classical test theory (CTT)
- Item response theory (IRT)
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Errors of Measurement
Obtained Score = True score + Error
Obtained score: an actual data value for a participant
True score: value that would be obtained for a hypothetical perfect measure attribute
Error of measurement: represents measurement inaccuracies
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Factors That Contribute to Errors of Measurement
- Situational contaminants
- Transitory personal factors
- Response-set biases
- Administration variations
- Instrument clarity
- Item sampling
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Major Types of Measures
- Generic
- Specific
- Static
- Adaptive
- Reflective scales
- Formative indexes
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Measurement Taxonomy
- Four measurement property domains
- Cross-sectional domains
- Reliability
- Validity
- Longitudinal measurement domains
- Reliability of change scores
- Responsiveness
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Correlation Coefficients
- Correlation coefficients indicate direction and magnitude of relationships between variables.
- Pearson's r
- Range:
From −1.00 (perfect negative correlation)
Through 0.00 (no correlation)
To +1.00 (perfect positive correlation)
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Reliability
- Consistency—the absence of variation in measuring a stable attribute for an individual
- Reliability assessments involve computing a reliability coefficient.
- Most reliability coefficients are based on correlation coefficients.
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Question
Tell whether the following statement is true or false:
Reliability coefficients usually range from .00 to 1.00, with higher values reflecting less reliability.
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Answer
False
Reliability coefficients usually range from .00 to 1.00, with higher values reflecting greater reliability not less reliability.
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Reliability
- Replication approaches
- Test-retest reliability: administration of the same measure to the same people on two occasions
- Interrater reliability: measurements by two or more observers or raters using the same instrument or measurements by the same observer or rater on two or more occasions
- Parallel test reliability: measurements of the same attribute using alternate versions of the same instrument, with the same people
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Reliability Coefficient (R)
- Represent the proportion of true variability to obtained variability:
R = VT
Vo
- Should be at least .70; .80 preferable
- Can be improved by making instrument longer (adding items)
- Are lower in homogeneous than in heterogeneous samples
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Internal Consistency
- The extent to which all the instrument’s items are measuring the same attribute
- Evaluated by administering instrument on one occasion
- Appropriate for most multi-item instruments
- Most widely used evaluation method is the coefficient alpha.
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Measurement Error
- Unless a reliability coefficient is 1.0 (virtually never happens), measurement error is present.
- Used to estimate the range within which the true score lies
- Standard error of measurement (SEM)
- Limits of agreement (LOA)
- Measurement error is routinely estimated for multi-item measures developed with item response theory (IRT) methods.
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Validity
- The degree to which an instrument measures what it is supposed to measure (resilience)
- Four aspects of validity
- Face validity
- Content validity
- Criterion-related validity
- Construct validity
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Face Validity
- Refers to whether the instrument looks as though it is measuring the appropriate construct
- Based on judgment, no objective criteria for assessment
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Content Validity
- The degree to which an instrument has an appropriate sample of items for the construct being measured
- Relevance
- Comprehensiveness
- Balance
- Evaluated by expert evaluation, via the content validity index (CVI)
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Criterion Validity
- The degree to which the instrument correlates with an external criterion or “gold standard”
- Focal measures
- Expense, efficiency, risk and discomfort, criterion unavailable, and prediction
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Criterion Validity (cont.)
Two types of criterion-related validity:
- Predictive validity: the instrument’s ability to distinguish people whose performance differs on a future criterion
- Concurrent validity: the instrument’s ability to distinguish individuals who differ on a present criterion
- Specificity, sensitivity
- Predictive values
- Likelihood ratios
- Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), area under the curve (AUC)
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Construct Validity
Concerned with the questions:
- What is this instrument really measuring?
- Does it adequately measure the construct of interest?
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Methods of Assessing Construct Validity
- Hypothesis-testing validity
- Convergent validity
- Known-groups validity
- Divergent validity (discriminant validity)
- Multitrait–multimethod matrix method (MTMM)
- Structural validity
- Cross-cultural validity
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Measuring Change
- Change score: represents the amount of change between two scores
- Difference score: the difference between the randomized groups at posttest
- Smallest detectable change (SDC): a change in scores that is beyond measurement error
- Reliable change index (RCI): assesses the clinical significance of improvement during a psychotherapeutic intervention
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Responsiveness
- The ability of a measure to detect change over time in a construct that has changed, commensurate with the amount of change that has occurred
- Whether a change score is truly capturing a real change in the construct
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Question
Tell whether the following statement is true or false:
Reliability is the degree to which an instrument measures what it is supposed to measure.
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Answer
False
Validity is the degree to which an instrument measures what it is supposed to measure. Reliability is the degree of consistency or accuracy with which an instrument measures an attribute.
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Critiquing Data Quality in Quantitative Studies
- Can I trust the data in this study?
- Are the measurements of key constructs reliable and valid, and are change scores reliable and responsive?
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Psychometric Assessment
- Gather evidence:
- Validity
- Reliability
- Other assessment criteria