Discussion Question

profileyury12082
Polit10e_PPT_Ch10.ppt

Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Chapter 10

Rigor and Validity in
Quantitative Research

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Validity and Validity Threats

  • Validity: the approximate truth of inference
  • Threats to validity are reasons that an inference could be wrong.

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Types of Validity

  • Statistical conclusion validity
  • Internal validity
  • Construct validity
  • External validity

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Controlling Intrinsic Source
of Confounding Variability

  • Randomization
  • Crossover
  • Homogeneity
  • Stratification/blocking
  • Matching (pair matching)
  • Statistical control

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Benefits and Limitations of Control Methods: Randomization

Benefits:

  • Controls all preintervention confounding variables
  • Does not require advance knowledge of which variables to control

Limitations:

  • Ethical and practical constraints on variables that can be manipulated
  • Possible artificiality of conditions

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Benefits and Limitations of Control Methods: Crossover (Repeated Measures)

Benefits:

  • If done with randomization, strongest possible approach

Limitations:

  • Cannot be used if there are possible carryover effects from one condition to another
  • History threat may be relevant if external factors change over time.

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Benefits and Limitations of Control Methods: Homogeneity

Benefits:

  • Easy to achieve in all types of research
  • Enhances interpretability of relationships

Limitations:

  • Limits generalizability
  • Requires knowledge of which variables to control
  • Range restriction could lower statistical conclusion validity.

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Benefits and Limitations of Control Methods: Stratification

Benefits:

  • Enhances the ability to detect and interpret relationships
  • Offers opportunity of examining blocking variable as an independent variable

Limitations:

  • Usually restricted to a few stratifying variables
  • Requires knowledge of which variables to control

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Benefits and Limitations of Control Methods: Matching

Benefits:

  • Enhances interpretability of relationships
  • May be easy if there is a large “pool” of potential available controls

Limitations:

  • Usually restricted to a few matching variables
  • Requires knowledge of which variables to match
  • May be difficult to find comparison group matches, especially if there are more than two matching variables

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Benefits and Limitations of Control Methods: Statistical Control

Benefits:

  • Enhances ability to detect and interpret relationships
  • Relatively economical means of controlling several confounding variables

Limitations:

  • Requires knowledge of which variables to control, as well as measurement of these variables
  • Requires some statistical sophistication

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Four Types of Validity Affect
Rigor of Quantitative Study

  • Statistical conclusion validity
  • Internal validity
  • Construct validity
  • External validity

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Statistical Conclusion Validity

  • Low statistical power
  • Restriction of range
  • Unreliable implementation of a treatment

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Intervention Fidelity

  • Extent to which the implementation of a treatment is faithful to its plan

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Internal Validity

  • Temporal ambiguity
  • Selection
  • History
  • Maturation
  • Mortality/attrition
  • Testing and instrumentation

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Construct Validity

  • Concerns inferences from the particular exemplars of a study to the higher order constructs that they are intended to represent

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Threats to Construct Validity

  • Reactivity to the study situations
  • Researcher expectancies
  • Novelty effects
  • Compensatory effects
  • Treatment diffusion

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

External Validity

  • Concerns inferences about the extent to which relationships observed in a study hold true over variations in people, conditions, and setting as well as over variations in treatments and outcomes

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Threats to External Validity

  • Interaction between relationship and people
  • Interaction between causal effects and treatment variation

*

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Trade-Offs and Priorities in Study Validity

  • Internal and external validity
  • Prioritization and design decisions

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

RE-AIM Framework

  • Reach
  • Efficacy
  • Adoption
  • Implementation
  • Maintenance