Discussion Question
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Chapter 10
Rigor and Validity in
Quantitative Research
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Validity and Validity Threats
- Validity: the approximate truth of inference
- Threats to validity are reasons that an inference could be wrong.
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Types of Validity
- Statistical conclusion validity
- Internal validity
- Construct validity
- External validity
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Controlling Intrinsic Source
of Confounding Variability
- Randomization
- Crossover
- Homogeneity
- Stratification/blocking
- Matching (pair matching)
- Statistical control
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Benefits and Limitations of Control Methods: Randomization
Benefits:
- Controls all preintervention confounding variables
- Does not require advance knowledge of which variables to control
Limitations:
- Ethical and practical constraints on variables that can be manipulated
- Possible artificiality of conditions
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Benefits and Limitations of Control Methods: Crossover (Repeated Measures)
Benefits:
- If done with randomization, strongest possible approach
Limitations:
- Cannot be used if there are possible carryover effects from one condition to another
- History threat may be relevant if external factors change over time.
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Benefits and Limitations of Control Methods: Homogeneity
Benefits:
- Easy to achieve in all types of research
- Enhances interpretability of relationships
Limitations:
- Limits generalizability
- Requires knowledge of which variables to control
- Range restriction could lower statistical conclusion validity.
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Benefits and Limitations of Control Methods: Stratification
Benefits:
- Enhances the ability to detect and interpret relationships
- Offers opportunity of examining blocking variable as an independent variable
Limitations:
- Usually restricted to a few stratifying variables
- Requires knowledge of which variables to control
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Benefits and Limitations of Control Methods: Matching
Benefits:
- Enhances interpretability of relationships
- May be easy if there is a large “pool” of potential available controls
Limitations:
- Usually restricted to a few matching variables
- Requires knowledge of which variables to match
- May be difficult to find comparison group matches, especially if there are more than two matching variables
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Benefits and Limitations of Control Methods: Statistical Control
Benefits:
- Enhances ability to detect and interpret relationships
- Relatively economical means of controlling several confounding variables
Limitations:
- Requires knowledge of which variables to control, as well as measurement of these variables
- Requires some statistical sophistication
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Four Types of Validity Affect
Rigor of Quantitative Study
- Statistical conclusion validity
- Internal validity
- Construct validity
- External validity
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Statistical Conclusion Validity
- Low statistical power
- Restriction of range
- Unreliable implementation of a treatment
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Intervention Fidelity
- Extent to which the implementation of a treatment is faithful to its plan
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Internal Validity
- Temporal ambiguity
- Selection
- History
- Maturation
- Mortality/attrition
- Testing and instrumentation
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Construct Validity
- Concerns inferences from the particular exemplars of a study to the higher order constructs that they are intended to represent
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Threats to Construct Validity
- Reactivity to the study situations
- Researcher expectancies
- Novelty effects
- Compensatory effects
- Treatment diffusion
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
External Validity
- Concerns inferences about the extent to which relationships observed in a study hold true over variations in people, conditions, and setting as well as over variations in treatments and outcomes
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Threats to External Validity
- Interaction between relationship and people
- Interaction between causal effects and treatment variation
*
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Trade-Offs and Priorities in Study Validity
- Internal and external validity
- Prioritization and design decisions
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
RE-AIM Framework
- Reach
- Efficacy
- Adoption
- Implementation
- Maintenance