Health Policy
Maleficient
PolicyAnalysisEvaluation.docEvaluation of Student Writing
NAME OF WRITER:
COURSE # AND TITLE:
TYPE OF FORMAL PAPER: Policy Analysis Paper
DATE OF EVALUATION:
EVALUATION CHECKLIST
For each criterion, the following 5-point scale is applied:
5-Excellent (A model of good practice)
4- Good (A few minor defects)
3- Mediocre (Not good, not bad)
2- Poor (Some serious defects)
1- Very poor (Mostly major defects)
CRITERION |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
1. Clear beginning, development, and conclusion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Appropriate paragraphing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Clear and appropriate transitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Appropriate length to cover topic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Clearly and coherently focused (including a good sense of audience) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Thoughts clearly organized, logical in progression and presented |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Assertions are clearly supported and/or illustrated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Correct sentence structure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Correct spelling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Correct punctuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Correct capitalization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Appropriate word usage 13. Correct Title page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Correct Table of contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. Reference page included and in correct format |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.Appropriately cited resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17. Appropriate number of resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. Content appropriate to objectives of assignment. ( Each item below is worth 6 points): · Problem Identification · Background · Issue Statement · Stakeholders · Policy Objectives · Policy Alternatives · Evaluation Criteria · Analysis of Alternatives · Comparison scorecard · Summary/Recommendations |
6
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
|
20. Paper presented clearly, succinctly, logically (if applicable) (5pts) |
|
|
|
|
|
Grading Scale Total Points= /150
Equivalent letter grade=
