police under scrutiny

In your assigned reading, you see the author ask the question, "[s]hould Congress abolish qualified immunity for police officers?"  The issue in this question is qualified immunity, and there are two perspectives on this issue presented.

The specific section I am referring to can be seen here:   Pro Con Qualified Immunity.pdf .

For your discussion board assignment, please address  one of the following topics from your reading:

- Should local governments reduce police funding? - Would bans on aggressive police tactics reduce the use of deadly force? - Should Congress make it easier for police officers to be held accountable in court? Present  both sides of the question you choose. The reader should not be able to tell how you personally feel from reading the response. Instead, the reader should see an  unbiased look at both sides of the chosen issue. Please use your assigned reading and  at least  two  outside, additional resources. Your resources must be cited using APA standards. Your response should be no less than  500 words. Please make sure that your grammar, punctuation, and spelling reflect a college-level submission.

Here is the website:

Police Under Scrutiny: CQR (cqpress.com).

If you cant get it on the website, you can go onto Google: Type in Police under Scrutiny it is the first link that comes up.