Compare SAFe to Large Scrum at Scale (LeSS) Project

Rubric for Group Projects PMGT 573 Course

1 Author: Winston Gonzalez, D.M., SPC

Agile Team Name: ______________________ Component: ___________

Excelent Above Average Average Below Average Absent

   S co re

Po ss ib le

Po ss ib le

Po ss ib le

Po ss ib le

Po ss ib le

Criteria     Possible  Points  -­‐-­‐> 5 4.5 4.25 4 None 0 Project   Requirements   (50%  weight)

0.00 Meets  all   requirements  for   this  week’s   component   saHsfactorily  

2.50 Somewhat  meets   requirements  (at   least  3)  for  this   week’s  component  

2.25 Slightly  meets   requirements  (at   least  2)  for  this   week

2.13 Slightly  meets   requirements  (at   least  1)  for  this   week

2.00 Absent  or  failed  to   meet  at  least  1   requirement

0.00

CriHcal  Thinking   (15%  weight)

0.00 Demonstrates   excellent  ability  to   work  with  key   concepts  /   informaHon  /   process  /  theory   related  to  topic  by   idenHfying  paRerns,   interpreHng   challenging   concepts,  drawing   logical  conclusions,   explaining   component  parts,   and  sketching   potenHal   applicaHons  or   extensions  to  new   problems  or   contexts

0.75 Demonstrates  above   average  ability  to   work  with  key   concepts  /   informaHon  /   process  /  theory   related  to  topic  by   idenHfying  paRerns,   interpreHng   challenging   concepts,  drawing   logical  conclusions,   explaining   component  parts,   and  sketching   potenHal   applicaHons  or   extensions  to  new   problems  or   contexts

0.68 Demonstrates   average  ability  to   work  with  key   concepts  /   informaHon  /   process  /  theory   related  to  topic  by   idenHfying  paRerns,   interpreHng   challenging   concepts,  drawing   logical  conclusions,   explaining   component  parts,   and  sketching   potenHal   applicaHons  or   extensions  to  new   problems  or   contexts

0.64 Demonstrates  below   average  ability  to   work  with  key   concepts  /   informaHon  /   process  /  theory   related  to  topic  by   idenHfying  paRerns,   interpreHng   challenging   concepts,  drawing   logical  conclusions,   explaining   component  parts,   and  sketching   potenHal   applicaHons  or   extensions  to  new   problems  or   contexts

0.60 Absent  or  lacks   connecHon  to  key   concepts  /   informaHon  /   process  /  theory   related  to  topic

0.00

Teamwork  and   CollaboraHon   (10%  weight)

0.00 Through   retrospecHve  and   self  assessment,   demonstrates   excellent   contribuHons  to   group  tasks  as   individuals,   recognizing  how  to   maximize  group   efficiency  while   facilitaHng  the   contribuHons  of   team  members

0.50 Through   retrospecHve  and   self  assessment,   demonstrates  above   average   contribuHons  to   group  tasks  as   individuals,   recognizing  how  to   maximize  group   efficiency  while   facilitaHng  the   contribuHons  of   team  members

0.45 Through   retrospecHve  and   self  assessment,   demonstrates   average   contribuHons  to   group  tasks  as   individuals,   recognizing  how  to   maximize  group   efficiency  while   facilitaHng  the   contribuHons  of   team  members

0.43 Through   retrospecHve  and   self  assessment,   demonstrates  below   average   contribuHons  to   group  tasks  as   individuals,   recognizing  how  to   maximize  group   efficiency  while   facilitaHng  the   contribuHons  of   team  members

0.40 Absent  or  failes  to   complete  self-­‐ reflecHon  and  self   assessment  for  the   week

CommunicaHon   (10%  weight)

0.00 WriHng  is  excellent   within  context  and   for  purpose,  using   resources  and   evidence  while   controlling  use  of   grammar  and   mechanics

0.50 WriHng  is  above   average  within   context  and  for   purpose,  using   resources  and   evidence  while   controlling  use  of   grammar  and   mechanics

0.45 WriHng  is  average   within  context  and   for  purpose,  using   resources  and   evidence  while   controlling  use  of   grammar  and   mechanics

0.43 WriHng  is  below   average  within   context  and  for   purpose,  using   resources  and   evidence  while   controlling  use  of   grammar  and   mechanics

0.40 Absent  or  fails  to   communicate  as   expected

0.00

Timeliness                         (10%  weight)

0.00 Weekly  submission   completed  on-­‐Hme

0.50 Weekly  submission   completed  with  1   day  delay

0.45 Weekly  submission   completed  with  2   days  delay

0.43 Weekly  submission   completed  with  3+   days  delay

0.40 Absent  or  fails  to   submit  within  1   week  from  due  date

0.00

Built-­‐In  Quality   (5%  weight)

0.00 Product  meets  all   format   requirements,  reads   well,  and  is   organized  by   components  

0.25 Product  meets  most,   but  not  all  format   requirements,  reads   okay,  and  is   organized  by   components

0.23 Product  meets   some,  but  not  the   majority  of   forma`ng   requirements  

0.21 Product  meets  some   formaHng   requirements  with   too  many  issues

0.20 Absent  or  fails  to   format  end  result  as   required

0.00

Total 0.00 5.00 4.50 4.25 4.00 0.00