Cost management

profilecgarfias14
PM692-SCIProjectPlan_PM692BaselineV2.docx

SERVICE CONSTRUCTION INC.

SERVICE CONSTRUCTION INC.

APEX BUSINESS SYSTEMS PROJECT

PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

January 1 2021

Version 1.0

APEX BUSINESS SYSTEMS

Earl McMannis

George Nealy

Vinh Nguyen

Javier Nunez

Park University

PM692

VERSION HISTORY

Version #

Implemented

By (name of individual or as a team)

Revision

Date

Approved

By PM (Y or N)

Approval

Date

Reason (Why the change?

1.0

Javier Nunez

1/15/21

Y

1/15/20

PM692 New Format

2.0

Javier Nunez

1/26/21

Y

Communication Plan

3.0

Risk Management Plan

4.0

Stakeholder Management Plan

5.0

Updates to Entire Project Plan Based on Additional Work and Unexpected Events

6.0

Final Team Presentation

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTEGRATION MANAGEMENT.……………………………………………………5

1.1. Team Charter.……………………………………………………………....………………5

1.1.1. Project Description.………………………………………………………………….......5

1.1.2. Project Objectives.………………………………………………………………………5

1.1.3. Key Project Stakeholders ………………………………………………………………6

1.1.4. Core Team Principles …………………………………………………………………..7

1.1.5. Team Members ………………………………………………………………………….7

1.1.6. Key Measurements of Project Success ……………………….….……….…………...10

1.1.7. Team Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………..10

1.1.8. Deliverables ……………………………………………………………………….........11

1.2. Project Charter ………………………………………………………………………….. 12

1.2.1. Purpose of the Project ……………………………………...………………………… 12

1.2.2. Project Description …………………………………………………………………… 13

1.2.3. Project Assumptions ………………………………………………………………….. 13

1.2.4. Project Constraints …………………………………………………………………… 14

2. SCOPE MANAGEMENT ……………………………………………………………. 15

2.1. Work Breakdown Structure ……………………………………………………………. 15

2.2. WBS Updates ……………………………………………………………………………. 26

2.2.1. PM 692 WBS Modifications…………………………………………………………….27

2.3. Change Management or Control Management Plan …………………………………. 28

2.4. Deployment Plan ………………………………………………………………………… 28

2.4.1 Deployment Overview……………………………………………………………………29

3. UNEXPECTED EVENTS/ADDITIONAL WORK ………………….………………36

3.1 PM690………………………………………………………………………………..……...36

3.1.1 Unexpected Events Change Request Submittal………………………………………...36

3.2 PM691……………………………………………………………………………………….46

3.2.1 Unexpected Events Change Request Submittal………………………………………...

3.3 PM692……………………………………………………………………………………….

3.3.1 Unexpected Events Change Request Submittal………………………………………...

3.2.1 Additional Work………………………………………………………………………….36

3.2.2 Addition Work Impact…………………………………………………………………...36

3.2.3 Overall Conclusion to the Project……………………………………………………….36

4. QUALITY MANAGEMENT ………………………………………………………… 36

4.1 Roles and Responsibilities and Quality Tools ……………………...…………………….36

4.2 Quality Planning ………………………………………………………………………….. 38

4.3 Quality Assurance ………………………………………………………………………… 44

4.4 Quality Control …………………………………………………………………………… 47

5. TIME MANAGEMENT PLAN……………………………………………………….49

5.1 Time Management Plan Overview………………………………………………………..49

5.2 Schedule Plan……………………………………………………………………………….50

5.3 Critical Path………………………………………………………………………………...51

5.4 Gantt Chart…………………………………………………………………………………52

6. COST MANAGEMENT PLAN……………………………………………………….53

6.1 Overview of Cost Management……………………………………………………………55

6.2 Cost Risks…………………………………………………………………………………...53

6.3 Cost Estimates………………………………………………………………………………55

6.3.1 Breakdown Considerations………………………………………………………………57

6.3.2 Project Requirements Breakdown………………………………………………………57

6.3.3 Overall Costs……………………………………………………………………………...58

7. COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT PLAN………………………………...…….59

8. RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN……………………………………..………………….

9. STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT PLAN………………………………………….

APPENDIX A: REFERENCES ……………………………………………………………….62

APPENDIX B: FORMS ……………………………………………………………………….64

APPENDIX C: Communication Plan Forms…………………………………………………77

1. INTEGRATION MANAGEMENT

1.1 Team Charter

1.1.1 Project Description: The purpose of this Project is to replace the legacy Enterprise Information System (EIS) Pinnacle Business Systems (PBS) by developing and implementing a new EIS that can handle all of the functionality outlined in the Project Objectives section. In addition to a new EIS, the Project will also develop an informational company website and update the company vehicles for remote Teleconferencing. SCI's budget for the entire Project is $1 million to $1.4 million for this Project.

1.1.2 Project Objectives: The core project objectives, as requested by the customer, include an EIS that will allow for:

· A system that can handle the following functionality:

· Payroll

· Accounting

· Purchasing

· Bids and plans

· General and Administrative Expenses

· Project Management

· Management Reports

· Accessible by all employees

· Enterprise mail server

· Workstations for 40 full-time on-site staff. Each office employee must be equipped with a PC and wirelessly linked to a printer. Each machine should be equipped with dual flat screens no smaller than 19". In addition, each machine should have a headset and webcam for communication.

· 3 workstations in each of the two (2) remote office vehicles

· 2 workstations in each of the ten (10) trailers used at construction sites

· PDA and smartphone access to email

· 10 laptops for all key field personnel. Laptops will need to interface with main office computers from any location. In addition, they will need to withstand a "field" environment and therefore should be equivalent to "field" laptops the military uses.

· Company website highlighting company and key projects with contact links

· Microsoft Project Server and updated Microsoft Office suite

· New system will be off-the-shelf, established non-proprietary technology (preferred)

· The system should allow for standard reports and ad hoc report generation that may or may not combine data from multiple modules

All employees must receive the appropriate training for each module they will have access to within the system.

1.1.3 Key Project Stakeholders

· Dan Black, CEO Service Construction, Inc.

· Walt Granger, Director of IT Service Construction, Inc.

· Javier Nunez, Project Manager

· Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

· Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

· George Nealy, Software Engineer

· End-users

1.1.4 Core Team Principles

Our guiding core team principle is that that the users of the new information system, both their need and satisfaction, will be our #1 priority. Other internal core team principles include:

· Respect, Open Communication: the team will respect each other and maintain transparent, open communication at all levels

· Collaboration: each team member will try his or her best effort to ensure we collaborate, share responsibilities, and effectively complete assigned tasks

· On Time, On Budget, No Excuses: the success of the team will be gauged based on this Project's cost, schedule, and performance. We will make sure that the Project will complete on time, and within budget, to the best of our ability.

1.1.5 Team Members

Key Team Members

Role

Responsibilities

Earl McMannis

Technical Lead

- Oversee IT portion of the Project

- Facilitate technical discussions and manage daily challenges

- Participate in risk management

- Create and maintain technical documentation

- Work with PM and other departments to define resource requirements

- Report and escalate to management IT related issues as needed

- Lead testing effort

- Develop and implement Project Plan

Javier Nunez

Project Manager

- Monitor progress and ensure the Project completing within established time frame and budget

- Allocate resources appropriately

- Analyze and manage project risks

- Report monthly project status to leadership and stakeholders

- Organize and motivate team

- Develop and implement Project Plan

Vinh Nguyen

Project Coordinator

- Maintain and monitor project plans, project schedules, work hours, budgets and expenditures

- Organize, attend and participate in all stakeholder meetings

- Document and follow up on important actions and decisions from meetings

- Develop and implement Project Plan

George Nealy

Software Engineer

- Oversee software creation and implementation

- Attend technical discussions and advise Technical Lead on software solutions and issues

- Participate in risk management

- Maintain original software and all documentation

- Work with PM and other departments to define resource requirements

- Report to Technical lead software issues as needed

- Lead software testing effort

- Develop and implement Project Plan

1.1.6 Key Measurements of Project Success

· Schedule: all project deliverables delivered on time and before the end of the period of performance. Our estimated objective and threshold timeline are 6 and 8 months, respectively.

· Quality: all final hardware and software will work and function as intended and meet the approved required system specifications and drawings

· Cost: Our budgeted cost is between $1M (objective) and $1.4M (threshold) for this Project

1.1.7 Team Acknowledgements

· Earl McMannis, Technical Lead: This role will provide solutions to software or technical challenges during the development, design, and implementation of the customer's products and services. In addition, ensuring the Project meets all of the customer's design specifications for technical or software products for the duration of the Project.

· Javier Nunez, Project Manager: I acknowledge that my role is both to be the voice of the project team and the project stakeholders. I will ensure that the deliverables of the Project are communicated and delivered in the manner as agreed-upon in the Project Charter and that all risks are addressed in a timely manner. In partnership with the other project team members, we are dedicated to deliver the highest quality of products on time and on budget.

· Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator: To ensure our goals are achieved, I will listen and respect all contributors, be open to all ideas, trust each other, and meet assignments on time.

· George Nealy, Software Engineer: I will work side by side with the Technical Lead to ensure all software needs are met. I will design develop and implement all software solutions for the Project and assist with risk management. I will abide by all timelines set for me with the desired results accomplished.

· The team will meet every Thursday, 6 P.M. (CST) via Zoom link: https://park.zoom.us/j/94384116459

1.1.8 Deliverables

Unit 1

Unit 2

Unit 3

Unit 4

Unit 5

Unit 6

Unit 7

Unit 8

Javier Nunez

Create Weekly Team Deliverables; Edit Team Charter/Project Charter

Communication Matrix

Risk Management Plan Overview

Stakeholder Management Plan Overview

Additional Work

Overall Conclusion on to Project

Final Report

George Nealy

Establish roles and responsibilities; Team Acknowledgements; Deliverables; Quality Responsibility and Team roles and responsibilities for Software Engineer

Company Mission/Vision:

Impact

Vinh Nguyen

Edit Change Request form with updated team members; shift Work Breakdown Structure dates and added new member to WBS

Communication Matrix

Contingency and Management Reserves, Probability and Impact Matrix

Stakeholder Matrix

Unexpected Events

Team Presentation

Earl McMannis

Cross References Team Assignment Rubric Criteria with Team PM692 Document

Communication Report Types:

Impact

Due Dates to Team

17 Jan 2020 by 1100 CST

30 Jan 2020 by 2359 CST

12 Feb 2020 by 2359 CST

20 Feb 2020 by 2359 CST

24 Feb 2020 by 2359 CST

6 Mar 2020 by 2359 CST

Final Editor

Earl McMannis

Vinh Nguyen

George Nealy

Earl McMannis

Vinh Nguyen

George Nealy

Final Review

Javier Nunez

Javier Nunez

Javier Nunez

Javier Nunez

Earl McMannis

Javier Nunez

Upload

Javier Nunez

Javier Nunez

Javier Nunez

Javier Nunez

Javier Nunez

Javier Nunez

1.2 Project Charter

1.2.1 Purpose of the Project

The purpose of this Project is to replace the legacy Enterprise Information System (EIS) Pinnacle Business Systems (PBS) by developing and implementing a new EIS that can handle all of the functionality outlined in the Project Objectives section. The new EIS is called Apex Business Systems (ABS). In addition to a new EIS, the Project will also develop an informational company website and update the company vehicles for remote teleconferencing. This highest-priority Project is created to improve the current sluggish and outdated data processing and information management systems. It also enables the company to stay competitive in a marketplace where customers are increasingly demanding quick response and the flexibility to tailor projects to new and unique situations.

1.2.2 Project Description

SCI is growing and transforming itself from original roots as a construction contractor for refurbishing commercial office and warehouse space, and as a sub­contractor on larger, new commercial office buildings. The executive management has envisioned a future for the company with a mix of business in which the largest part is higher margin industrial construction projects. However, the current basic management system is not providing necessary information nor providing it in a timely fashion to be competitive. Moreover, our current custom enterprise software, PBS, is buggy and slow. Therefore, as part of the vision to improve its tactical operations, SCI's management has prioritized and placed in the most urgent category of projects to be undertaken immediately is improvement of its computer system to process operations data and provide management information. To better support this new business model, the new state of the art EIS will provide the capability and environment as described in Project Objectives section. Our estimated objective and threshold timeline are 6 and 8 months, respectively. Approved budget is $1 million to $1.4 million for this Project.

1.2.3 Project Assumptions

Assumptions are based on the original plan provided during the project planning phase. The assumptions are anticipated to occur or will have some impact during the Project. Any negative impact or significant assumption pertaining to the project schedule or budget will be added to the risk management plan.

· Departments: Facility access, power requirements, and section management approvals.

· Department managers will ensure access to buildings and server rooms will be provided with twenty-four-hour access as required.

· Current system has installed upgrade power requirements to meet requirements for all new hardware.

· Department managers will provide forty-eight-hour approvals for any change documentation to include submission, review, and signature authority.

· Schedule: Project tasks, phases, and work breakdown structure.

· Hardware and materials will be available onsite prior to installation.

· Project will be phased based on inspection points determined by customer.

· Budget: Management reserve, funding request, and signature authority.

· Project currently holds a 10% management reserve.

· Funding request will follow organizational request and approval process

· Funding request over one hundred thousand will require secondary approval from financial approval board.

· Hardware: EIS system, location, and connections.

· Each department's current system has been upgraded to handle the new additions of hardware for this Project.

· Each department manager has predetermined the locations and footprint for new hardware.

· All cabling and connectors will be procured through department accounts prior to Project.

· Each vehicle and trailer will be upgraded with new hardware and software systematically when due for monthly maintenance at the service center.

· Software: Design, software development, and technical documentation.

· Design will be compatible and able to run on existing and new hardware.

· Software development will be complete before installation.

· Customer to provide all technical documentation to current system requirements to aid in the development and installation.

1.2.4 Project Constraints

The Project is constrained by the following:

· No part of the legacy system, Pinnacle Business Systems (PBS), is salvageable (except for the data) so no costs can be recouped or time savings from building off of the legacy system. PBS will be completely retired after we go online with the new system.

· Historical data from the old system, PBS, needs to be able to be imported into the new system.

· The cost for the Project should not exceed $1.4 million

· The Project is estimated to take 6 to 8 months; if this changes, the project schedule needs to be revised

· In order for the new system to have a longer shelf life and the ability to more easily upgrade to more advances processing and functionality, the system should avoid proprietary technology when possible and the database structure be off-the-shelf technology with minimum customization.

· The new enterprise mail service should allow mobile (PDA and smart phone) access to email.

· The new system will need to be accessible and have a consistent experience across the various places it can be accessed – workstation in remote vehicles, on-site workstations, workstations in construction site trailers, and laptops for field environment.

2. SCOPE MANAGEMENT

2.1 Work Breakdown Structure

Level #

Task

Start Date

End Date

Dependencies

Assigned

1.0

Apex Information Systems

6/1/20

Javier Nunez, Project Manager Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1

Enterprise Information Systems

6/1/20

12/22/20

Project Charter

Javier Nunez, Project Manager Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.1

Requirements Documentation

6/1/20

6/30/20

Project Charter

Javier Nunez, Project Manager Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.1.1

Project Scope

6/1/20

6/7/20

Project Charter

Javier Nunez, Project Manager Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.1.2

Requirements Gathering Sessions

6/8/20

6/30/20

1.1.1.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.1.2.1

Payroll Requirements

6/8/20

6/10/20

1.1.1.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.1.1.2.2

Accounting Requirements

6/10/20

6/12/20

1.1.1.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.1.1.2.3

Expense Reporting Requirements

6/12/20

6/14/20

1.1.1.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.1.1.2.4

Procurement Requirements

6/14/20

6/26/20

1.1.1.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.1.2.5

Status Reporting Requirements

6/16/20

6/18/20

1.1.1.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.1.2.6

Bidding Requirements

6/18/20

6/20/20

1.1.1.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.1.1.2.7

Pricing Requirements

6/20/20

6/22/20

1.1.1.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.1.1.2.8

Materials Estimating Requirements

6/22/20

6/24/20

1.1.1.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.1.2.9

Operating System Option Analysis

6/20/20

6/24/20

1.1.1.1

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.1.2.10

Operating System Decision

6/24/20

6/24/20

1.1.1.2.10

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.1.2.11

Operating System Impact Analysis

6/24/20

6/24/20

1.1.1.2.11

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.1.3

Project Plan

6/24/20

6/30/20

1.1.1, 1.1.1.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.1.4

Project Plan Sign-Off

7/1/20

7/1/20

1.1.1.3

Javier Nunez, Project Manager Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.1.5

Risk Management Plan

6/24/20

6/30/20

1.1.1.3

Javier Nunez, Project Manager Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.2

System Development

7/1/2020

8/28/2020

1.1.1.3

Team

1.1.2.1

Enterprise Information System

7/1/20

8/10/20

1.1.1.3

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.2.1.1

Payroll Module

7/1/20

7/5/20

1.1.1.3

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.1.2.1.2

Accounting Module

7/5/20

7/10/20

1.1.1.3

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.1.2.1.3

Expense Reporting Module

7/10/20

7/15/20

1.1.1.3

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.1.2.1.4

Procurement Module

7/15/20

7/20/20

1.1.1.3

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.1.2.1.5

Status Reporting Module

7/20/20

7/25/20

1.1.1.3

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.1.2.1.6

Bidding Module

7/25/20

8/2/20

1.1.1.3

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.1.2.1.7

Pricing Module

8/2/20

8/7/20

1.1.1.3

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.1.2.1.8

Materials Estimating Module

8/7/20

8/10/20

1.1.1.3

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.1.2.2

Data Import from Legacy System

8/10/20

8/10/20

1.1.1.3

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.2.2.1

Data Validation

8/10/20

8/12/20

1.1.2.2

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.2.3

Quality Assurance

8/12/20

8/15/20

1.1.1.3

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.2.4

Existing Infrastructure Upgrades

8/15/20

8/25/20

1.1.1.3

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.2.5

Enterprise Mail Server Integration

8/25/20

8/28/20

1.1.1.3

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.3

Sys & User Dev Testing

8/28/2020

9/30/2020

1.1.1.3

Team

1.1.3.1

Quality Management Investigation

8/28/20

9/1/20

1.1.1.3

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.3.2

System Testing

9/1/20

9/20/20

1.1.1.3

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.3.2.1

DEV Testing

9/1/20

9/5/20

1.1.1.3

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.3.2.2

UNIT Testing

9/5/20

9/10/20

1.1.1.3

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.3.2.3

INTG Testing

9/10/20

9/15/20

1.1.1.3

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.3.2.4

PROD Testing

9/15/20

9/20/20

1.1.1.3

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.3.3

Quality Assurance Testing

9/20/20

9/22/20

1.1.3.2

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.3.4

User Acceptance Testing

9/22/20

9/30/20

1.1.3.3

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.4

Training & Deployment

10/1/2020

11/1/2020

1.1.4.1

Vendor-Created Training for Employees

10/1/20

10/7/20

None

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.1.4.1.1

User Manual

10/1/20

10/7/20

None

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.1.4.2

Communication of Transition Plan

10/1/20

10/1/20

None

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

1.1.4.3

Inventory Verification Checklist

10/1/20

10/1/20

1.1.1.1

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.1.4.3.1

Printer

10/1/20

10/1/20

1.1.1.1

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.1.4.3.2

Server Racks

10/1/20

10/1/20

1.1.1.1

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.1.4.3.3

Workstation & Monitors

10/1/20

10/1/20

1.1.1.1

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.1.4.3.4

Field Laptops

10/1/20

10/1/20

1.1.1.1

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.1.4.4

Pilot Group Deployment

10/7/20

10/31/20

1.1.3.4

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

1.1.4.5

Full Deployment

11/1/20

11/1/20

1.1.4.4

Javier Nunez, Project Manager George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.5

Project Handoff/Closeout

11/1/20

12/16/20

1.1.4.5

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen

Project Coordinator

1.1.5.1

Maintenance Plan

11/1/20

11/14/20

1.1.1.3

Javier Nunez, Project Manager George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.5.2

Decommission Legacy System

11/14/20

11/15/20

1.1.4.5

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.1.5.3

Recommendations

11/15/20

11/15/20

1.1.1.3

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

1.1.5.4

Project Closeout Meeting

11/16/20

11/16/20

1.1.5.2

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

1.2

Company Website

7/1/20

6/1/20

10/30/20

9/25/20

Project Charter

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.2.1

Design Requirements

7/1/20

6/1/20

7/28/20

6/26/20

Project Charter

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.2.1.1

Content Development/Submission

7/1/20

6/1/20

7/10/20

6/10/20

Project Charter

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.2.1.2

Content Approval

7/10/20

6/10/20

7/10/20

6/10/20

1.2.1.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.2.1.3

User Interface

7/10/20

6/10/20

7/20/20

6/20/20

1.2.1.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.2.1.4

Platform

7/20/20

6/20/20

7/25/20

6/25/20

1.2.1.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

George Nealy, System Engineer

1.2.1.5

Restricted vs Unrestricted Content

7/25/20

6/25/20

7/28/20

6/28/20

1.2.1.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.2.2

Website Development

8/1/20

6/29/20

9/30/20

8/27/20

1.2.1

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.2.2.1

Create Code Design Document

8/14/20

7/13/20

8/21/20

7/20/20

1.2.1

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.2.2.2

Update Security Patches

8/21/20

7/20/20

8/23/20

7/22/20

1.2.1

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.2.2.3

Update Hosting Language

8/23/20

7/22/20

8/25/20

7/24/20

1.2.1

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.2.2.4

Implement Firewall

8/25/20

7/24/20

8/28/20

7/27/20

1.2.1

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.2.2.5

Database Model Code Generation

8/28/20

7/27/20

8/30/20

7/29/20

1.2.1

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.2.2.5.1

Release Testing

8/30/20

7/29/20

9/1/20

7/30/20

1.2.2

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.2.2.5.2

Bug Fixes

9/10/20

8/8/20

9/15/20

8/13/20

1.2.2

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.2.2.6

Application Integration

9/15/20

8/13/20

9/30/20

8/28/20

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.2.2.6.1

Operation Switchover

9/15/20

8/13/20

9/20/20

8/18/20

1.2.2

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.2.2.6.2

Application Administration

9/20/20

8/18/20

9/22/20

8/20/20

1.2.2

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.2.2.6.3

System Administration Rights

9/22/20

8/20/20

9/24/20

8/22/20

1.2.2

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.2.2.6.4

Disaster Recovery Mode

9/24/20

8/22/20

9/30/20

8/28/20

1.2.2

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.2.3

Website Launch & Maintenance

10/1/20

8/27/20

10/30/20

9/25/20

1.2.2.6

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.2.3.1

Launch Website

10/1/20

8/27/20

10/1/20

8/27/20

1.2.2.6

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.2.3.2

Ongoing Maintenance Plan

10/5/20

8/31/20

10/5/20

8/31/20

1.2.2.6

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.2.3.3

Search Engine Optimization (SEO)

10/6/20

9/1/20

10/15/20

9/10/20

1.2.2.6

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.2.3.4

Analytics

10/15/20

9/10/20

10/20/20

9/15/20

1.2.2.6

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.2.3.5

Support

10/20/20

9/15/20

10/30/30

9/25/20

1.2.2.6

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.3

Company Vehicle Technology Upgrade

7/1/20

6/1/20

9/16/20

8/17/20

Project Charter

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.3.1

Requirements Document

7/1/20

6/1/20

7/7/20

6/7/20

Project Charter

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.3.1.1

Requirements Gathering Sessions

7/1/20

6/1/20

7/7/20

6/7/20

Project Charter

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.3.1.2

Project Plan Sign-Off

7/7/20

6/7/20

7/7/20

6/7/20

1.3.1.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.3.2

Procurement

7/7/20

6/8/20

7/25/20

6/26/20

1.3.1.2

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.3.2.1

Procure New Vehicles

7/7/20

6/8/20

7/15/20

6/16/20

1.3.1.2

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.3.2.2

Inspection

7/15/20

6/16/20

7/20/20

6/21/20

1.3.2.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.3.2.3

Initial Inventory Checklist

7/20/20

6/21/20

7/25/20

6/26/20

1.3.2.1

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.3.2.4

Integration Assessment

7/20/20

6/21/20

7/25/20

6/26/20

1.3.2.1

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.3.2.4.1

Cabling

7/20/20

6/21/20

7/21/20

6/22/20

1.3.2.1

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.3.2.4.2

Laptop Docking Station

7/21/20

6/22/20

7/22/20

6/23/20

1.3.2.1

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.3.2.4.3

Wi-Fi

7/22/20

6/23/20

7/23/20

6/24/20

1.3.2.1

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.3.2.4.4

Generator

7/23/20

6/24/20

7/24/20

6/25/20

1.3.2.1

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.3.2.4.5

Peripheral

7/24/20

6/25/20

7/25/20

6/26/20

1.3.2.1

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.3.3

Infrastructure Upgrade

7/25/20

6/26/20

8/25/20

7/28/20

1.3.2

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.3.3.1

Vehicle Infrastructure Customization

7/25/20

6/26/20

8/25/20

7/28/20

1.3.2.2

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.3.3.1.1

Additional Cabling Installation

8/1/20

7/3/20

8/5/20

7/7/20

1.3.2.2

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.3.3.1.2

Laptop Docking Station

8/5/20

7/7/20

8/10/20

7/12/20

1.3.2.2

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.3.3.1.3

Wi-Fi Compatibility

8/10/20

7/12/20

8/15/20

7/17/20

1.3.2.2

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.3.3.1.4

Generator Installation

8/15/20

7/17/20

8/20/20

7/22/20

1.3.2.2

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.3.3.1.5

Peripherals Installation

8/20/20

7/22/20

8/25/20

7/27/20

1.3.2.2

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.3.3.2

Existing Trailer Infrastructure Upgrade

8/25/20

7/27/20

8/30/20

8/1/20

1.3.1.2

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

1.3.3.3

Compatibility Testing

8/25/20

7/27/20

8/26/20

7/28/20

1.3.3.2

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.3.3.4

Quality Assurance

8/26/20

7/28/20

8/28/20

7/30/20

1.3.3.1, 1.3.3.2

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead George Nealy, System Engineer

1.3.3.5

Safety Inspections

8/28/20

7/30/20

8/30/20

8/1/20

1.3.3.4

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.3.4

Vehicle Maintenance

9/1/20

7/29/20

9/15/20

8/12/20

1.3.3.4

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator

1.3.4.1

Safety Maintenance Plan

9/1/20

7/29/20

9/5/20

8/2/20

1.3.3.4

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.3.4.2

Technology Maintenance Plan

9/5/20

8/2/20

9/10/20

8/7/20

1.3.3.4

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.3.4.3

Security Patch Deployment Schedule

9/10/20

8/7/20

9/15/20

8/12/20

1.3.3.4

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

1.3.4.4

Driver Update Deployment Schedule

9/15/20

8/12/20

9/16/20

8/13/20

1.3.3.4

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Vinh Nguyen, Project Coordinator George Nealy, System Engineer

2.2 WBS Updates

All requests to change the WBS will be treated as a change control project because of the change's potential to impact the scope, schedule and/or budget. These requests need to go through the formal submittal and approval process. The Project Manager and relevant stakeholders will review the proposed request and take into account the potential for scope, schedule or budget change and approve or deny the request as necessary. If the change is required and inevitable and has a large impact to the Project, a new project charter should be drawn up with the adjustments incorporated. The entire project plan will need to be reviewed for impact, not just the directly related items (Bowen, n.d.).

2.2.1 PM 691 WBS Modifications

During the time and cost management planning our team has identified information that was changed in the WBS. As each step of the Project is analyzed further, it is important to look back and see what new information may need to adjust. For our team, the primary focus of change was what time we estimated for our WBS tasks.

During the time management planning the team discovered a few tasks that were not dependent on others and could therefore be started earlier. By starting these tasks earlier we have a better likelihood of early completion which could shorten our critical path leading to cost savings and finishing ahead of schedule. The tasks that have changed (this information is reflected in the WBS) are primary tasks 1.2, and 1.3. The main tasks 1.2, and 1.3 have adjusted to start on June 1 rather than on July 1, with each sub step maintaining the same time allotted with earlier end dates. For exact date changes, both the previous time and new times are annotated within the WBS. Essentially the start and end dates for each task has been moved to the left which will hopefully lead to gaining time and finishing the entire Project early.

All of the WBS changes were approved by the project manager and therefore do not require a change request to be implemented. The WBS now reflects the correct dates respective to each corresponding activity. This timeline allows for additional slack as well as offers the chance to finish early and begin work on other sections of the Project.

2.3. Change Management or Control Management Plan

· Overall Strategy: The Change Management Plan (CMP) has been established to serve as a guide and process procedure to ensure efficient and successful documentation in executing any required changes within the Project. The Change Management Plan seeks to gain single point of accountability to collect, review, analyze, approve, and provide authorization to implement the requested changes. In addition, the CMP provides clear paths for communication of changes to permit multiple teams to work together on meeting the desired goals and objectives of the Project and organization. Other items that are addressed in the CMP safeguards or direction to maintain budgetary limits, project risk, customer satisfaction, and overall productivity. The final elements of the CMP are reporting and performing closeout of the documentation to check all the requirements of the changes have been fully integrated and implemented.

· Overview: The Change Mange Plan (CMP) is a revision-controlled document for the business. For each Project the CMP document is tailored to the requirements of the single Project. The key members, roles, and responsibilities are detailed in the plan for use for the life of the Project.

· Location: The Change Manage Plan has been incorporated into this Project Management Plan as part of the Appendix B: Forms. (1) Change Management Plan Version 1.0; Dated 6/10/2020. (2) Change Management Request Form CR001-01, Revised 6/10/2020. Copies of each stand-alone document will be provided during Project Kickoff and all form templates can be found within the organization's Document Forms Database.

2.4 Deployment Plan

2.4.1 Deployment Overview

· Deployment Plan provides detailed information on the deployment of software and hardware. Include in the Deployment Plan are pre-release considerations, schedule and resource information, training and notification of deployment requirements, and operations and maintenance planning

· Users will be asked to back up their data 4 weeks prior to initial deployment

· All hardware including server/network racks, workstations, monitors, laptops, printers, software CDs/DVDs, new vehicles, new trailers, and their components/peripherals will be delivered by UPS 6 weeks prior to installation

· EIS system will be deployed to 10% of each type of users for feedback first prior to full scale installation

· Phase 2 & final installation will start after positive customer feedback has been received

· Pre-release considerations

· Assumptions/Dependencies/ Constraints

· Department managers will ensure access to buildings and server rooms will be provided with twenty-four-hour access as required. Hardware and materials will be available onsite prior to installation. All cabling and connectors will be procured through department accounts prior to Project.

· Each department's current system has been upgraded to handle the new additions of hardware for this Project. Each department manager has predetermined the locations and footprint for new hardware.

· Each vehicle and trailer will be upgraded with new hardware and software systematically when due for monthly maintenance at the service center.

· Design will be compatible and able to run on existing and new hardware.

· Software development will be complete before installation.

· Historical data from the old system, PBS, needs to be able to be imported into the new system.

· Old data is migrated to the new system prior to installation. Application analyst will be the lead for this effort.

· Testing is done prior to partial and full-scale system installations.

· End users are aware of installation schedule.

· Ensure clear communication of any anticipated disruption

· Feedback is handed out and collected to evaluate the success of the installation and address stakeholder needs.

· Allow up to 2 weeks for user training. Training is provided by vendor and included in the original cost.

· Deployment Schedule and Resources

Target Deployment & Sequence

Scheduled Release Dates

Resource Requirements/Responsible Personnel

Receive and Record software, hardware, new vehicle, and trailer models/serials/VINs for inventory

· Server/network racks

· Workstations

· Monitors

· Field laptops

· Printers

· Software (ABS and website CD/source code, training material)

· Microsoft Project Service, and Office Suite DVDs

· New vehicle

· Trailers

· New vehicles' and trailer's components

1.5 month prior to project completion

Project Manager

Technical Lead

Support staff

Data Migration

1 month prior

Technical Lead

Project Coordinator

User cooperation

Initial Deployment

3 weeks prior

Technical Lead

Vendor Technical Lead

4x on-site staff

1x remote access vehicle

1x trailer

Website

Phase 2 Deployment

2 weeks prior

Technical Lead

Vendor Technical Lead

18x on-site staff

1x remote access vehicle

4x trailers

Phase 3/Final Deployment

1 week prior

Technical Lead

Vendor Technical Lead

Left over (18x) on-site staff

Left-over remote access vehicle (if still not done)

Left over (5x) trailers

· Training

· Users Training: the week after each deployment. Training will be available as e-training and instructor-led (provided by vendor). Digital copy is available on shared drive for users who cannot make it to these training sessions. Technical Lead and support staff will be responsible for this task. Project Coordinator will work with both on-site and off-site staff to schedule appropriate training dates.

· IT Help Desk Training: Same as above.

· Notification of deployment

· Technical Lead will send out emails to all employees to let everyone know the installation dates and who will be affected

· Project Manager also informs stakeholders and management at staff meetings

· Operations and maintenance planning

· ABS EIS system and website will be maintained by local IT team and vendor's support team via phone or email

· Upgraded new vehicle and trailers will be maintained by the original manufacturer

· Submit a ticket at www.apexsystem.com/ithelpdesk or call 555-645-7891 if users experience issue or wish to add or remove content and/or function

· Possible Issues and Conflicts

· Any known issues or conflicts associated with the software and hardware, or other factors that negatively affect the deployment need to be documented and brought up to Technical Lead and Project Lead

· Documentation

· Documents used to support the deployment:

· Inventory List

· Support Issues Tracking Log

· Test Plan

· Support Training Plan

· Deployment Schedule

· User Feedback Form

3. UNEXPECTED EVENTS/ADDITIONAL WORK

3.1 PM690

3.1.1 Unexpected Event Change Request Submittal

3.2 PM691

3.2.1 Unexpected Event

3.2.2 Unexpected Event Impact:

3.2.3 Overall Conclusion to Project:

3.3 PM692

3.3.1 Unexpected Event:

3.3.2 Unexpected Event Impact:

3.3.3 Overall Conclusion to Project:

4. QUALITY MANAGEMENT

4.1 Roles and Responsibilities and Quality Tools

The primary roles and responsibilities of the project staff as it relates to the practice of Quality Management for the Project is listed in Table 1. The methods, processes, tools and techniques that will be used for quality management, and how they will integrate with other project processes (e.g. contract management, staffing management, communication management, decision analysis and resolution, cost management, subcontractor management, project monitoring and control, risk management, etc.) are listed in Table 2.

Table 1: Roles and Responsibilities

Name

Role

Quality Responsibility

Javier Nunez

Project Manager

Facilitate overall Quality Management plan; get final sign-off by Project Sponsor; coordinate project reviews

Vinh Nguyen

Project Coordinator

Facilitate the Quality Management tasks as outlined in the overarching Quality Management plan; participate in project reviews

Earl McMannis

Technical Lead

Coordinate with the Project Coordinator to facilitate the Quality Management tasks as they are related to the technical development aspects of the Project; auditing work products at milestone stages throughout development

George Nealy

Software Engineer

Coordinate with Technical Lead to ensure all software requirements and needs are met; develop/implement software solutions; troubleshoot software shortfalls

Table 2: Quality Management Processes

Quality Process

Tools & Techniques

Defining Quality

· Cause and effect diagram

· Flowchart

· Checksheet

· Pareto diagram and histogram (begin collecting the quality metrics that allow these to be created in the future)

· Control chart

· Scatter diagram (heavily used in quality testing)

Measuring Quality

· Benchmarking (software development)

· Statistical Sampling

· Brainstorming

· Force Field Analysis

Quality Management Outputs

· Quality Management Plan

· Quality Metrics

· Quality Checklist

· Process Improvement Plan

· Project Management Plan and Project Documents Updates

(Mulcahy, 2013)

4.2 Quality Planning

Under the ABS Project quality plan, the planning portion has been designed for the achievement of the list of requirements. The planning process will follow corporate quality policies and procedures applicable to the Project.

The quality management plan is subject to the following key components:

Objects of quality review

Quality Measure

Quality Evaluation Methods

Project Deliverables

Deliverable Quality Standards

Quality Control Activities

Project Processes

Process Quality Standards

Quality Assurance Activities

Detailed for each planning section for the quality management plan.

Project Deliverables and Project Processes

Deliverables:

· EIS- Requirements Document

· EIS- System Development

· EIS- System & User Acceptance Test

· EIS- Training Development

· EIS- Project Handoff/Closeout

· Company Website- Design Requirements

· Company Website- Website Development

· Company Website- Website Launch

· Vehicle Maintenance

· Microsoft Integration

Processes:

· Work Breakdown Structure

· Change Management of Control Management Plan

· Deployment Plan

· Schedule/Time Management Plan

· Quality Management Plan

Deliverable

Quality Standards

Deliverables:

· Enterprise Information System- Requirements Document

· Enterprise Information System- System Development

· Enterprise Information System- System & User Acceptance Test

· Enterprise Information System- Training Development

· Enterprise Information System- Project Handoff/Closeout

· Company Website- Design Requirements

· Company Website- Website Development

· Company Website- Website Launch

· Vehicle Maintenance

· Microsoft Integration

All Deliverable will be managed and measured against the customer's Specification and Statement of Work (SOW).

Processes:

· Work Breakdown Structure - WBS will be measured based on successful completion and availability of resources to complete.

· Change Management of Control Management Plan - Will be measured through data metrics for document cycle time and documentation errors.

· Deployment Plan - Will be measured by schedule.

· Schedule/Time Management Plan - Will be measured by successful completion of milestones.

Process

Quality Standards

Project Processes Standards:

· Initiation:

- Project Plan

- Project Plan Approval

· Planning:

- Scope Development

- Project Levels or Phases

- Project Scorecard Setup

- Budget Plan

- Risk Plan

- Change Management Plan

- Quality Management Plan

- All Planning Approvals

· Actions:

- Project Team Development

- Resource Allocation

- Quality Assurance

- Work Breakdown Structure

- Schedule

- Communication Channels

- Training

· Monitoring and Controls:

- Change Controls

- Quality Controls

- Verification and Validation Processes

- Reporting

· Closing:

- Final Acceptance of Deliverables

- Budget Finalization

- Schedule Completion

- Final Sign Off/Document Retention

Quality Control Activities

Key Control Activities:

- Data collection and analysis for all control measurements

- Establish Audit or Evaluation actions

- Determine corrective and countermeasure actions for improvement

- Verify and validate all control activities

- Review and Document all information based on corrective actions, analysis, and audits

Quality Assurance Activities

Key Quality Assurance Activities:

- Design and Development of software

- Implementation and Testing

- ABS, Website, and Vehicle Operation

- Maintenance

("Quality Management Plan (QMP)," 2014)

4.3 Quality Assurance

ABS is an Enterprise Resource Planning system that consists of multiple software packages composed of several modules, such as Payroll, Accounting, Purchasing, Bids and plans, General and Administrative Expenses, Project Management, Management Reports. The system will provide cross-organization integration of data through embedded business process (Arachchi et al., 2015). The quality assurance of ABS project focuses on the processes in building ABS products. In order to ensure quality, an iterative quality process will be used throughout the project life cycle. This iterative process includes measuring process metrics, analyzing process data, and continuously improving the processes.

The ABS Project Manager and the project team will perform assessments at planned intervals throughout the Project to ensure all processes are being correctly implemented and executed. Key performance metrics for the developing and implementing products include:

· Number of defects

· Number of requirement completion

· Development completion

· Test plan coverage

· Reliability, maintainability, and usability

The table below provides the key quality assurance metrics for the ABS Project.

Process Action

Acceptable Standards

Process Phase

Assessment Interval

Design and Develop software packages and system layouts in new trailers & vehicles

· Number of defects: 5/ KLOC

· Number of requirements completion: 95%

· Development completion: within 2 weeks of scheduled delivery date

· Positive feedback from each department representative

Design & Developing

Weekly or per development cycle

Implement & Testing

· Test Plan Coverage: 90%

· Portability: minimal effort to install and transfer software/hardware to remote vehicles

· Positive feedback from each department representative

Implementing & Testing

Per test event

ABS, website, and vehicle Operation & Maintenance

· Reliability:

· System up-time: 98.5%

· Program performing its intended function: 90% user satisfaction

· Data quality: 95% accuracy

· Maintainability:

· In compliance with Maintenance Plan

· Usability:

· 90% positive user response on usability of website and system interface

· Easy for new or infrequent users to learn to use

· All historical data is available and accessible

· Integrity:

· Unauthorized access can be detected and controlled

· Pass current industry security standards

Operation & Maintenance

Monthly

The quality manager will provide day-to-day quality management and conduct process audits on a weekly basis, monitor process performance metrics, and assure all processes comply with Project and organizational standards. If discrepancies are found, the quality manager will meet with the Project Manager and review identified discrepancies.

The Project Manager will schedule regularly occurring project, management, and document reviews to discuss any discrepancies, audit findings, and improvement initiatives. Process improvement is another aspect of quality assurance. All process improvement efforts must be documented, implemented, and communicated to all stakeholders as changes are made.

4.4 Quality Control

The quality control of the ABS project focuses on the quality of the integrated system, website, trailers, vehicles, and the acceptable standards and performance. ABS will include users from each department during planning and testing activities. All final products and related documentation will be reviewed and approved by the Quality Manager, Technical Lead, and the Project Manager during user acceptance test and Project close out to ensure compliance with established quality standards. The table below illustrates all performance and physical standards for the ABS products:

Product

Performance Standards

Quality Assessment

Activities

Assessment Intervals

ABS

· Availability

· Functionality

· Data Quality

· Maintainability

· Usability

· Integrity

· Checksheet

· Pareto diagram and histogram (begin collecting the quality metrics that allow these to be created in the future)

· Control chart

· Scatter diagram

· Feedback form from each department representative

· Verification Matrix

· Benchmarking

· Statistical Sampling

Weekly or per development cycle; verification assessment points as applicable

Website

· Availability

· Functionality

· Maintainability

· Accessibility

· Usability

· Integrity

Weekly or per development cycle; verification assessment points as applicable

Trailers

· Availability

· Functionality

· Accessibility

· Maintainability

· Usability

· Integrity

Weekly or per development cycle; verification assessment points as applicable

Vehicle

· Availability

· Functionality

· Accessibility

· Maintainability

· Usability

· Integrity

Weekly or per development cycle; verification assessment points as applicable

The project team will work with appropriate subject matter experts to ensure all requirements are met. The Technical Test Lead will perform testing and will provide the results back to the project team within 3 business days. The project team will ensure all physical and performance standards are met for each product, perform audits, and assist with creating or updating all documentation related to product quality.

The Project Manager will schedule regularly occurring project, management, and document reviews to discuss any discrepancies, audit findings, and improvement initiatives. It is imperative to the success of the Project that all of the physical and performance standards are met. By doing so, the ABS project team will ensure that the products achieve the high level of user satisfaction anticipated.

5. TIME MANAGEMENT PLAN

5.1 Time Management Plan Overview

Efficient time management is the productive use of your time that allows you to organize your days in a way that you complete your work with less energy. The significance of time management is the ability to maximize your time in the organization by using one of the five techniques: Bottom-Up Estimating, Top-Down Estimating, Comparative Estimating, Parametric Estimating & Three-Point Estimating. 

Bottom-up Estimating allows you to generate an estimate for a project. To examine from the "bottom-up," break down larger tasks into detailed tasks, with an estimate time needed to complete the task. Considering each job incrementally, assessing time requires each position is likely to be more reliable. You can later add up the total amount of time needed to execute the plan.

Top-down Estimating allows you to receive an overview of the expected timeline first, using past projects or previous experience as a model. It is beneficial to compare top-down estimates against your bottom-up forecast to ensure accuracy.

Comparative Estimating involves analyzing current or finished functions for which you have some measures of time and resources required. This method is based on experience rather than theory, but it is only useful if the similarity is legitimate.

Parametric Estimating allows you estimate the time required for one deliverable; and then multiply it by the number of deliverables required.

Three-Point Estimating enables you to build in a buffer for ambiguity or uncertainty. The Three-Point Estimates are – best case, worst case, and most likely. This method requires extra effort to create three separate views, that permits you to set a more rational and sensible expectations, based on realistic outcomes.

5.2 Schedule Plan

Schedule compression is the act of slimming down processes, or finding ways to run steps concurrently (Mulcahy, 2013). This Project is no different, and in order to maintain timelines the team is projecting the following plans in case schedule compression is needed. Schedule compression is best employed during the actual life of the Project since it is typically needed in ad hoc situations (Hall, n.d.). If processes run longer than expected, or there are delays that could not have be accounted for, compression must be done to get back in line with expectations (Hall, n.d.). The techniques our team will keep at the ready are Fast Tracking and Crashing. Beyond that, our Project Manager and Technical Lead will continuously look for simpler solutions to speed up activities as problems arise. Many of our solutions are being created by the software engineer and technical team, in the event compression is needed we the team can employ the crashing technique to purchase replacements. Resource Leveling and Resource Smoothing can also be employed to get back to the critical path of the Project by hitting minimums rather than using the best solutions (Mulcahy, 2013). By optimizing resources, we will reduce wait times for materials and speed up the process of employing those resources altogether. When possible, the team will employ both Fast Tracking and Crashing techniques such as purchasing solutions rather than creating them and running as many processes as we can along the critical path parallel to each other.

In order to know when the team must employ schedule compression techniques, we will reference the project baselines. Our project plan already identifies certain baselines which must be met to stay in line with stakeholder expectations. These baselines are:

· Original Scheduled Start and Finish Dates

· Planned Effort

· Planned Cost

These baselines are the teams overall measure of success. If any of these dates or numbers slip, we will face additional costs or running late on the Project. Baselines are used as a reference to success which is why they will be monitored closely and the Project Manager will employ schedule compression as needed throughout the Project to stay on course with the baselines.

In terms of dependent steps that are at risk, luckily much of the deployment plan is a parallel schedule that involves little dependency prior to final deployment. In the acquisitions phase some dependencies at risk are the required interactions between information systems, if the desired product is unable to be acquired or produced, there may be issues with interoperability. While those issues are being addressed, the team can still work on the off-site requirements as well as user training for the migration phase. The biggest preceding step that could postpone the Project is early user rollout. This step is used to ease the transition and provide a window for troubleshooting and testing. In the event prior testing found a problem, or if it is identified in the early user rollout, it will delay the overall migration and completion of the Project. In these situations, we will rely heavily on resource smoothing and the techniques of Crashing/Fast Tracking as applicable. Not all portions of the WBS that have dependent steps are on the critical path which means we can use the associated slack to fix the issues prior to moving on to the dependent work.

5.3 Critical Path:

The critical path is the longest total duration. Moreover, activities on the critical path cannot be delayed, or the whole Project will be delayed. The critical path has been shown below in the Gantt chart using red bars and arrows. The steps needed to create this Gantt chart include:

· Review the network diagram to ensure all activity relationships are complete

· Review the activity durations, resource assignments and skill levels required to complete each activity

· Review the project calendar and include project dependencies and constraints

· Develop the Gantt chart and determine the time scale and the symbols to identify the activity bars and milestones (PM4Dev.com, 2015)

As noted on this Gantt chart, this critical path has a total of 147 days. The activities on this path include:

· Requirement Documents

· System Development

· System and User Development Testing

· Training and Deployment

· Project Handoff and Closeout

Things that can impact this critical path

· Requirement Changes

· Budget Changes

· Technical issues and challenges during development and testing

5.4 Gantt Chart:

Plan schedule management – June 8 – June 21 (2wks)

Define Activities – June 22 – June 28 (1 wk)

Sequence Activities – June 29 – July 8 (1.5 wks)

Estimate Activities Resources July 9 – July 17 (1.3 wks)

Estimate Activity Duration – July 18 – July 26 (1.3wk)

Develop Schedule Process - July 27 – August 2 (1 wk)

Control Schedule Process – August 3 – August 9 (1 wk)

6. COST MANAGEMENT PLAN

6.1 Overview of Cost Management: For businesses to conduct prediction on coming expenses to reduce the chances of going over budget, cost management must be a part of the Project. Cost management is the method of estimating, distributing, and managing the costs on a project. Fees are determined during the planning phase of a project and must be approved before work has begun. This Project will be utilizing cost risk, and cost estimating as risk mitigation.

6.2 Cost Risks: A cost risk is any situation that can increase costs in a project due to estimation issues, or scope creep. The largest cost risks associated to this Project can be in the procurement of equipment, if for any reason the value of the equipment we need to purchase rises due to demand, we will not have sufficient funds in our projected budget. Another risk associated to this Project is the need for all equipment and software to work in concert. If even one of the information systems or models of IT equipment is incompatible, and ever worse if this is found out after acquiring it, additional costs will be faced. A third large cost risk is training and maintenance. Certain figures and estimations are attached to the amount of time and money that will be spent on user education and initial maintenance, if these projections are off or the users are more reluctant than we initially thought, additional costs may be incurred.

Contingency is a term used in many aspects of business, and even the military. A contingency is essentially an alternate plan, or a fallback to a situation that may occur. Reserves are pools of money that are set aside in order to cover gaps in a project (Chung, 2017). Contingency Reserves are used to cover the costs of projected risks that come to fruition (Chung, 2017). This money is typically set aside just in case, but for risks that have been previously identified (Chung, 2017). Essentially we are preparing ourselves for a bad situation which is why we are setting aside $100,000 for contingency reserves. These funds will be used to offset the failure of product implementation, the delay in remodeling of trailers, and in case our new purchases of equipment (field laptops, computers, monitors etc.) are insufficient or replacements are needed prior to project completion.

Management Reserves on the other hand are pools of money set aside by upper level management (Chung, 2017). These funds are to be used in the event a complete unknown incident occurs. Management funds are similar to the concept of a rainy day fund, instead of being hedged towards items on a risk register, they are truly funds set aside for the worst case scenario (Chung, 2017). Usually a fairly arbitrary number between 5-15% of the project budget is set aside in addition to anything used for a contingency. For the purpose of SCI the project team has been allocated 5% of the $1 Million budget which gives us $50,000 in management reserves initially. These funds will only be used for situations that arise outside of our risk management plan, and still leaves us with a buffer to avoid running over budget or behind schedule. Throughout the life-cycle of the Project the contingency reserves will slowly decrease and if the funds are not used, they will switch to management reserves. Since contingency reserves are meant for specific purposes, as those windows close meaning the risk is no longer a factor, the money can be used in other situations. See chart below.

6.3 Cost Estimates: There are many factors that are uncertain when cost estimating. The level of skill and experience available also play a vital role. The following techniques are what the team will use to do project cost estimation.

· Analogous Estimating

· Bottom-Up Estimating

· Statistical Modeling

· Three-Point Estimate

· Reserve Analysis

Once the needs of the Pinnacle Business Systems have been determined, the project team will finalize the resource and staffing requirements necessary for the successful completion of the Project. The Project Manager, the Technical Lead, and the Software Engineer will complete the WBS with the help of an internal cost analyst. Some WBS items that cannot be done by in-house personnel and might require the contractor team's assistance to do the cost estimate. Control account and staff labor categories will be created in each WBS element. Based on the labor costs and planned duration of each WBS element, an estimation will be determined (FAST Project Plan, n.d.). WBS element costs will then be totaled and compared with the funding of the Project. Since the project budget has been approved, the Project Manager still need to compare the allocation for each WBS element against the overall budget and adjust as necessary to comply with the budget objective and threshold. Once all the allocations have been reviewed and approved by the project manager and or management, the project cost will be baselined. The project cost baseline may only be changed with authorization by the Project Sponsor (FAST Project Plan, n.d.).

It is also critical that all project team members will need to record their work associated the PBS project. Tracking cost allows us to see where the potential problems may exist concerning project costs and this practice allows us to collect data to generate appropriate metrics and reports. To track cost throughout the project lifecycle, the Project Manager will collect all of the timesheets and calculate the labor costs associated with each cost account. Additionally, all associated invoices will be copied by the receiving department each month and sent to the Project Manager. The Project Manager will calculate the actual costs for all categories and compare them to the baseline costs on a monthly basis. These comparisons will be used to support variance analysis if needed.

The Project Manager will also collect the following metrics to capture and measure cost and schedule performance.

· Cost Performance Index (CPI) which will be reported monthly

· Schedule Performance Index (SPI) which will be reported monthly

· Control thresholds for CPI and SPI

Earned Value Metric

Yellow

Red

CPI

0.8 ≤ CPI ≤1.2

CPI < 0.8 or CPI >1.2

SPI

0.8 ≤ SPI ≤1.2

SPI < 0.8 or CPI >1.2

6.3.1 Breakdown Considerations: When estimating the project costs, there are a variety of costs that need to be estimated in order to come up with the total estimate for the cost of the Project. For our Project, the following costs need to be estimated:

· Costs of quality efforts

· Costs of risk efforts

· Costs of the project manager's time

· Costs of project management activities

· Costs directly associated with the Project, including labor, training for the new system, new environment requirements, etc.

· Any connected overhead costs

6.3.2 Project Requirements Breakdown: Costs related to SCI's new environment project will include:

· New Enterprise Information System creation

· $150,000

· 40 new workstations with each including:

· Corresponding equipment

· $2,300 per computer

· $150 per cable set

· Dual 19" flat screens

· $100 per screen

· Headset and webcams

· $70 per combo

· $2,720 per workstation

· $108,800 for all 40 workstations

· Two brand new Remote Office Vehicles with each including:

· $80,000 per custom ROV

· Three workstations in each ROV

· $2,720 per workstation

· $176,320

· 10 refurbished travel trailers with each including:

· $10,000 each

· Two workstations in each trailer

· $2,720 per workstation

· $154,400

· 10 field-use PEMA laptops

· $5,000 per laptop

· $50,000

· Company Website

· $1,500 startup fees

· Updated MS Project Server and MS Office Suite

· $1,000 MS PS

· $12.50 per user per month for MS OS

· $9,900 for first 12 months

· $10,900 (every 12 months)

6.3.3 Overall Costs:

· $1,000,000 - $1,400,000 budget

· $1,000,000 estimated for project expenses

· $651,920 for required for new environment

· Remaining $348,080 budgeted will be allocated for direct and indirect costs previously mentioned

· $150,000 reserves

· $100,000 Contingency

· $50,000 Management

7. COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT PLAN

7.1.1 Company Mission: To create and expand innovations by creating groundbreaking platforms, empowering businesses of all sizes on their transformation journey.

The mission is its purpose; a mission statement defines the products or services provided to customers or constituents, and stakeholders. Service Construction Inc. provides on-demand construction upgrades to companies to streamline everyday services.

7.1.2 Vision: Empowering our customers with the best product to maximize their potential one-solution at a time.

Vision is the positive impact that the organization wants to have; a vision statement is a formal description of its desired, long-term future state. Vision statements play a crucial role in driving change and performance in organizations (Kirkpatrick, 2004, 2009). Service Construction Inc.'s vision statement is significant because it states precisely our customers' demand with high-quality solutions.

7.2 Communication Matrix: This allows project managers to show how we plan to communicate information to the project audience. The matrix also includes the communication frequency, types, and methods (Biofore, 2011).

Given the medium size of the project team, communication is relatively simple. Team members will make sure to share a copy of all emails with the rest of the team. The project manager will document telephone calls, in-person and virtual meetings, and posts meeting minutes/notes to a shared workspace such as the company's SharePoint website or shared folder. The project manager will maintain a folder in Microsoft Office Outlook for all email correspondence. This will allow for status reports to be distributed biweekly via emails to the entire project team and key stakeholders. The information will include completed tasks, in-progress tasks with percent completed, upcoming assignments, and current risks/issues. Moreover, a report of earned value against the project baseline shall be included.

Audience

Information

Method

Frequency

Who Is Responsible

Project team; Project sponsor; Stakeholders

Introduce Project; Review objective and goals/Risk Report

In-person / Face-to-Face

Once

Project Manager

Project team

Detailed project status/Risk Report

Email

Weekly

Team leads

Project team

Collaboration

Meeting

Biweekly

Project Manager

Project team

Entrance/Exit Approval/ Variance Report

Email/Phone

As required

Project Manager

Stakeholders

Executive Report

Meeting

Monthly

Project Manager

Vendors

Detailed project status/Risk Report/Resources Report

Meeting

Weekly

Project Manager

Project team; Project sponsor; Stakeholders

Conclusion of Project/Variance Report

In-person / Face-to-Face

Once

Project Manager

7.3 Communication Report Types:

7.3.1 Project status report: A project status report tracks the progress of the project activities. The report provides effective communication between key stakeholders and the project team. See Appendix C for the Project Meeting form.

7.3.2 Risk Report: The risk management report identities the risk associated with the Project. The report details the risk level and ways to reduce the risk and manage them (Types of Project Reports | Sinnaps - Project Management Tool, n.d.).

7.3.3 Executive Reports: Executive report is a concise and brief report noting the Project's critical items. The report shows the essence of the information without getting into fine details (Malsam, 2018).

7.3.4 Resource Report: The resources report lets the project team and stakeholders understand how resources are handled throughout the Project. The information will show the breakdown by team members of what tasks are assigned. The report will show if there any problem if and resources are over-allocated.

7.3.5 Variance Reports: The variance report will show any deviation from the plan projection versus the actual results. The information can organize and collect data for the comparisons that can impact the budget and scope (Types of Project Reports | Sinnaps - Project Management Tool, n.d.). Appendix C for Project Meeting form.

8. RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN

9. STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT PLAN

APPENDIX A: REFERENCES

6 essential documents for project management success. (2019, May 21). Retrieved from

https://www.techrepublic.com/article/6-essential-documents-for-project-management-success/

Assumptions and Constraints in Project Management. (2019, August 5). Retrieved from

https://pmstudycircle.com/2012/10/assumptions-and-constraints-in-project-management/

Biafore, B. (2020, January 13). The Project Communication Plan. MPUG.

https://www.mpug.com/the-project-communication-plan/

Bowen, R. (n.d.). How are the work breakdown structures and change control connected?

Retrieved from https://www.brighthubpm.com/change-management/103650-the-connection-between-work-breakdown-structures-and-change-control/

Change Control Board: Process & Best Practices. (n.d.). Retrieved from

https://study.com/academy/lesson/change-control-board-process-best-practices.html

Chung, E. (2017, April 20). Contingency Reserve vs Management Reserve for PMP Exam. Edward-Designer.com. Retrieved from https://edward-designer.com/web/contingency- reserve-vs-management-reserve-for-pmp-exam/

Czajka, M. (n.d.). Schedule Variance Analysis. Global Training Institute. Retrieved January 29, 2021, from https://globaltraining.edu.au/global_training_institute/Resource_Library/Project Management Kit/Diploma Templates/Time Management/Schedule Variance Analysis WorksheetTemplate.doc

FAST Project Plans. (n.d.). Project Cost Management Plan Template. Retrieved from

http://www.fastprojectplans.com/cost-management-plan-template.html

Hall, H. (n.d.). 8 Proven Ways to Compress Project Schedules. Project Risk Coach. Retrieved from https://projectriskcoach.com/8-proven-ways-to-compress-project-schedules/

Kirkpatrick, S. A. (2017). Understanding the Role of Vision, Mission, and Values in the HPT

Model. Performance Improvement, 56(3), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21689

Malsam, W. (2018, November 21). How to write an executive summary (best format) –

projectmanager.com. ProjectManager.com. Retrieved January 25, 2021, from https://www.projectmanager.com/blog/write-an-executive-summary

Mathara Arachchi, Samantha & Chong, Siong-Choy & Madhushani, A & Alam, Shah & Ehsan,

Darul & Malysia, Malaysia. (2015). Quality Assurance and Quality Control in ERP Systems Implementation.

Mulcahy, R. (2013). PMP Exam Prep: Eighth Edition. RMC Publications.

PM4DEV (2015). Project Schedule Management PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR

DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS. Retrieved June 24, 2020, from

https://www.pm4dev.com/resources/free-e-books/6-project-schedule-management/file.html

Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge

(PMBOK guide 6TH Edition). Newtown Square, Pa: Project Management Institute.

Quality Management Plan (QMP). (2014, September 17). Retrieved from

http://acqnotes.com/acqnote/careerfields/quality-management-plan-qmp

Types of project reports | sinnaps - project management tool. (n.d.). Online Project Management.

Retrieved January 25, 2021, from https://www.sinnaps.com/en/project-management-blog/types-of-project-reports-for-disseminating-your-project-information-to-stakeholders

APPENDIX B: FORMS

-001 Change Management Plan Version 1.0; Dated 6/10/2020

-002 Change Management Request Form CR001-01, Revised 6/10/2020

Version 1.0

6/10/2020

APEX BUSINESS SYSTEMS PROJECT

Service Construction, Inc.

Change management Plan

Project Communication Plan

Project communication documents

Table 1.1 identifies the communication documents for this Project. The recipients of each preliminary and revised documents, the responsible individuals or identified role for generating and updating the documents, and the frequency of each document will be updated.

PROJECT COMMUNICATION TABLE 1.1

Document

Recipients

Responsibilities

Update frequency

Project Status Report

-Key Stakeholders

· Dan Black, CEO Apex Business Systems

· Walt Granger, Director of IT Service Construction, Inc.

-Senior Management

-Managers

-Team Leaders

-Designated Subcontractors

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Monthly

Risk Management Plan

-Key Stakeholders

-Senior Management

-Managers

Earl McMannis, Technical Lead

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Quarterly

Work Breakdown Structure

-Key Stakeholders

· Dan Black, CEO Apex Business Systems

· Walt Granger, Director of IT Service Construction, Inc.

-Senior Management

-Managers

-Team Leaders

-Designated Subcontractors

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

As Applicable

Change Request Log

- Change Control Designee

- Project Manager

-Technical Lead

-Managers

-Team Leaders

Vinh Nguyen

As Applicable

Project Schedule

-Key Stakeholders

· Dan Black, CEO Apex Business Systems

· Walt Granger, Director of IT Service Construction, Inc.

-Senior Management

-Managers

-Team Leaders

-Designated Subcontractors

Javier Nunez, Project Manager

Weekly

Project Communication Levels

Key member's roles and responsibilities for this Project are outlined based on the anticipated communication between roles, which are identified in the following diagram ("6 essential documents for project management success," 2019).

CHANGE AUTHORITY

The individuals or roles in the following table have authority to authorize changes or escalate to Change Control Board.

Team roles and responsibilities

Key Team Members

Role

Responsibilities

Earl McMannis

Technical Lead

- Oversee IT portion of the Project

- Facilitate technical discussions and manage daily challenges

- Participate in risk management

- Create and maintain technical documentation

- Work with PM and other departments to define resource

- Report and escalate to management IT related issues as needed

- Lead testing effort

- Develop and implement Project Plan

Javier Nunez

Project Manager

- Monitor progress and ensure the Project completing within established time frame and budget

- Allocate resources appropriately

- Analyze and manage project risks

- Report monthly project status to leadership and stakeholders

- Organize and motivate team

- Develop and implement Project Plan

Vinh Nguyen

Project Coordinator

- Maintain and monitor project plans, project schedules, work hours, budgets and expenditures

- Organize, attend and participate in all stakeholder meetings

- Document and follow up on important actions and decisions from meetings

- Develop and implement Project Plan

George Nealy

Software Engineer

- Oversee software creation and implementation

- Attend technical discussions and advise Technical Lead on software solutions and issues

- Participate in risk management

- Maintain original software and all documentation

- Work with PM and other departments to define resource requirements

- Report to Technical lead software issues as needed

- Lead software testing effort

- Develop and implement Project Plan

CHANGE CONTROL LOG

The following example Table 2.3 illustrates the information maintained on the Change Control Log.

· Date of Change Request submittal for review.

· Change Item Description; general description of change.

· Change Request Number; unique identifier in sequential order per Form CR001-01.

· Impact; any known impacts to the Project.

· Document Plan that will require updates.

Table 2.3

Date recorded

Change Item Description

Change Request Number

Impact

Documentation Plan

Date 1

Description

CR-XXXX-001

Impact

Plan

Date 2

Description

CR-XXXX-002

Impact

Plan

Date 3

Description

CR-XXXX-003

Impact

Plan

Change management process

Change management process steps

The change management process follows the established steps to document and approve changes to the Project. The change control document Form CR001-01 should be completed and submitted follow the approved steps.

Change management process flow

Change Control process definition of steps:

· Change Request Initiation – A change request form is prepared, formally submitted and logged

· Change Request Analysis – The change request is analyzed to determine if it has merit and should be considered. If so, additional analysis is conducted to determine what it will take to implement the change, identify project impacts, and provide any additional information that might aid decision-makers in granting or denying approval of the request

· Change Request Resolution/Approval – Decision-makers consider the results of the analysis and determine if the request should be approved, denied, or if more analysis is needed

· Change Request Implementation – Approved changes are planned, scheduled, resourced and implemented

· Change Request Verification and Closing – Implementation of the change is verified, and the change request is closed.

(Project Management Docs.com, Change Request Form, pg. 04.)

Change control board (CCB)

The individuals or roles in the following table have authority to authorize changes or escalate to Change Control Board.

· Chair - calls the board to order, runs the change control board meetings and has final approval on the changes

· Board members - can be from various projects or groups in the company; decide if the change is approved or rejected

· Evaluator - has the responsibility to evaluate how the change will affect scope, schedule and cost of the Project

· Originator - the person that is requesting a change to be approved; presents the information to board

· Modifier - responsible for making changes to the Project

· Project Manager - responsible for successful completion of the Project

· Verifier - ensures that approved changes were made

Role

Individual/Position

CCB Chair

VP, Operations

Board Members

3 to 5 selected team members

Evaluator

Proposal Team Member

Originator

Requestor

Modifier

Project Coordinator

Project Manager

Project Manager

Verifier

Designated Team Leader

("Change Control Board: Process & Best Practices," n.d.)

CHANGE REQUEST FORM CR001-01

APEX BUSINESS SYSTEMS PROJECT

FORM CR001-01 Project Change Request (CR)

Form Revision: -01, 09/19/2019

Change Request Submission Section

Change Request Title:

CR Number:

Change Request Category

☐ – Scope

☐ – Time

☐ – Cost

Originator Name

[Name]

Originator Organization

[Organization name]

Date Submitted

[XX/XX/XXXX]

Originator's Manager

[Manager name]

Primary Contact Person

[Name]

Backup Contact Person

[Name]

Primary Contact Email

[Email]

Backup Contact Email

[Email]

Priority: (Check One):

☐ 1 – Critical: Work stoppage or severe impact on productivity has occurred; solution needed immediately.

☐ 2 – High: Work stoppage or severe impact on productivity is eminent; solution needed before impact occurs.

☐ 3 – Medium: Impact on productivity is expected; workaround has been identified and solution is needed.

☐ 4 – Low: Impact on productivity is minimal; solution is needed.

Detailed Description of Proposed Change

Justification for Change

Current Workaround (if applicable)

Potential Cost Considerations

(if known)

Additional Information / Comments

Change Request Disposition

(CRC Use Only)

☐ Rework ☐ Not Accepted ☐ Withdrawn ☐ Deferred ☒ Approved for Implementation

Disposition Comments:

Signature: _____________________________________________

Date: ____________________

Change Request Analysis Section

CR Analyst (CRA)

[CR Analyst Name]

Date CRA Assigned

XX/XX/XXXX

Date CRA Due

XX/XX/XXXX

Date CRA Completed

XX/XX/XXXX

Impact Areas: (Check One or More)

☒ Project Cost Increase: Change will result in an increase to project costs.

☐ Project Cost Decrease: Change will result in a decrease to project costs.

☐ Scope Increase: Change will result in an increase to project scope of work.

☐ Scope Decrease: Change will result in a decrease to project scope of work.

☐ Schedule Change: Change will result in a change to the Master Project Schedule (MPS).

How much was increased or decreased in Cost, Scope, or Schedule

Solution Description and Impact on Baselined Items and the Project

Implementation Risks and Mitigation

Alternative Solutions Considered

Additional Information/Comments

Change Request Approval Section

Change Analysis Reviewed

(Name and Initials of representative from each team who reviewed CR Analysis)

Print Name: [Name]

Initials: [Initials]

Print Name: [Name]

Initials: [Initials]

Print Name: [Name]

Initials: [Initials]

Print Name: [Name]

Initials: [Initials]

Change Request Disposition

(CRC Use Only)

☐ Rework ☐ Not Accepted ☐ Withdrawn ☐ Deferred ☐ Approved for Implementation

Disposition Comments:

Signature: _____________________________________________

Date: ____________________

Change Request Tracking Section

Changes Implemented

(Change Analysis / Implementation Team Use Only)

Changes Verified

(Change Analysis / Implementation Team Use Only)

Change Request Closing Section

Change Request Disposition

(CRC Use Only)

☐ Closed

Disposition Comments:

Signature: _____________________________________________

Date: ____________________

(Project Management Docs.com, Change Request Form, pg. 11-13.)

APPENDIX C: Communication Plan Forms

How to Run a Project Meeting: 6 Important Tips [2 Free Templates]

Schedule Variance Analysis Worksheet/Template

Note: Variance Analysis involves comparing actual project results to planned or expected results. Cost and schedule variances are the most frequently analyzed, but variances from plan in the areas of scope, resource, quality, and risk are often of equal or greater importance.

Project Name:

Prepared by:

Date:

Reporting Period:

Project Activity Analyzed

Target Start/Finish Dates

Actual Start/Finish Dates

Amount of Schedule

Variance

Cause of Variance(s):

Anticipated Impacts:

Planned Corrective Action:

Signature

Name/Title:

Date:

Signature

Name/Title:

Date:

(Czajka, n.d.).

Reserve Allocation

Contingency Reserves

July August September October 100000 90000 70000 50000 Management Reserves

July August September October 50000 60000 80000 100000

28