Philosophy Paper/ 1 full page/Good reasoned argument /Well supported/APA / no plagiarism

Question 12 pts What is a common starting point in the argument that there are no objective moral facts?

There is variation inmoral beliefs and practices across cultures.

Common sense renders morality immune to refutation

Cultures hae established legal rights

Moral facts are a reflection of ordinary experience

There is consistency of moral beliefs and practices.

Flag this Question

Question 22 pts It is our ordinary inclination to view morality how?

As subjective

As negative

As skeptical

As personal

As objective

Flag this Question

Question 32 pts Who held that human beings are by nature social beings?

Aristotle

Maestri

Descartes

Glaucon

Nietzsche

Flag this Question

Question 42 pts Who held the belief that the powerful has a natural right to rule?

Nietzsche

Socrates

Aristotle

Plato

Descartes

Flag this Question

Question 52 pts According to Glaucon, in Plato's The Republic, morality can be described how?

A compromise between the best of all situations.

Following one's self-interest

What the most powerful in society want.

Adherence to moral facts

An inversion of what is considered ordinary

Flag this Question

Question 62 pts Which of the following is a difficulty encountered by ethics of duty?

Situations sometimes involve several conflicting moral principles.

It treats the maximization of pleasure as the ultimate goal of life.

It ignores the existence of inalienable rights.

It sees human fulfillment as the ultimate goal of life.

There is nothing that is always, in principle, right or wrong.

Flag this Question

Question 72 pts What is true about inalienable rights?

They belong to a person regardless.

They can be traded between people.

A person must earn them.

They are not the same for all people.

They can be bought.

Flag this Question

Question 82 pts Deontological ethics is also called the ethics of what?

Duty

Right

Pleasure

Good

Morality

Flag this Question

Question 92 pts What did Aristotle suggest was meant when we say something is good?

It satisfies the purpose for which it was made.

It is beneficial to our physical health.

It fits with our sense of right and wrong.

It is something that we like.

It satisfies our moral sense of what should be.

Flag this Question

Question 102 pts What type of dispute or theory is rejected by pragmatism as worthless?

One that has no implications for our lives and how we live them.

One that is based on empirical science

One that promotes the theories of natural selection.

One that does not recognize the existence of God

One that is not concerned with morality.