1. please find one qualitative and one quantitative scholarly article related to a healthcare issue of your choice.
1. please find one qualitative and one quantitative scholarly article related to a healthcare issue of your choice.
1. Submit a 4-5 pages APA-formatted paper (excluding front page and references):
1. Include an Introduction section that indicates the purpose of the paper
1. Identify how you addressed the issue of interest in two different articles (qualitative vs. quantitative)
1. Compare and contrast the articles concerning to:
0. Purpose of the Research Study
0. Research Question(s) and how it relates to the topic and healthcare issue of your choice
0. Sampling Process and Sample Size
0. Evaluate the appropriateness of qualitative and quantitative research design for a specific clinical practice question. Elaborate on which model of scholarly sources from qualitative and quantitative, or mix method you are planning on using to address the issue of your choice
0. Elaborate on how you could translate the research question/guidelines/ or recommendation and conclusion of the scholarly articles in your possible practicum site setting.
0. Elaborate on the differences between quality improvement, system change, research, and/or evidence-based practice initiatives
Purpose
This assignment aims to help the student search through the literature and select evidence-based literature to help translate science-based knowledge into practice to improve healthcare. The student will compare quantitative and qualitative research articles to determine how theory and research are linked and how translational science and evidence-based practice principles are transforming healthcare. Additionally, the student will explore the difference and similarities between qualitative and quantitative and how each can address a healthcare issue.
Assignment objective
· Demonstrate an understanding of the different levels of evidence.
·
· Directions and Grading Criteria
|
Category |
Points |
% |
Description |
|
Introduction |
10 |
10% |
Introduction paragraph is concise (approximately 5 sentences). A brief introduction is provided for each article being critiqued. The purpose of the paper is clearly conveyed/expressed through use of a formal purpose statement. |
|
Purpose of the Research Study/ Research Design |
10 |
10% |
Compare and contrast the research designs from each article. Critique appropriateness of the design used in relation to the research questions being asked in each article. Provide evidence to support research design appropriateness. |
|
Research Question(s) and how it relates to the topic and healthcare issue of your choice
|
10 |
10% |
Compare and contrast the research questions from the standpoint of a quantitative versus a qualitative inquiry. How do they differ? |
|
Sampling Process and Sample Size |
10 |
10% |
Compare and contrast the sampling process and size for each article. For example, what type of population was used? How were subjects recruited? What were inclusion and exclusion criteria, if any? Were the sample sizes for each article sufficient? Why or why not? |
|
Evaluate appropriateness of qualitative and quantitative research design for a specific clinical practice question. Elaborate on which model of scholarly sources from qualitative and quantitative, or mix method you are planning on using to address the issue of your choice
|
15 |
15% |
Elaborate on the appropriateness of the research design as it relates with your possible practicum health care topic. After reading the scholarly article, are you thinking of focusing the efforts of practice healthcare change improvement towards the healthcare providers versus the patients for example. |
|
Elaborate on how the research question/guidelines/ or recommendation and conclusion of the scholarly articles could be translated in your possible practicum site setting
|
15 |
15% |
Please reflect and elaborate on how the recommendations/conclusions/guidelines from the qualitative and quantitative article could be translated in a possible practicum site to help improve healthcare. |
|
Elaborate on the differences between quality improvement, system change, research, and/or evidence-based practice initiatives |
10 |
10% |
Compare and contrast the differences between quality improvement, system change, research, and/or evidence-based practice initiatives. |
|
Conclusion |
10 |
10% |
Summarize your own thoughts regarding the usefulness of quantitative and quantitative research when making a change in practice. |
|
APA formatting, scholarly writing |
10 |
10% |
Adheres to the rules of APA formatting, scholarly writing, spelling, and grammar. |
|
Maintain paper within length requirements |
Met/Not Met (Up to 10 points deducted if not met) |
Up to 10% if Not Met |
Adheres to the minimum/maximum page requirements of 4-5 pages (excluding title and reference pages). Note up to 10 points can be deducted for going over or under the page requirements for the assignment. |
|
Total |
100 |
100% |
A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |
·
·
·
Grading Rubric
|
Assignment Criteria |
A Outstanding or highest level of performance |
B Very good or high level of performance |
C Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
D/F Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance |
|
Introduction
10 points |
Fully introduces both articles. Remains clear and concise and includes formal purpose statement.
10 points |
Mostly introduces both articles. Mostly remains clear and concise and includes formal purpose statement.
8-9 points |
Minimally introduces both articles. Formal purpose statement is included.
5-7 points |
Fails to introduce both articles. Introduction is unclear and formal purpose statement is not included. 0-4 points |
|
Purpose of the Research Study/ Research Design
10 points
|
Fully compares and contrasts the research design for each article.
10 points |
Mostly compares and contrasts the research design for each article.
8-9 points |
Minimally compares and contrasts the research design for each article.
5-7 points |
Fails to compare and contrast the research design for each article. 0-4points |
|
Research Question(s) and how it relates to the topic and healthcare issue of your choice
10 points |
Fully compares and contrasts the research questions for each article in the context of how it could relate to the topic of the student’s choice.
10 points |
Mostly compares and contrasts the research questions for each article in the context how it could relate to the topic of the student’s choice.
8-9 points |
Minimally compares and contrasts research questions for each article in the context how it could relate to the topic of the student’s choice.
5-7 points |
Fails to compare and contrast the research questions for each article in the context how it could relate to the topic of the student’s choice. 0-4 points |
|
Sampling Process and Sample Size
10 points |
Fully compares and contrasts the sample selection and size for each article.
10 points |
Mostly compares and contrasts the sample selection and size for each article.
8-9 points |
Minimally compares and contrasts the sample selection and size for each article.
5-7 points |
Fails to compare and contrast the sample selection and size for each article. 0-4 points |
|
Evaluate appropriateness of qualitative and quantitative research design for a specific clinical practice question. Elaborate on which model of scholarly sources from qualitative and quantitative, or mix method you are planning on using to address the issue of your choice
15 points |
Fully evaluate appropriateness of qualitative and quantitative research design for a specific clinical practice question. Elaborate on which model of scholarly sources from qualitative and quantitative, or mix method you are planning on using to address the issue of your choice
13 - 15 points |
Mostly evaluate appropriateness of qualitative and quantitative research design for a specific clinical practice question. Elaborate on which model of scholarly sources from qualitative and quantitative, or mix method you are planning on using to address the issue of your choice 1
1-12 points |
Minimally evaluate appropriateness of qualitative and quantitative research design for a specific clinical practice question. Elaborate on which model of scholarly sources from qualitative and quantitative, or mix method you are planning on using to address the issue of your choice
9-10 points |
Fails to compare and contrast the methods of data analysis for each article.
0-8 points |
|
Elaborate on how the research question/guidelines/ or recommendation and conclusion of the scholarly articles could be translated in your possible practicum site setting
15 points |
Fully elaborate on how the research question/guidelines/ or recommendation and conclusion of the scholarly articles could be translated in your possible practicum site setting
13 - 15 points |
Mostly elaborate on how the research question/guidelines/ or recommendation and conclusion of the scholarly articles could be translated in your possible practicum site setting
11-12 points |
Minimally elaborate on how the research question/guidelines/ or recommendation and conclusion of the scholarly articles could be translated in your possible practicum site setting
9-10 points |
Fails elaborate on how the research question/ guidelines/ or recommendation and conclusion of the scholarly articles could be translated in your possible practicum site setting
0-8 points |
|
Elaborate on the differences between quality improvement, system change, research, and/or evidence-based practice initiatives
10 points |
Fully elaborate on the differences between quality improvement, system change, research, and/or evidence-based practice initiatives
10 points |
Mostly elaborate on the differences between quality improvement, system change, research, and/or evidence-based practice initiatives
8-9 points |
Minimally elaborate on the differences between quality improvement, system change, research, and/or evidence-based practice initiatives
5-7 points |
Fails to elaborate on the differences between quality improvement, system change, research, and/or evidence-based practice initiatives
0-4 points |
|
Summarization
10 points |
Summarize in detail the purpose of and the assignment. Include the DNP essentials explored with this assignment explaining how they are related to this assignment topic. Inclusion of the explored role-specific competencies as applicable.
10 points |
Mostly summarize in detail the purpose of and the assignment
Partially, Include the DNP essentials explored with this assignment explaining how they are related to this assignment topic. Inclusion of the explored role-specific competencies as applicable.
8-9 points |
Minimally summarize in detail the purpose of and the assignment
Student provided a list of the DNP essentials and role competencies explored with this assignment without explaining how they are related to this assignment topic.
5-7 points |
Failed to Summarize in detail the purpose of and the assignment.
Student no provided f the DNP essentials and role competencies explored with this assignment.
0-4 points |
|
APA formatting, scholarly writing
10 points |
Writes in a scholarly manner with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. Follows the rules of APA formatting.
10 points |
Writes in a scholarly manner with minimal grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. Follows the rules of APA formatting.
8-9 points |
Writes in a scholarly manner with several grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. Breaks minor rules of rules of APA formatting.
5-7 points |
Does not write in a scholarly manner. Has many errors in grammar, spelling and syntax. Does not follow rules for APA formatting. 0-4 points |
|
Maintains paper within length requirements
(Up to 10 points deducted if not met) |
Adheres to the minimum/maximum page requirements of 4-6 pages (excluding title and reference pages).
No point deduction
Met |
Paper is up to 1 page under or over the minimum/maximum page requirements of 4-6 pages (excluding title and reference pages).
4-5 point deduction per faculty discretion
Not Met |
Paper is 2 pages under or over the minimum/maximum page requirements of 4-6 pages (excluding title and reference pages).
6-8 point deduction per faculty discretion
Not Met |
Paper is 3 pages under or over the minimum/maximum page requirements of 4-5pages (excluding title and reference pages).
9-10 point deduction per faculty discretion
Not Met |
|
Total Points Possible = 100 points |
|