three..

Planning for Community and Organizational Change Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Identify the benefits of proposed health care system changes and its implications for a community.

Does not identify the benefits of proposed health care system changes and its implications for a community.

Identifies the benefits of proposed health care system changes, but the implications do not follow the logical order given the current and desired state of health care in the community.

Identifies the benefits of proposed health care system changes and its implications for a community.

Identifies the benefits of proposed health care system changes and its implications for a community. Articulates clear goals or outcomes for proposed changes that are well-supported by credible evidence.

Describe potential barriers to change in an organization or community.

Does not describe potential barriers to change in an organization or community.

Describes potential barriers to change, but the description is not grounded in applicable change theory.

Describes potential barriers to change in an organization or community.

Describes potential barriers to change in an organization or community. Identifies the causes of resistance and supports claims with credible evidence.

Develop strategies for changing barriers into opportunities and resolving conflict.

Does not develop strategies for changing barriers into opportunities and resolving conflict.

Develops strategies for changing barriers into opportunities and resolving conflict, but does not address a timeframe for change or lacks a coherent plan for communicating with stakeholders.

Develops strategies for changing barriers into opportunities and resolving conflict.

Develops strategies for changing barriers into opportunities and resolving conflict. Strategies reflect clear vision and drivers of change, including a viable approach for resolving conflict.

Develop a strategy for helping organizational stakeholders understand and evaluate the proposed changes to an existing health care system.

Does not develop a strategy for helping organizational stakeholders understand and evaluate the proposed changes to an existing health care system.

Develops a strategy that overlooks key stakeholders or that lacks insight into their influence on the proposed changes to an existing health care system.

Develops a strategy for helping organizational stakeholders understand and evaluate the proposed changes to an existing health care system.

Develops a strategy for helping organizational stakeholders understand and evaluate the proposed changes to an existing health care system. Describes the effects of these changes on the organization and identifies the specific information needs of the decision makers.

Develop a grant proposal and associated budget for a proposed change to an existing health care system.

Does not develop a grant proposal and associated budget for a proposed change to an existing health care system.

Develops a grant proposal and associated budget for a proposed change to an existing health care system that lacks clear and convincing justification or overlooks essential funding reflected in an incomplete list of necessary budget line items.

Develops a grant proposal and associated budget for a proposed change to an existing health care system.

Develops a grant proposal and associated budget for a proposed change to an existing health care system that presents a compelling argument for funding. Budget line items reflect clear and specific needs that are well-articulated and justified in the proposal.

Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.

Does not write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent

Writing lacks clarity or conciseness, is loosely structured, or includes errors in grammar, mechanics, or APA

Writes clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.

Writes clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style. Main points, ideas, arguments,

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED and appropriate form and style.

formatting that inhibit effective communication or detract from good scholarship.

or propositions are well- developed and engaging. Adheres to all applicable disciplinary and scholarly writing standards and conventions.

Support assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.

Does not support assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.

Sources lack relevance or credibility, or the evidence is not persuasive or explicitly supportive of assertions, arguments, propositions or conclusions.

Supports assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.

Supports assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Skillfully combines error- free source citations with a perceptive and accurate synthesis of the evidence.