Please view the attachment carefully and write a 4-5 pages paper about the case

Week 5 Assignment: Performance Report

Grading Rubric

Failing Below Average

Average Above Average Superior

0 - 60 (F range)

70 - 79 (C range)

80 - 89 (B range)

90 - 93 (A- range)

94 - 100 (A range)

Topical Content & Focus (65%)

Performance Report does not include the assessment of the change, a change form and/or does not includes accurate data from the Case Study Continuation worksheet. The appropriate material, as outlined in the assignment guidelines is not covered in the performance report, and the Case Study Continuation metrics may or may not be accurate and accurately interpreted and explained.

Performance Report includes a change form but does not include an assessment of the change, includes minimal accurate data from the Case Study Continuation worksheet. Most of the appropriate material, as outlined in the assignment guidelines is covered in the performance report, and the Case Study Continuation metrics are accurate and accurately interpreted

Performance Report includes the change form, and a cursory recommenda tion of the impact using data from the Case Study Continuation worksheet. All the appropriate material, as outlined in the assignment guidelines is covered in the performance report, and the Case Study Continuation metrics accurately interpreted

Assignment meets the expectations of ‘Average’ column, but shows a higher degree of understanding of in the interconnectedness between the various changes, their attributes, and integrates information from the case study in a detailed manner depicting the impact of the change.

Assignment meets the expectations of ‘Above Average’ column, but shows a stronger integration with the details of the case study and provides concrete and realistic recommendations that are appropriately defined and defended given the details and constraints of the case study.

and explained.

and explained.

Personal Competencies (15%)

• Critical thinking

• Professiona l Writing

• Quantitativ e analysis

• Problem Solving

Submission reflects little to no applicable personal competencies

Submission reflects a minimal applicable personal competencies

Submission reflects both applicable personal competencie s in an acceptable manner

Submission strongly reflects applicable personal competencies integrated throughout the assignment

Submission reflects an excellent use of applicable personal competencies integrated throughout the paper in a way that synthesizes the personal competencies

Grammar (10%)

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure, etc. that interfere with comprehensio n. The reader is unable to understand some of the intended meaning.

Frequent errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure, and/or other writing conventions that distract the reader.

Minimal errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure and/or other writing conventions but the reader is able to understand what the writer meant.

All work grammatically correct with rare misspellings.

All work grammatically correct with rare misspellings.

Formatting (10%)

NOTE: Gross failure to provide PROPER

Multiple errors in formatting and document is not formatted in a manner

A few errors in formatting and presentation of material is mostly well

Rare errors in formatting and formatting is consistent through the

Virtually no errors in formatting and makes good use of tables appropriately.

Virtually no errors in formatting and makes good use of tables appropriately.

citations and references – particularly with regard to direct quotes – will result in sanctions as outlined in the academic honesty policy.

consistent with the guidelines provided.

done, but either lacks professional formatting or clarity.

submission and in alignment with the guidelines by being presented in a clear and professional format.