Business Finance - Management HOMEWORK

Confronting Ethical Dilemmas: Part 1 Rubric [5 Levels] Course: PHL337 Ethics

Criteria Exemplary Proficent Competent Developing Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

Description or

account of

personal

ethical

dilemma

/ 11 point

Provides a

comprehensive

and detailed

description of

author's personal

ethical dilemma,

accurately

identifying all

relevant factors

and stakeholders

involved.

Presentation of

the dilemma is

well-organized,

engaging, and

thought-

provoking.

0.86 points

Provides a

detailed

description of

author's personal

ethical dilemma,

identifying most

of the relevant

factors and

stakeholders

involved.

Presentation of

the dilemma is

well-organized

and engaging in

parts.

0.74 points

Provides a

description of

author's personal

ethical dilemma,

identifying some

of the relevant

factors and

stakeholders

involved.

Presentation of

the dilemma is

generally

organized and

somewhat

engaging.

0.65 points

Provides a

limited

description of

author's personal

ethical dilemma,

identifying only a

few of the

relevant factors

and stakeholders

involved.

Presentation of

the dilemma is

poorly organized

and lacks

interest.

0.44 points

Provides an

inadequate or

very truncated

description of

author's personal

ethical dilemma,

failing to identify

relevant factors

and stakeholders

involved.

Presentation of

the dilemma is

unengaging and

demonstrates an

inability to

describe

personal

experience.

3/4/25, 6:44 PM Submission link: CED Part I - PHL337 Ethics - National University

https://nationalu.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=603944&grpid=0&isprv=&bp=0&ou=104781 1/5

Criteria Exemplary Proficent Competent Developing Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

Reflection on

Experience

/ 1

Effort and

originality

/ 2

1 point

Reflection is

deep, detailed,

and insightful,

demonstrating a

high level of

critical thinking

and self-

awareness.

0.86 points

Reflection is

detailed and

thoughtful,

demonstrating an

ability to analyze

and evaluate the

situation.

0.74 points

Reflection is

adequate,

demonstrating an

ability to

consider

different

perspectives.

0.65 points

Reflection is

limited,

demonstrating a

lack of depth and

critical thinking.

0.44 points

Reflection is

absent or

superficial,

demonstrating a

lack of

understanding or

critical thinking.

2 points

Effort and

originality are

exceptional,

demonstrating a

strong

commitment to

the purpose and

goal of the

assignment as

well as an ability

to think

creatively.

1.72 points

Effort and

originality are

solid,

demonstrating a

good

understanding of

the purpose of

the assignment

and an ability to

think creatively.

1.48 points

Effort and

originality are

satisfactory,

demonstrating a

basic

understanding of

the purpose of

the assignment

and an attempt

to think

creatively.

1.3 points

Evidence of

some effort is

present, and

originality is

minimal,

demonstrating a

lack of

understanding of

the purpose of

the assignment

and a lack of

creativity.

0 points

Effort is minimal,

demonstrating a

need for

improvement in

understanding

the assignment.

May include

plagiarized

sections.

3/4/25, 6:44 PM Submission link: CED Part I - PHL337 Ethics - National University

https://nationalu.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=603944&grpid=0&isprv=&bp=0&ou=104781 2/5

Total / 5

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary Proficent Competent Developing Unsatisfactory Criterion Score

Fulfills

assignment

requirements

/ 11 point

Fulfills all

assignment

requirements

with precision

and exceptional

clarity.

0.85 points

Fulfills all

assignment

requirements

with accuracy

and clarity.

0.74 points

Basic fulfillment

of all assignment

requirements

with some

accuracy.

0.65 points

Partial fulfillment

of assignment

requirements

with limited

accuracy.

0 points

Fails to fulfill

assignment

requirements.

Exemplary 4.7 points minimum

Proficient 4 points minimum

Competent 3.5 points minimum

Developing 3 points minimum

Unsatisfactory 0 points minimum

3/4/25, 6:44 PM Submission link: CED Part I - PHL337 Ethics - National University

https://nationalu.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=603944&grpid=0&isprv=&bp=0&ou=104781 3/5

3/4/25, 6:44 PM Submission link: CED Part I - PHL337 Ethics - National University

https://nationalu.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=603944&grpid=0&isprv=&bp=0&ou=104781 4/5

3/4/25, 6:44 PM Submission link: CED Part I - PHL337 Ethics - National University

https://nationalu.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=603944&grpid=0&isprv=&bp=0&ou=104781 5/5