Nutrition & Hydration
euro1776
PHI3633-Module6Assignmenti.docxModule 6 Assignment i
Due: Wed Jun 21, 2023 11:59pmDue: Wed Jun 21, 2023 11:59pm
Ungraded, 100 Possible Points100 Possible Points
Attempt
IN PROGRESS
Next Up: Submit Assignment
Add Comment
Unlimited Attempts Allowed
Details
Nutrition & Hydration/Persistent Vegetative State (PVS)
After studying the course materials located on Module 6: Lecture Materials & Resources page, answer the following:
1. Cure / care: compare and contrast.
2. Basic care: Nutrition, hydration, shelter, human interaction.
· Are we morally obliged to this? Why? Example
3. Swallow test, describe; when is it indicated?
4. When is medically assisted N/H indicated?
· Briefly describe Enteral Nutrition (EN), including:
· NJ tube
· NG tube
· PEG
· Briefly describe Parenteral Nutrition (PN), including:
· a. Total parenteral nutrition
· b. Partial parenteral nutrition
5. Bioethical analysis of N/H; state the basic principle and briefly describe the two exceptions.
6. Case Study: Terry Schiavo (EXCEL FILE on Module 6: Lecture Materials & Resources page). Provide a bioethical analysis of her case; should we continue with the PEG or not? Why yes or why not?
7. Read and summarize ERD paragraphs #: 32, 33, 34, 56, 57, 58.
Submission Instructions:
· The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.
· If references are used, please cite properly according to the current APA style. Refer to your syllabus for further detail or contact your instructor.
· You can expect feedback and grading from the instructor before the next assignment is due.
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
View Rubric
|
Essay/Paper Rubric |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Essay/Paper Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
Identification of Main Issues/Problems view longer description |
30 pts Distinguished Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems. 27 pts Excellent Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems. 26 pts Fair Identifies and demonstrates a fair understanding of most of the issues/problems. 24 pts Acceptable Identifies and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of most of the issues/problems. 21 pts Unacceptable Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems. |
/ 30 pts |
|
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms view longer description |
25 pts Distinguished Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 23 pts Excellent Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems. 21 pts Fair Presents a superficial analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 19 pts Acceptable Presents an acceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 17 pts Unacceptable Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. |
/ 25 pts |
|
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding view longer description |
25 pts Distinguished Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding. 23 pts Excellent Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 20 pts Fair Provides competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 18 pts Acceptable Provides acceptable responses to all issues/problems, lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 17 pts Unacceptable Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. |
/ 25 pts |
|
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature view longer description |
10 pts Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. 8 pts Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. 6 pts Fair Superficially uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. 4 pts Acceptable Acceptable uses of the literature and other resources to inform their work. Lack of use of citations and extended referencing. 2 pts Unacceptable Unacceptable uses of the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. |
/ 10 pts |
|
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines view longer description |
10 pts Full Marks Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. 8 pts Excellent Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 6 pts Fair Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 4 pts Acceptable Demonstrate an acceptable level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 2 pts Unacceptable Demonstrates an unacceptable level of writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. |
/ 10 pts |
|
Total Points: 0 |
