Week 1 Assignment

I am not sure what is going on in this essay, but it certainly does not adhere to the assignment instructions. You are not asked to summarize and evaluate two articles discussing opposing positions on an ethical issue, but to formulate an ethical question, two opposing answers, and then give reasons for those answers. More practically, I cannot evaluate a paper that does not stick to the assigned structure, simply because the rubric is not set up for this. You will have to rewrite this assignment. 

(0.00 / 1.00); : Identifies the Ethical Question

Non-Performance - The ethical question is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

(0.00 / 2.00); : Introduces the Topic and Question

Basic - Partially introduces the topic and question, referencing an idea, quote, or analysis of the issue from one of the required resources on the topic. The introduction is underdeveloped.  

(0.00 / 2.00); : Formulates A Position Statement

Non-Performance - The position statement is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

(0.00 / 2.00); : Explains the Strongest Reasons in Support of the Position Statement

Non-Performance - The explanation of a strong reason in support of the position statement is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

(0.00 / 2.00); : Formulates an Opposing Position Statement

(0.00 / 2.00); : Explains the Strongest Reasons in Support of the Opposing Position Statement

(0.00 / 0.25); : Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

(0.00 / 0.25); : Written Communication: APA Formatting

(0.00 / 0.25); : Written Communication: Word Requirement

(0.00 / 0.25); : Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Overall Score: 0.00 / 12.00 Overall Grade: 0