Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

profilerenol81
PHI-413Rubric-WorldviewAnalysisandPersonalInventory.pdf

Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory - Rubric

1. Christian Perspective of the Nature of Spirituality and Ethics 25 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics

5. Target 25 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics

demonstrates a thorough, concise, and exceptional understanding of the concepts.

Explanation is supported with references to relevant textbook chapter and topic

Resources.

4. Acceptable 21.25 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics

demonstrates a clear understanding extending beyond the surface of the concepts.

Explanation is supported with references to relevant textbook chapter and topic

Resources.

3. Approaching 18.75 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics

demonstrates a basic understanding of the concepts. Explanation is supported with

references to relevant textbook chapter and topic Resources.

2. Insufficient 16.25 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics is a

copy of information from the textbook chapter and topic Resources that

demonstrates a poor understanding of the concepts.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics does

not demonstrate knowledge of the concepts as presented in the textbook chapter

and topic Resources or explanation is not provided.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

2. Scientism and Arguments 25 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of scientism and description of two main arguments against scientism

5. Target 25 points

Explanation of scientism and description of two main arguments against scientism

demonstrate a thorough, concise, and exceptional understanding of the concepts.

Explanation is supported with references to relevant textbook chapter and topic

Resources.

4. Acceptable 21.25 points

Explanation of scientism and description of two main arguments against scientism

demonstrate a clear understanding extending beyond the surface of the concepts.

Explanation is supported with references to relevant textbook chapter and topic

Resources.

3. Approaching 18.75 points

Explanation of scientism and description of two main arguments against scientism

demonstrate a basic understanding of the concepts. Explanation is supported with

references to relevant textbook chapter and topic Resources.

2. Insufficient 16.25 points

Explanation of scientism and description of two main arguments against scientism

are a copy of information from the textbook chapter and topic Resources that

demonstrates a poor understanding of the concepts.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Explanation of scientism and description of two main arguments against scientism

do not demonstrate knowledge of the concepts as presented in the textbook

chapter and topic Resources or explanation is not provided.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

3. a. Personal Worldview - Ultimate Reality 5 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of ultimate reality

5. Target 5 points

Explanation demonstrates a thorough, concise, and exceptional understanding of

ultimate reality.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

Explanation demonstrates a deep understanding of ultimate reality.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Explanation demonstrates a basic understanding of ultimate reality.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Explanation demonstrates poor understanding of ultimate reality.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Explanation does not demonstrate an understanding of ultimate reality or

explanation is not provided.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

3. b. Personal Worldview - Nature (Origin) of the Universe 5 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of the nature (origin) of the universe

5. Target 5 points

Explanation demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the nature (origin) of

the universe.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

Explanation demonstrates a deep understanding of the nature (origin) of the

universe.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Explanation demonstrates a basic understanding of the nature (origin) of the

universe.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Explanation demonstrates poor understanding of the nature (origin) of the

universe.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Explanation does not demonstrate an understanding of the nature (origin) of the

universe or explanation is not provided.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

3. c. Personal Worldview - What It Means to Be a Human Being 5 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of what it means to be a human being and if there is purpose in human

life and existence

5. Target 5 points

Explanation demonstrates an exceptional understanding of what it means to be a

human being and if there is purpose in human life and existence.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

Explanation demonstrates a deep understanding of what it means to be a human

being and if there is purpose in human life and existence.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Explanation demonstrates a basic understanding of what it means to be a human

being and if there is purpose in human life and existence.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Explanation demonstrates poor understanding of what it means to be a human

being and if there is purpose in human life and existence.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Explanation does not demonstrate an understanding of what it means to be a

human being and if there is purpose in human life and existence or explanation is

not provided.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

3. e. Personal Worldview – What Knowledge Is 5 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of what knowledge is and what the sources of knowledge are

5. Target 5 points

Explanation demonstrates an exceptional understanding of what knowledge is and

what the sources of knowledge are.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

Explanation demonstrates a deep understanding of what knowledge is and what

the sources of knowledge are.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Explanation demonstrates a basic understanding of what knowledge is and what

the sources of knowledge are.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Explanation demonstrates poor understanding of what knowledge is and what the

sources of knowledge are.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Explanation does not demonstrate an understanding of what knowledge is and

what the sources of knowledge are or explanation is not provided.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

3. e. Personal Worldview – Ethics, Right, and Wrong 5 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of ethics and where the knowledge of right and wrong comes from

5. Target 5 points

Explanation of ethics and where the knowledge of right and wrong comes from

demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the related concepts.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

Explanation of ethics and where the knowledge of right and wrong comes from

demonstrates a deep understanding of the related concepts.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Explanation of ethics and where the knowledge of right and wrong comes from

demonstrates a basic understanding of the related concepts.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Explanation of ethics and where the knowledge of right and wrong comes from

demonstrates poor understanding of the related concepts.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Explanation of ethics and where the knowledge of right and wrong comes from

does not demonstrate an understanding of the related concepts or explanation is

not provided.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

3. f. Personal Worldview – Purpose of Personal Human Life and Existence 5 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of the purpose of personal human life and existence

5. Target 5 points

Explanation demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the purpose of personal

human life and existence.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

Explanation demonstrates a deep understanding of the purpose of personal human

life and existence.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Explanation demonstrates a basic understanding of the purpose of personal human

life and existence.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Explanation demonstrates poor understanding of the purpose of personal human

life and existence.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Explanation does not demonstrate an understanding of the purpose of personal

human life and existence, or explanation is not provided.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

4. Professional Practice 10 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of the influence of personal worldview values in decision-making within

current or future professional practice

5. Target 10 points

Explanation demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the influence of

personal worldview values in decision-making within current or future professional

practice.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

Explanation demonstrates a deep understanding of the influence of personal

worldview values in decision-making within current or future professional practice.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

Explanation demonstrates a basic understanding of the influence of personal

worldview values in decision-making within current or future professional practice.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

Explanation demonstrates poor understanding of the influence of personal

worldview values in decision-making within current or future professional practice.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Explanation does not demonstrate an understanding of the influence of personal

worldview values in decision-making within current or future professional practice,

or explanation is not provided.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 6 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 5.1 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 4.5 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 3.9 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Format/Documentation 4 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 4 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 3.4 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 3 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 2.6 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 100 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.