Effective Management of Tuberculosis/ PHE4095 WEEK 4 PROJECT

PHE4095 WEEK 4 PROJECT RUBRIC ASSESSMENT

Criteria

No Submission

0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (1-13)

13 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-15)

15 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-17)

17 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20)

20 points

Criterion Score

Describes the selected current public health issue (either environmental or occupational).

Student did not submit assignment

Details of the selected current public health issue are missing or inaccurate.

Details of the selected current public health issue are vague or incomplete.

Details of the selected current public health issue are somewhat vague or incomplete.

Details of the selected current public health issue are complete and comprehensive.

/ 20

Explain the significance of monitoring the prevalence of MDR-TB among Category II pulmonary tuberculosis patients.

Student did not submit assignment

Details of the significance of monitoring the prevalence of MDR-TB among Category II pulmonary tuberculosis patients are missing or inaccurate.

Details of the significance of monitoring the prevalence of MDR-TB among Category II pulmonary tuberculosis patients are vague or incomplete.

Details of the significance of monitoring the prevalence of MDR-TB among Category II pulmonary tuberculosis patients are somewhat vague or incomplete.

Details of the significance of monitoring the prevalence of MDR-TB among Category II pulmonary tuberculosis patients are complete and comprehensive.

/ 20

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

No Submission

0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (1-6)

6 points

Satisfactory (C Range)

7 points

Proficient (B Range)

8 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9-10)

10 points

Criterion Score

Describe the methodology of the study in journal article and how the study sample was selected.

Student did not submit assignment

Details of the methodology of the study in journal article and how the study sample was selected are missing or inaccurate.

Details of the methodology of the study in journal article and how the study sample was selected are vague or incomplete.

Details of the methodology of the study in journal article and how the study sample was selected are present but more could have been used to provide better application to the issue.

Details of the methodology of the study in journal article and how the study sample was selected are present to support the issue.

/ 10

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

No Submission

0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (1-13)

13 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-15)

15 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-17)

17 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20)

20 points

Criterion Score

Analyze the study’s findings as they relate to the effective management of tuberculosis.

Student did not submit assignment

Details of how the study’s findings relate to the effective management of tuberculosis are missing or inaccurate.

Details of how the study’s findings relate to the effective management of tuberculosis are vague or incomplete.

Details of how the study’s findings relate to the effective management of tuberculosis are present but more could have been used to provide better discussion to the issue.

Details of how the study’s findings relate to the effective management of tuberculosis are present to support the issue

/ 20

Justify how the results of the study can improve rapid detection of MDR-TB.

Student did not submit assignment

Details of how the results of the study can improve rapid detection of MDR-TB are missing or inaccurate.

Details of how the results of the study can improve rapid detection of MDR-TB are vague or incomplete.

Details of how the results of the study can improve rapid detection of MDR-TB are present but more could have been used to provide better discussion to the issue.

Details of how the results of the study can improve rapid detection of MDR-TB are present to support the issue.

/ 20

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

No Submission

0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (1-6)

6 points

Satisfactory (C Range)

7 points

Proficient (B Range)

8 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9-10)

10 points

Criterion Score

Summarize the results of the study.

Student did not submit assignment

A summary of the study is missing or inaccurate.

A summary of the study is vague or incomplete.

A summary of the study is present but more could have been used to provide better discussion to the issue.

A summary of the study is present to support the issue.

/ 10

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

No Submission

0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (1-13)

13 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-15)

15 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-17)

17 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20)

20 points

Criterion Score

Written Components

Student did not submit assignment

Introduction is limited or missing entirely.

Poorly organized document.

Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.

Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension.

No attempt at APA formatting.

Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.

Poorly organized document that interferes with readability and comprehension.

Transitions are sporadic.

Conclusion is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that interferes with readability and comprehension.

APA format demonstrates attempt to paraphrase, quote, and cite; but errors are significant.

Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic.

Loosely organized document that may have to be inferred.

Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.

Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.

Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension.

APA format demonstrates attempt to paraphrase, quote, and cite; but a few errors present.

Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background information, and clearly states the topic.

Well organized document with an appropriate introduction.

Transitions are thoughtful and clearly show how ideas relate.

Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.

Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout that helps establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic.

APA format is used throughout when appropriate or called for.

/ 20

Rubric Total ScoreTotal

/ 120

Overall Score

Overall Score

No Submission0 points minimum

Emerging (F through D Range)1 point minimum

Satisfactory (C Range)70 points minimum

Proficient (B Range)80 points minimum

Exemplary (A Range)90 points minimum