Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

profilebutterflyl
PERSONALPHILOSOPHYOFNURSINGPRACTICE.docx

PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING PRACTICE

A group of medical professionals smiling  Description automatically generated

This Assignment, which you began in Week 1 and continued developing in Week 2, will be due by Day 7 of this week (Week 3). As you put the finishing touches on your personal philosophy of nursing practice, consider how interdisciplinary theories may enrich or help clarify your philosophy statement.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare

· Review and reflect on your philosophy of nursing practice that you have been developing or revising over the past 2 weeks. Make any revisions you think will improve it.

· Consider the ways in which your personal philosophy is informed by theory and research.

· Review the middle-range nursing theories you applied to your personal philosophy of nursing practice. Make any revisions you think will improve it.

· Consider the interdisciplinary theories you identified for the Discussion this week and how they may or may not be applicable to your personal philosophy of nursing practice.

· Consider other interdisciplinary theories and how they may be applicable to your personal philosophy of nursing practice.

· Think about how you will integrate interdisciplinary theories to strengthen or deepen the ways in which nursing science informs your personal philosophy of nursing practice.

The Assignment (3–5 pages)

In a 3- to 5-page paper (not including cover page and references page), describe your personal philosophy of nursing practice, including explanations of:

· How your personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing

· How your personal philosophy aligns with Walden’s mission of social change

· How your personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework

· How at least  two  middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice (Be specific and provide examples.)

· How at least  two  interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice (Be specific and provide examples.)

Note: Use this week’s Learning Resources to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and style for all references and citations. The College of Nursing requires that all papers include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. Use the  College of Nursing Writing TemplateLinks to an external site.  for your Assignment submission.

By day 7 Of Week 3

Submit your Assignment.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the  Turnitin Drafts from the  Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as  WK3Assgn_LastName_FirstInitial

2. Then, click on  Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on  Upload File and select  Submit Assignment for review.

· File Upload

· Text Entry

Top of Form

Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded.

Upload FileUse Webcam

 Add Another File

Click here to find a file you've already uploaded

I agree to the tool's  End-User License Agreement.Links to an external site.

This assignment submission is my own, original work

Cancel Submit Assignment

Bottom of Form

Rubric

NURS_8114_Week3_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8114_Week3_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how your personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing

25 to >22.5 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how their personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

22.5 to >20.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains how their personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

20 to >17.5 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely how their personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

17.5 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how their personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how your personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework

25 to >22.5 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how their personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

22.5 to >20.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains how their personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

20 to >17.5 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how their personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

17.5 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how their personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice

25 to >22.5 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

22.5 to >20.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

20 to >17.5 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

17.5 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice

25 to >22.5 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

22.5 to >20.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

20 to >17.5 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

17.5 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. 90% of the time. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 70% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

7 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 70% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

7 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

7 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

10 pts

Total Points: 130

Previous Next

image1.jpeg