Search for hospitals within a 50-mile radius of the community where you are working or had your prelicensure clinical experiences.

PerformanceMeasurementPowerPointSlideShow.docx

Home >Nursing homework help >Search for hospitals within a 50-mile radius of the community where you are working or had your prelicensure clinical experiences.

This is a POWERPOINT PRESENTATION

1. Review information found on the following website related to hospital compare http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/HospitalCompare.html (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

2. Read the information carefully and then locate the following website. http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

3. Search for hospitals within a 50-mile radius of the community where you are working or had your prelicensure clinical experiences. Type in your zip code(11216). Select your hospital and two others. Select hospitals/facilities and choose compare. If you live in a remote area and there are no hospitals listed within a 50-mile radius, select a zip code for a family member or a close friend who does not live near you. The idea is to review comparative data.

4. Click on the following topics to learn more.

a. Survey of patient's experiences

b. Timely and effective care (focus your search on two of the conditions that apply to services provided at the hospitals)

c. Readmissions, complications, and deaths

5. Carefully read the information provided.

6. Develop a PowerPoint slideshow consisting of 8-10 slides. Include the following, keeping in mind what all this data means.

a. Title slide with information pertinent to the course.

b. List reasons to recommend the website Hospital Compare to consumers (patients).

c. List reasons to recommend the website Hospital Compare to staff who may seek employment.

7. For the slides below, clearly label the name of each hospital:

a. Summarize patient experiences data for each hospital.

b. Summarize timely and effective care data for two conditions.

c. Summarize data for readmissions and complications and deaths.

d. List recommendations for improving data for one selected facility.

e. Summarize what you learned from this experience.

Best Practices in Preparing PowerPoint Presentations

The following are best practices in preparing this presentation.

· Be creative.

· Incorporate graphics, clip art, or photographs to increase interest.

· Make easy to read with short bullet points and large font.

· Review directions thoroughly.

· Proofread prior to final submission.

· Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.

· Abide by the Chamberlain academic integrity policy.

**Academic Integrity Reminder**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.

Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

NOTE: Please use your browser's File setting to save or print this page.

Rubric

NR447_Performance_Measurement Sept 18

NR447_Performance_Measurement Sept 18

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle slide

Slide contains pertinent information related to assignment, course, student, date, and faculty member.

10.0 pts

Slide contains all pertinent information related to assignment, course, student, date, and faculty member

9.0 pts

Slide contains most information; however, one component is missing.

8.0 pts

Slide contains most information; however, two to three components are missing.

4.0 pts

Slide contains some information; and more than three components are missing or slide is missing.

0.0 pts

Title slide is missing.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasons to recommend hospital compare to patients

Format of reasons is logical, easy to read, and specific.

20.0 pts

At least four reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are directly related to the patient’s perspective.

18.0 pts

Three reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are mostly related to the patient’s perspective.

16.0 pts

Two reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are somewhat related to patient’s perspective.

8.0 pts

One reason is included but is not logical or easy to read and is not from the patient’s perspective.

0.0 pts

No reasons given are given to recommend hospital compare to patients.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasons to recommend hospital compare to staff

Format of reasons is logical, easy to read, and specific.

30.0 pts

At least four reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are directly related to the potential staff member’s perspective.

26.0 pts

Three reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are mostly related to the potential staff member’s perspective.

24.0 pts

Two reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are somewhat related to the potential staff member’s perspective.

11.0 pts

One reason is included but is not logical or easy to read and is not from the potential staff member’s perspective.

0.0 pts

No reasons are given to recommend hospital care to potential staff members.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize data related to patient experiences

Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C and data related to patient experiences is displayed.

30.0 pts

Three hospitals are listed and data related to patient experiences are thoroughly displayed.

26.0 pts

Three hospitals are listed data related to patient experiences are clearly displayed.

24.0 pts

Three hospitals are listed and data related to patient experiences are briefly displayed.

11.0 pts

Three hospitals are included but data related to patient experiences are difficult to ascertain.

0.0 pts

Fewer than three hospitals are summarized and no data related to patient experiences are included.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize data related to timely and effective care

Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C. Two different conditions are named and applied to hospitals A, B, and C.

30.0 pts

Three hospitals are listed. Two different conditions are named and concisely applied to the hospitals.

26.0 pts

Three hospitals are listed. Two different conditions are named and somewhat applied to the hospitals.

24.0 pts

Three hospitals are listed. One condition is named and somewhat applied to the hospitals.

11.0 pts

Only one or two hospitals are listed and labeled appropriately. Only one condition is named and applied

0.0 pts

No hospitals are listed or labeled, and no conditions are named or applied.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths

Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C. Data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths are appropriately displayed.

30.0 pts

Three hospitals are listed and data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths are thoroughly displayed.

26.0 pts

Three hospitals are listed and data related to readmissions, complications and deaths is clearly displayed.

24.0 pts

Three hospitals are listed and data related to readmissions or complications or deaths (but not all three) is briefly displayed.

11.0 pts

Only one or two hospitals are selected but data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths are difficult to ascertain.

0.0 pts

No hospitals are summarized and no data are provided.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations for improving data for one facility

Either hospital A, B, or C is specified, or recommendations for improving data are appropriately displayed.

20.0 pts

One of three hospitals is selected. Five or more recommendations for improving data are listed and thoroughly described.

18.0 pts

One of three hospitals is selected. Three to four recommendations for improving data are listed and clearly described.

16.0 pts

One of three hospitals is selected. Two recommendations for improving data are listed and briefly described.

8.0 pts

One of three hospitals is listed. One recommendation for improving data is listed.

0.0 pts

No hospitals are listed and no recommendations for improving data are listed.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of learning related to this assignment

Learning about completing this assignment is stated. Summary of learning is displayed with lists, bulleted items, or other creative ways.

20.0 pts

Thoroughly summarizes learning related to performance measurement assignment, including value of data.

18.0 pts

Generally summarizes learning related to performance measurement assignment, including value of data.

16.0 pts

Briefly summarizes learning related to performance measurement assignment; including value of data.

8.0 pts

Minimally summarizes learning related to performance measurement assignment; does NOT include value of data.

0.0 pts

Summary of learning related to performance measurement assignment, including value of data, is missing or so brief that understanding of concepts is difficult to ascertain.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly writing and formatting

Slides are provided and labeled appropriately. Punctuation and sentence structure are correct. There is evidence of spell and grammar check.

10.0 pts

All slides are provided and grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. There is evidence of spell and grammar check.

9.0 pts

Minimal errors in grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted. Minimal indicators of spelling or grammar errors.

8.0 pts

Several errors in grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted. There are several indicators of spelling or grammar errors.

5.0 pts

Numerous errors in punctuation, or sentence structure noted. There are many indicators of spelling or grammar errors.

0.0 pts

Many errors in writing to the extent that it is difficult to understand the meaning of the information presented on the slides.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePower Point Use

0.0 pts

0 points deducted

Power Point Used. 0 points deducted

0.0 pts

20 (10%) points lost

Power Point not used as presentation template results in 20 (10%) points deducted from points possible. 20 points deducted

0.0 pts

Total Points: 200.0

Previous Next