MS project scheduling and salvaging a project
penwil
Penny-61.xlsxSheet1
| Comments | Possible | Percentage | ActualPoints | ||||||||||
| Project charter contains all of the needed elements. | 84 | 100 | 84 | ||||||||||
| Communication plan is sound for the project. | 42 | 100 | 42 | ||||||||||
| Scope is defined | 28 | 100 | 28 | ||||||||||
| WBS is incorporated into paper in chart format | 84 | 100 | 84 | ||||||||||
| Some APA errors. | 14 | 95 | 13.3 | ||||||||||
| Some writing errors | 28 | 95 | 26.6 | ||||||||||
| Subtotal | 278 | ||||||||||||
| Late penalty | 0 | ||||||||||||
| Total | 278 | ||||||||||||
| Instructor comments: Penny, The project charter outlines the details and elements of the project clearly. Scope could be defined more specifically. The WBS is reasonable and serves as a guide for project flow. There are some minor writing errors. Excellent work, overall! Dr. Young | |||||||||||||
|
Points: 280 |
Assignment 1: Planning Document |
|
|
|
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 70% F |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Construct a project charter to revamp the compensation and benefits package. Weight: 30% |
Did not submit or incompletely constructed a project charter to revamp the compensation and benefits package. |
Partially constructed a project charter to revamp the compensation and benefits package. |
Satisfactorily constructed a project charter to revamp the compensation and benefits package. |
Thoroughly constructed a project charter to revamp the compensation and benefits package. |
|
2. Design a communication plan for the project. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely designed a communication plan for the project. |
Partially designed a communication plan for the project. |
Satisfactorily designed a communication plan for the project. |
Thoroughly designed a communication plan for the project. |
|
3. Define the scope of the project. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely defined the scope of the project. |
Partially defined the scope of the project. |
Satisfactorily defined the scope of the project. |
Thoroughly defined the scope of the project. |
|
4. Create a work breakdown structure including numbered components. Weight: 30% |
Did not submit or incompletely created a work breakdown structure including numbered components. |
Partially created a work breakdown structure including numbered components. |
Satisfactorily created a work breakdown structure including numbered components. |
Thoroughly created a work breakdown structure including numbered components. |
|
5. Four (4) References Weight: 5% |
No references provided. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
6. Clarity and writing mechanics Weight: 10% |
More than 6 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |
Points: 280 Assignment 1: Planning Document Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F
Fair 70-79% C
Proficient 80-89% B
Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Construct a project charter to revamp the compensation and benefits package. Weight: 30%
Did not submit or incompletely constructed a project charter to revamp the compensation and benefits package.
Partially constructed a project charter to revamp the compensation and benefits package.
Satisfactorily constructed a project charter to revamp the compensation and benefits package.
Thoroughly constructed a project charter to revamp the compensation and benefits package.
2. Design a communication plan for the project. Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely designed a communication plan for the project.
Partially designed a communication plan for the project.
Satisfactorily designed a communication plan for the project.
Thoroughly designed a communication plan for the project.
3. Define the scope of the project. Weight: 10%
Did not submit or incompletely defined the scope of the project.
Partially defined the scope of the project.
Satisfactorily defined the scope of the project.
Thoroughly defined the scope of the project.
4. Create a work breakdown structure including numbered components. Weight: 30%
Did not submit or incompletely created a work breakdown structure including numbered components.
Partially created a work breakdown structure including numbered components.
Satisfactorily created a work breakdown structure including numbered components.
Thoroughly created a work breakdown structure including numbered components.
5. Four (4) References Weight: 5%
No references provided.
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
6. Clarity and writing mechanics Weight: 10%
More than 6 errors present
5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present
Points: 280 Assignment 1: Planning Document
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Construct a project
charter to revamp the
compensation and
benefits package.
Weight: 30%
Did not submit or
incompletely
constructed a
project charter to
revamp the
compensation and
benefits package.
Partially
constructed a
project charter to
revamp the
compensation and
benefits package.
Satisfactorily
constructed a project
charter to revamp
the compensation
and benefits
package.
Thoroughly constructed a
project charter to revamp the
compensation and benefits
package.
2. Design a
communication plan
for the
project. Weight: 15%
Did not submit or
incompletely
designed a
communication
plan for the
project.
Partially designed
a communication
plan for the
project.
Satisfactorily
designed a
communication plan
for the project.
Thoroughly designed a
communication plan for the
project.
3. Define the scope
of the project.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or
incompletely
defined the scope
of the project.
Partially defined
the scope of the
project.
Satisfactorily defined
the scope of the
project.
Thoroughly defined the
scope of the project.
4. Create a work
breakdown structure
including numbered
components.
Weight: 30%
Did not submit or
incompletely
created a work
breakdown
structure including
numbered
components.
Partially created a
work breakdown
structure including
numbered
components.
Satisfactorily created
a work breakdown
structure including
numbered
components.
Thoroughly created a work
breakdown structure
including numbered
components.
5. Four (4)
References
Weight: 5%
No references
provided.
Does not meet the
required number
of references;
some or all
references poor
quality choices.
Meets number of
required references;
all references high
quality choices.
Exceeds number of required
references; all references
high quality choices.
6. Clarity and writing
mechanics
Weight: 10%
More than 6 errors
present
5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present
