Peer review Hw

2. Is the problem and purpose clearly identified and explained? If so, how? If not, where are there problems? Be specific and give detail.

3. If there is a background section, does it make sense and has it acclimated you to the history of the issue successfully? If so, how/why. If not, where are the problems? Are they missing a background where there really should be one? Is the background too detailed and causes a loss in focus? If they have no background and one is not needed, please put N/A for this question.

4. Explanations and details are clear and make logical sense. If so, why? If not, where are there problems? Be specific and detailed.

5. Are the sources relevant, credible, explained and sourced properly? If not, where are there problems? Be specific and detailed.

6. Do you have any other suggestions/items you would like to address that are not covered by the above 5 questions? If so, please discuss them here.

7. Give three specific problems you see in their report with details to support your position/findings--if this were a real issue, what would you have problems with before accepting the writer's report--imagine this is a $100,000.00 contract--would your classmate's report be enough to win the bid or get the approval. If you believe there are less than three problems, be sure to write why you believe the writer's report is PERFECT!