Peer Review
chiosa
PeerReviewBrianMcNeil.docxPeer Review Rubric
Community Policing
Meets or Exceeds Established Assignment Criteria
|
Grading Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Awarded |
|
An introduction with a clear thesis statement |
15 |
Fill in |
Provide feedback for your score in this category here. Why did you take points off or why did you provide full points? Include constructive (positive) comments and recommendations.
|
Grading Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Awarded |
|
Project includes all required topics: Community Organization, Community Partnerships, Cross-Cultural Challenges, Humanitarian Considerations, Volunteers, Roadblocks, Future Vision, Challenges, and Improvements |
15 |
Fill in |
Provide feedback for your score in this category here. Why did you take points off or why did you provide full points? Include constructive (positive) comments and recommendations.
|
Grading Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Awarded |
|
Meets project presentation requirements: Paper – 5-7 pages Presentation - 8-10 minutes presentation including visual elements (graphics, pictures, etc.), 150-200 notes per slide, and recorded voice Speech - 8-10 minutes and a written script of the narrative |
15 |
Fill in |
Provide feedback for your score in this category here. Why did you take points off or why did you provide full points? Include constructive (positive) comments and recommendations.
Clearly Presents Well-Reasoned Ideas and Concepts
|
Grading Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Awarded |
|
Evidence supporting claims cited throughout the project |
15 |
Fill in |
Provide feedback for your score in this category here. Why did you take points off or why did you provide full points? Include constructive (positive) comments and recommendations.
|
Grading Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Awarded |
|
Used a minimum of 10 reputable sources |
15 |
Fill in |
Provide feedback for your score in this category here. Why did you take points off or why did you provide full points? Include constructive (positive) comments and recommendations.
Quality of Project
|
Grading Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Awarded |
|
Academic and professional tone and appearance |
15 |
Fill in |
Provide feedback for your score in this category here. Why did you take points off or why did you provide full points? Include constructive (positive) comments and recommendations.
|
Grading Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Awarded |
|
Grammar and proofreading |
10 |
Fill in |
Provide feedback for your score in this category here. Why did you take points off or why did you provide full points? Include constructive (positive) comments and recommendations.
Conclusion
|
Grading Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Awarded |
|
Total |
100 |
Fill in |
Provide an overall conclusion and impression of your peer’s paper. What did your peer do right? What could they improve? This should include recommendations and constructive comments to help your peer improve.
