Peer response to Rinchin Lama:” why Homosexuals need to be legalized to adopt children”.
A. To be honest, the topic is very interesting. It is my first time that I see and read about this topic. I really enjoyed from reading this topic. I never read anything about Homosexuals, but this topic was amazing for me.
B. "Currently, no empirical evidence demonstrates that living with a gay or lesbian parent has any significant negative effects on children". The topic is very clear, and the introduction tells the reader what to expect from the paper. the argument is good as well.
C. in this paper the writer argues very good and beside the writer give very good examples. The argument is logical. Totally agree with the arguments and the examples.
D. This paper is MLA formatting. The pager number are correct. I don’t see any obvious errors in the formatting and beside that the writer didn’t use the word “you” in the paper. The entries are in ABC orders.
E. The author used direct quotes in the essay and beside this the author explained in his/her own language that make the essay more interesting. The writer also has a good balance of information through out the paper. the source is creditable and cited in page entries and is on MLA format guideline.
F. The whole essay was very clear. Nothing was confusing for me. I really enjoyed from reading this topic. But I have a question from the writer. I myself don’t have any problem with gay or lesbians. I will really support them, but the question is. If a gay couple adopt a child how can they take of them? I think lesbian can take care of the children efficiently than gay couple.
G. I dot have any specific suggestions in this essay. Everything is good. I don’t see any serious problems in issues, tone, mood or clarity. Everything is clear and interesting.
Silvia3375
peerreview.docx
0
