peer review
John_nai
PeerFeedbackonPitchProposalDraftAssignment.docxPeer Feedback on Pitch Proposal Draft
MGMT 3183: Entrepreneurship
Review the proposals of the two other students that I have assigned you and provide them with constructive feedback by answering the following questions and completing the rubric (fill in the yellow parts).
Your Name: Click or tap here to enter text.
Pitcher’s Name: Click or tap here to enter text.
|
Criteria |
Above Average |
Average |
Below Average |
Points Awarded |
|
Description of proposed business |
14 to 20 points |
7 to 13 points |
0 to 6 points |
|
|
|
Description of the business is thorough and clear; provides a good understanding of the product or service and suggests viability |
Description of the business is somewhat difficult to understand or is lacking some aspects, leaving significant confusion and uncertainty; viability is uncertain |
Description of the business is significantly lacking clarity and multiple aspects are missing, resulting in little or no understanding of the product or service and an inability to determine viability |
Click or tap here to enter text. |
|
Explanation of problem or opportunity |
14 to 20 points |
7 to 13 points |
0 to 6 points |
|
|
|
Clear identification and explanation of problem or opportunity and how the product or service will capitalize on it |
Problem or opportunity is identified but not sufficiently explained; relationship of product or service with problem or opportunity is somewhat unclear |
Problem or opportunity is not explained; relationship of product or service with the problem or opportunity is not explained |
Click or tap here to enter text. |
|
Explanation of target market |
14 to 20 points |
7 to 13 points |
0 to 6 points |
|
|
|
Target market, including existing or potential competitors, is identified and clearly explained |
Target market and competitors are partially identified and/or insufficiently explained |
Target market and competitors are largely unidentified and not explained |
Click or tap here to enter text. |
|
Funding model |
10 to 15 points |
5 to 9 points |
0 to 4 points |
|
|
|
Funding needed for venture is explained, including a description of sources of existing funding (e.g., own investment) |
Funding needed for venture is only partially explained |
Funding needed for venture is not addressed |
Click or tap here to enter text. |
|
Team members |
7 to 10 points |
4 to 6 points |
0 to 3 points |
|
|
|
Team members and their key roles are clearly identified |
Team members are identified by key roles are not addressed |
Team members and their roles are not addressed |
Click or tap here to enter text. |
|
Fluency and clarity |
10 to 15 points |
5 to 9 points |
0 to 4 points |
|
|
|
Proposal is written in clear, understandable language without errors |
Proposal is mostly clear and understandable with minimal errors |
Proposal has significant fluency and clarity problems with significant errors |
Click or tap here to enter text. |
· After reading this proposal, what questions do you have? What are you uncertain about?
Click or tap here to enter text.
· What do you feel are the strengths of this business? Of this proposal?
Click or tap here to enter text.
· What do you feel are the weaknesses of this business? Of this proposal? If possible, offer suggestions for how the author might shore these up.
Click or tap here to enter text.
· Do you see any neat twists or extensions that might strengthen this business further?
Click or tap here to enter text.
· Do a last check, have they covered the five required parts (description of the business, explanation of problem/opportunity, explanation of target market, funding needed, team members)? Any fluency or clarity problems?
Click or tap here to enter text.
Pitch #2
Pitcher’s Name: Click or tap here to enter text.
|
Criteria |
Above Average |
Average |
Below Average |
Points Awarded |
|
Description of proposed business |
14 to 20 points |
7 to 13 points |
0 to 6 points |
|
|
|
Description of the business is thorough and clear; provides a good understanding of the product or service and suggests viability |
Description of the business is somewhat difficult to understand or is lacking some aspects, leaving significant confusion and uncertainty; viability is uncertain |
Description of the business is significantly lacking clarity and multiple aspects are missing, resulting in little or no understanding of the product or service and an inability to determine viability |
Click or tap here to enter text. |
|
Explanation of problem or opportunity |
14 to 20 points |
7 to 13 points |
0 to 6 points |
|
|
|
Clear identification and explanation of problem or opportunity and how the product or service will capitalize on it |
Problem or opportunity is identified but not sufficiently explained; relationship of product or service with problem or opportunity is somewhat unclear |
Problem or opportunity is not explained; relationship of product or service with the problem or opportunity is not explained |
Click or tap here to enter text. |
|
Explanation of target market |
14 to 20 points |
7 to 13 points |
0 to 6 points |
|
|
|
Target market, including existing or potential competitors, is identified and clearly explained |
Target market and competitors are partially identified and/or insufficiently explained |
Target market and competitors are largely unidentified and not explained |
Click or tap here to enter text. |
|
Funding model |
10 to 15 points |
5 to 9 points |
0 to 4 points |
|
|
|
Funding needed for venture is explained, including a description of sources of existing funding (e.g., own investment) |
Funding needed for venture is only partially explained |
Funding needed for venture is not addressed |
Click or tap here to enter text. |
|
Team members |
7 to 10 points |
4 to 6 points |
0 to 3 points |
|
|
|
Team members and their key roles are clearly identified |
Team members are identified by key roles are not addressed |
Team members and their roles are not addressed |
Click or tap here to enter text. |
|
Fluency and clarity |
10 to 15 points |
5 to 9 points |
0 to 4 points |
|
|
|
Proposal is written in clear, understandable language without errors |
Proposal is mostly clear and understandable with minimal errors |
Proposal has significant fluency and clarity problems with significant errors |
Click or tap here to enter text. |
· After reading this proposal, what questions do you have? What are you uncertain about?
Click or tap here to enter text.
· What do you feel are the strengths of this business? Of this proposal?
Click or tap here to enter text.
· What do you feel are the weaknesses of this business? Of this proposal? If possible, offer suggestions for how the author might shore these up.
Click or tap here to enter text.
· Do you see any neat twists or extensions that might strengthen this business further?
Click or tap here to enter text.
· Do a last check, have they covered the five required parts (description of the business, explanation of problem/opportunity, explanation of target market, funding needed, team members)? Any fluency or clarity problems?
Click or tap here to enter text.
