Use this form to give feedback to your peer’s Executive Summary Draft.
Peer’s Name: _____Mary Ashofrd______________________________
Evaluator Name: ___Tiffany Smith______________________________
· Does your peer explain his/her selected healthcare organization, problems, solutions, and goals, (or obstacles/opportunities and action plan) clearly?
Tiffany describes ABC Behavioral Health with detailed information about its mission, vision, nature of the business, services/products, and customers served. She also identifies three key issues and proposes workable solutions. Even though she presents three goals, these three goals are not necessarily SMART goals. Obstacles and opportunities are not graded in week 3, but Tiffany presents clear obstacles and vibrant opportunities.
· Was there anything in this ES Draft that was confusing? If so, what was it? How could this be improved?
As mentioned above, three goals are not SMART goals. Each goal should contain specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and timely elements. The first goal does not include time element. The 2nd goal is not specific. The 3rd goal might not be attainable.
· What details does your peer include? How and why these details are important?
Tiffany did a fantastic job providing comprehensive information regarding ABC Behavioral Health. It lays the solid foundation for the problems and the rest of information.
· What is good about your peer’s writing (i.e. content, organization of information, etc.)? Explain why it is good?
In this ES Draft, Tiffany uses bulleted points to list all key information with full details. It is very easy to read and follow her messages. Tiffany also applies APA so well.
· Do you notice any errors that should be corrected? If so, what should be corrected?
There are a couple of minor grammatical errors. The pronoun for a patient is “he/she”—not “they.”
· What are some recommendations for improvement (i. e. content, organization of information, etc.) that you would make? Please explain why you would make these recommendations?
It seems that Tiffany has put a great deal of time and efforts into her ES Draft. This ES Draft contains valuable insights concerning ABC Behavioral Health. As mentioned previously, each of the three goals does not include all five elements, which is the main weakness in this ES Draft. In the reference list, the majority of sources are online articles. It is recommended that Tiffany include more scholarly sources that were published in the past five years to support her claims. Overall, this ES Draft demonstrates Tiffany’s ability to present her knowledge in a meaningful way.