Nursing peer review
PEER REVIEWER TEMPLATE
|
Assignment Content Possible Points = 90 Points
|
Excellent |
V. Good
|
Satisfactory |
Needs Improvement |
Unsatisfactory |
Peer Reviewer: [insert name]
|
|
|
100% |
91% |
83% |
50% |
0% |
Presenter: [insert name] |
|
Disease & Background The student: 1. Identifies the disease condition 2. Gives a brief statement of incidence and prevalence in the US 3. The student briefly summarizes the disease pathophysiology 4. Identifies the typical clinical presentation seen in a patient with the disease (4 critical elements) |
15 Points |
14 Points |
12 Points |
8 Points |
0 Points |
REVIEWER COMMENTS |
|
|
All 4 critical elements are present and complete |
All 4 critical elements are present, but some information may be only partially addressed or inaccurate |
3 critical elements are present |
2 critical elements are present |
1 or less critical element is present |
Start here…. |
|
Applicability in Primary Care The student: 1. Identifies the author, organization or group that developed the CPG 2. Student denotes the year of the original guideline publication 3. Student identifies any subsequent revisions (student’s reference should be the most recent version), and 4. Student discusses the applicability for use of this CPG in the primary care setting (4 critical elements) |
15 Points |
14 Points |
12 Points |
8 Points |
0 Points |
REVIEWER COMMENTS |
|
|
All 4 critical elements are present and complete |
All 4 critical elements are present, but some information may be only partially addressed or inaccurate |
3 critical elements are present |
2 critical elements are present |
1 or less critical elements are present |
|
|
Key Action Statements & Body of Evidence The student: 1. Provides each of the CPG’s “Key Action” or “Guideline Statements” up to a maximum of 5 relevant recommendations 2. Provides the body of evidence strength for each, and 3. If the statement has applicability to other groups, only discuss the relevant primary care ones (3 critical elements) |
30 Points |
26 Points |
24 Points |
12 Points |
0 Points |
REVIEWER COMMENTS |
|
|
All 3 critical elements are present and complete |
All 3 critical elements are addressed but some information may be only partially addressed, or not completely accurate
|
Only 2 critical elements are present |
Only 1 critical element is present |
Zero (0) critical elements are present
|
|
|
Application in Clinical 1. Using an example of a patient from their clinical rotation with the same condition 2. Student discusses how the diagnosis and treatment of their patient compared to the recommendations given in the guidelines 3. Specific examples of what was done well or what could have been done better is noted (3 critical elements) |
30 Points |
26 Points |
24 Points |
12 Points |
0 Points |
REVIEWER COMMENTS |
|
|
All 3 critical elements are present and complete |
All 3 critical elements are addressed but some information may only be partially addressed
|
Only 2 critical elements are present |
Only 1 critical element is present |
Zero (0) critical elements are present
|
|
|
Assignment Content Subtotal |
_____of 90 Points |
|
YOU MUST ALSO USE THE PEER REVIEW ASSIGNMENT RUBRIC TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THIS ASSIGNMENT