PowerPoint slides
Pecha Kucha Presentation Rubric
|
|
Exemplary |
Accomplished |
Developing |
Beginning |
|
Slideshow (15 pts) |
The presentation has 20 slides timed to advance every 20 seconds. The presentation runs flawlessly. |
The presentation has 20 slides timed to advance every 20 seconds. The presentation runs with one minor technical flaw. |
The presentation has 20 slides timed to advance every 20 seconds, but the presentation has several minor technical flaws. |
The presentation does not have 20 slides timed to advance every 20 seconds, OR the presentation has major technical flaws. |
|
Philosophical Analysis (30 pts) |
Student gives a thorough and detailed analysis that fully addresses the article in all of its complexity. |
Student analyzes the key issues and details but ignores qualifying points. |
Student gives a partial analysis and/or overlooks key issues that are connected to the central philosophical issue. |
Little or no attempt made to identify the correct philosophical issues. |
|
Organization (30 pts) |
The Pecha Kucha was extremely organized and the ideas and images flowed in a manner that was easily followed and understood. The material transitioned seamlessly from slide to slide. |
The Pecha Kucha was fairly organized and the ideas flowed well. There were perhaps jumps and transitions that were not entirely seamless. Easily understood. |
The Pecha Kucha was poorly organized and not easy to follow. Ideas and images were put together in a way that made comprehension difficult. |
The Pecha Kucha was unorganized and difficult to follow. Ideas and images were put together with little thought to audience understanding. |
|
Visual Appeal and Creativity (30 pts)
|
The images/text chosen were appropriate and extremely thoughtful to the topic and conveyed in an excellent manner the Pecha Kuchua's purpose. The audience was informed and entertained. |
The images/text chosen were appropriate and considered the topic in a thoughtful way. The presenter has used good quality visual images and has used a creative or interesting visual design for the presentation.
|
The presenter has used adequate quality visual images, but does not use a creative or interesting visual design for the presentation. The images/text chosen distracted from the presentation. |
Visual images are poorly chosen, OR the quality of the images is not legible, OR used a particularly garish or distracting visual design for the presentation.
|
|
Prep & Presentation of script (30 pts) |
The presenter obviously prepared a compelling |
The presenter obviously prepared a script, rehearsed, |
It appears the presenter prepared a mediocre script |
It appears that the presenter did not prepare a script or did not |
NOTE: These presentations will be narrated PowerPoints that will be posted in the Dropbox. Do not use PDFs, Google Docs, etc.