Design and Planning of PHCs
|
PROPOSAL EVALUATION & CHECKLIST FORM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY |
||||
|
|
Yes |
No |
1 to 5 |
Comments |
|
Overall, the summary clearly and concisely summarizes the request |
|
|
|
|
|
Identifies the grant application |
|
|
|
|
|
Includes at least one sentence on credibility and previous work |
|
|
|
|
|
Includes at least one sentence on problem |
|
|
|
|
|
Includes at least one sentence on objectives |
|
|
|
|
|
Includes at least one sentence on methods |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal interventions are listed |
|
|
|
|
|
Target population is identified |
|
|
|
|
|
Time frame is specified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
||||
|
|
Yes |
No |
1 to 5 |
Comments |
|
Overall, the introduction describes the applicant agency and its qualifications for funding (credibility) |
|
|
|
|
|
Clearly established who is applying for funds |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes applicant agency purposes, goals, and philosophy |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes applicant's program and activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes applicant's target populations |
|
|
|
|
|
Provides evidence of accomplishments and previous sources of funds |
|
|
|
|
|
Offers statistical support of accomplishments |
|
|
|
|
|
Documents contributions made by previous activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Supports qualifications in area of activity which funds are sough (e.g. child survival, food relief) |
|
|
|
|
|
Leads logically to the problem statement |
|
|
|
|
|
Is as brief as possible |
|
|
|
|
|
Is interesting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. PROBLEM STATEMENT OR NEEDS ASSESSMENT |
||||
|
|
Yes |
No |
1 to 5 |
Comments |
|
Overall, the problem statement clearly reflects assessment of the needs on which the proposal is based |
|
|
|
|
|
Relates to purposes and goals of applicant agency and indicates how the agency came about the information leading to this proposal |
|
|
|
|
|
Of reasonable size (not attempting to solve all problems) |
|
|
|
|
|
Supported by statistical evidence |
|
|
|
|
|
Supported by statements from the Ministry of Health |
|
|
|
|
|
Target group clearly delineated |
|
|
|
|
|
Stated in terms of target group needs and problems (not needs of the applicant) |
|
|
|
|
|
Developed with input from local consultants in the host country |
|
|
|
|
|
Contains adequate background material on host country and effectiveness of proposed interventions |
|
|
|
|
|
Makes no unsupported interventions |
|
|
|
|
|
Does not duplicate existing programs |
|
|
|
|
|
Is as brief as possible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. PROGRAM OBJECTIVES |
||||
|
|
Yes |
No |
1 to 5 |
Comments |
|
Overall, program objectives describe the outcomes of the proposed project in measurable terms |
|
|
|
|
|
At least one objective for each problem or need committed to the problem statement |
|
|
|
|
|
Objectives are measurable |
|
|
|
|
|
Objectives are realistic |
|
|
|
|
|
Objectives are not methods or goals |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes the population that will benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
States the time by which objectives will be accomplished |
|
|
|
|
|
Appropriate indicators are present for each objective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV. METHODS |
||||
|
|
Yes |
No |
1 to 5 |
Comments |
|
Overall, the section clearly describes the activities to be conducted in order to achieve the desired objectives |
|
|
|
|
|
Flows naturally from problems and objectives |
|
|
|
|
|
Clearly describes activities and how they will be carried out |
|
|
|
|
|
States reasons for the selection of methods |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes the work plan for the life of project or provides timeline |
|
|
|
|
|
Described staffing of the program |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes qualifications of staff so as to conduct specialized activities, such as training, financial management, and data analysis, in an adequate manner |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes an appropriate supervision system for staff and volunteers |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes training program in adequate detail |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes target group selection for interventions |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes how the community will participate in all phases of the program |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes cooperation with the Ministry of Health and other organizations working in proposed location |
|
|
|
|
|
Presents a reasonable scope of activities that can be conducted within the time line and resources of the program and the community |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. MONITORING AND EVALUATION (M&E) |
||||
|
|
Yes |
No |
1 to 5 |
Comments |
|
Overall, the section clearly presents a plan for determining the degree to which objectives are met and methods are followed |
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring component is clearly described |
|
|
|
|
|
Flow of information within the project is described |
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel responsible for analysis of information are identified |
|
|
|
|
|
Use of information to improve project methods is described |
|
|
|
|
|
Nature and frequency of reports to be generated are described |
|
|
|
|
|
Annual, mid-term and final evaluations are provided for |
|
|
|
|
|
Presents a plan and modifying methods over the course of the program based on evaluations |
|
|
|
|
|
Contains budgetary provision for monitoring and evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
Tells who will be doing the evaluation and how they were chosen |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes what information will be collected at annual, mid-term, and final evaluations |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes final report to be generated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VI. SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGY |
||||
|
|
Yes |
No |
1 to 5 |
Comments |
|
Overall, section clearly describes a plan for sustaining some or all activities beyond the life of the project |
|
|
|
|
|
Presents a specific plan to obtain future funding if program is to be continued |
|
|
|
|
|
Presents a plan for evaluating and modifying methods over the course of the program so interventions may continuous beyond the life of the project |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes how other funds will be obtained, if necessary to continue the project if not handled over to another agency or Ministry of Health |
|
|
|
|
|
If project is not sustainable without further assistance, is the initial undertaking even justified? |
|
|
|
|
|
Is accompanied by letters of commitment, if project is to be assumed by another agency or the Ministry of Health? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VII. Budget |
||||
|
|
Yes |
No |
1 to 5 |
Comments |
|
Overall, section clearly delineates cost in a realistic manner and shows evidence of serious thought |
|
|
|
|
|
Tells the same story as the proposal narrative |
|
|
|
|
|
Is accompanied by a n narrative summary, which is consistent |
|
|
|
|
|
Budget expenditures match the work plan |
|
|
|
|
|
Detailed in all aspects |
|
|
|
|
|
Clearly shows which costs are to be met by the donor and what "matching funds" are provided by the agency |
|
|
|
|
|
Contains no unexplained amounts for miscellaneous or contingency |
|
|
|
|
|
Includes all items asked of the donor |
|
|
|
|
|
Includes all items paid for by other sources |
|
|
|
|
|
Includes value of in-kind items |
|
|
|
|
|
Details fringe benefits, separate from salaries |
|
|
|
|
|
Separates travel costs, if required of donor |
|
|
|
|
|
Includes all consultants |
|
|
|
|
|
Separately details all non-personnel costs |
|
|
|
|
|
Includes indicates costs where appropriate |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes provisions for an audit |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes what will happen with assets at end of project |
|
|
|
|
|
Sufficient to perform tasks described in the narrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OVERALL COMMENTS |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|