Workshop 13
Pay for Performance Analysis
Pay-for-Performance Philosophy: objective standards and results, fair distribution - extra effort equates to extra reward
Incentive Plans:
· Allow organizations to reward employees for continued contributions: additional projects, programs, developmental tasks
· Goes above job description (base position)
· Focus: results
· Variable pay: ties pay to some measure of individual, group, or organizational performance (bonuses, incentives, recognition for good work, rewards for continued contributions
· Measurement: clear standards and metrics, fair and unbiased assessment of performance
|
Information: YOUR pay-for-performance plan for your 12 employees Metrics established Standards established: 5=Excellent, 4= Outstanding, 3=Meets Standards, 2=Needs Improvement, 1=Poor Current annual salary ranges and employee midpoint Competition’s (market) salary ranges Merit pool: $10,374
|
|
Instructions: Read and reflect on “pay-for-performance” concepts and data provided above. |
|
1. How many employees are eligible for the merit pool?
|
|
2. How did you determine eligibility?
|
|
3. Who will receive the largest proportion (percentage) of the merit pool?
|
|
4. Feedback to your employees: what will you focus on?
|
Employee #Employee NameAnnual $Total AppraisalKnowledgeInitiativeTeamworkQualityQuantityCustomer Svc
12James, Brian25,480.00$ 3.8343.5444
11Sotomayor, Sara26,000.00$ 3.43.534433
10Harris, Kevin27,560.00$ 2.7323323
9Johnson, Evelyn27,040.00$ 2.8332333
8Nguyen, Cara28,080.00$ 3.543.543.533
7Smith, Will28,600.00$ 3.2433333
6Ahmed, Farrokh29,120.00$ 3.8343445
5Whitmer, Gretchen29,640.00$ 4.254.5443.54
4Li, Jiao30,160.00$ 3.3443333
3Perez, Santiago30,680.00$ 2.7332233
2Fischer, Stephan 31,200.00$ 3.23.533.5333
1Nakamura, Aimi32,240.00$ 3.0333333
Standards5 = ExcellentEmployee Midpoint31,000.00$
4 = OutstandingMarket range $ 27,200 - 34,900
3 = Meets StandardsMerit pool10,374.00$
2 = Needs ImprovementParticipation rate9/12 = 75%
1 = Poor