Assignment 2: RA 1: Assessment
Running head: PART TWO-CLIENT STATEMENT 1
PART TWO-CLIENT STATEMENT 2
Part Two-Client Statement
Stephanie Rincon
Professor: Erica Wansel
Interviewing & Interrogation: History & Techniques
February 6, 2019
Part Two-Client Statement
When it comes to identifying the risks assessment questionnaire, it is essential to use the Offenders Assessment System (OASys). The design of the risk assessment questionnaire is that it allows the assessment of Bob’s past, present, and future likelihood of committing crimes.
References
Aknin, L., Barrington-Leigh, C., Dunn, E., Helliwell, J., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., & Norton, M. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 104(4),, 635.
Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Eisenberg, N., & Laguna, M. (2015). On the factor structure of the Rosenberg (1965) General Self-Esteem Scale. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 621.
Andrews, D., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 7-27.
Howard, P., Francis, B., Soothill, K., & Humphreys, L. (2009). OGRS 3: The revised offender group reconviction scale.
Jackson, R., & Hess, D. (2007). Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(4), 425-448.
Magidson, J., Roberts, B., Collado-Rodriguez, A., & Lejuez, C. (2014). Theory-driven intervention for changing personality: Expectancy value theory, behavioral activation, and conscientiousness. Developmental psychology, 50(5),, 1442.
McCleskey, J. (2013). The dark side of leadership: Measurement, assessment, and intervention. Business Renaissance Quarterly, 8(2/3),, 35.
Olver, M., Wong, S., Nicholaichuk, T., & Gordon, A. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological assessment, 19(3), 318.