Part I & II Audience and Topic for Educational Webinar
Part II: Educational Webinar Assignment (This assignment can be used for your EWP) FCS 3800 Family Life Sex Education – Dr. Sherwood
Webinars are an efficient, inexpensive, and popular way of communicating information when participants cannot be in the same geographical location at the same time. Webinars are synchronous, allowing for engagement in discussions among participants, or asynchronous, allowing participants to access content individually as their time allows. A webinar is not a standard presentation. For instance, webinars have very little text, but rely on media (e.g., presenter’s narration and interaction with participants, video clips, photos, graphs and charts) to transmit information. There are specific and accepted methods you can use to develop a webinar that is engaging and effective, please look at the resources within the module related to the assignment. Part II: Outline/Paper – 50pts
I. Audience for your Webinar (1st heading – 100 words)
a. Demographics
b. Usefulness of content
c. Specific characteristics
II. Intended Focus (2nd heading – 200-400 words)
a. Focus
b. Summary of contents
III. Research into Webinar Topic (3rd heading – 300-500 words)
a. Overview
b. Timeline
c. Demographics
IV. Implementation (4th heading – 200-400 words)
a. Mechanics (e.g., ppt, prezi)
b. Media (requires narration and complementary media)
i. Photos/graphics
ii. Video
V. Reference List - Identify relevant research using five academic sources
a. You can supplement your sources with no more than one popular press source
b. Dated 2010 or later
c. Use APA for citations and include a formal reference list
d. Governmental data (e.g., center for disease control, census data) can be used as no more one of your academic sources
e. Use the research to shape every aspect of the assignment (i.e., identification of audience and material relevant to that audience,
development of webinar)
Technical Aspects of the Assignment: Assignments should be typed using 12 point font, papers should be double spaced with a one inch margin. APA should be used when referencing source material. I strongly recommend you look over the APA source material; a lack of comment on incorrect APA usage in another course (e.g. your last professor did not tell you that your APA was incorrect) is not always indicative of proper formatting. Technical writing (i.e. grammar, punctuation, spelling) is important and will be part of the final grade for the assignment. Your paper and graphic (infographic, meme, work cloud, concept mapping) must be completed and submitted by midnight on the date due. Submissions occur through dropboxes on d2l. Late assignments are accepted with an immediate loss of 10% (one letter grade) and an addition 10% each week until submission. Eastern Illinois University is committed to the learning process and academic integrity that is defined in the Students Conduct Code (1.1). To encourage original and authentic written work, any written assignment created in this course will be submitted for review to Turnitin on d2l and will become a searchable document with the Turnitin-protected and restricted database. Assignments should not show more than 15% material obtained from another source (excluding references and direct quotes) as per Turnitin’s originality reports. The use of originality reports are strongly recommended and are explained within the FAQ’s under “Communication” on d2l. Assignments should not show more than 25% material obtained from another source when direct quotes are considered. Assignments over 15% originality (25% when considering direct quotes) will be graded based on original material. For example – if an assignment worth 100 points contains 40% source material 40% (40 points) will automatically be lost. Loss of points will not occur for 15% or 25%.
Assignment construction – 10 percent 10% 0%
*required length; neither too brief or too long *template (i.e., example) used *includes four headings and a reference list
*double-spaced
*12pt font *submitted per dropbox
*one-inch margins
Points will not be awarded if all four basic requirements are not met
Coherent writing of prepared materials: sentence structure, organization, punctuation, grammar – 30 percent
30% 24% 18% 12% 0-12%
*sentences clear and concise
*paragraphs flow and build on one another, well organized
*not more than 1 structure, punctuation, spelling error for each 2 paragraphs
*sentences mostly clear and concise
*paragraphs support one another
*not more than 2 structure, punctuation, spelling error for each 2 paragraphs
*sentences often ramble or are clumsily constructed
*paragraphs disjointed
*not more than 3 structure, punctuation, spelling error for each 2 paragraphs
*sentences tend to ramble or are clumsily constructed
*paragraphs disjointed and unrelated to one another
*not more than 4 structure, punctuation, spelling error for each 2 paragraphs
*sentences generally unclear
*paragraphs disjointed and unrelated to one another
*5 or more structure, punctuation, spelling error for each 2 paragraphs
Use of APA - 10 percent
10% 7% 5% 0%
*cited in narrative appropriate and not redundant
*full source cited *indentation correct
*sources cited in narrative, yet incorrect or redundant
*sources cited incorrectly
*sources not cited in narrative
*source not cited
*more than 3 errors in style
*reference list missing *APA style not used
Use of Appropriate Material and Depth of Understanding/Analysis of Topic – 50 percent
50% 30% 25% 15% 0%
*source content appropriate for unique characteristics of the audience
*terminology consistent with course materials
*critique (analysis) of topic shows thought and understanding of source material in light of course information
*lack of any form of bias or judgment, speculation, or opinion
*source content generally appropriate for audience
*terminology consistent with course materials *critique of topic not fully formed, missing information
*lack of any form of bias or judgment, speculation, or opinion
*source content of questionable use to audience
*terminology somewhat consistent with course materials
*critique of topic unclear *lack of any form of bias or judgment, speculation, or opinion
*source material not appropriate for audience
*terminology rarely academic or consistent with course materials most statements related to opinion instead of academic research
*slightly biased in nature, speculative, or relying on opinion
*source material inappropriate (not academic, dated before 2010, not related to course content)
*terminology related to course is not in evidence
*critique not included
*biased in nature