Week 6 Discussion Question 1 & Discussion Question 2

profileceteiv
ParticipationRubric_QualityRubric7.02.xlsx
Home>Business & Finance homework help>Accounting homework help>Week 6 Discussion Question 1 & Discussion Question 2

Rubric

QUALITY RUBRIC FOR PARTICIPATION
Class participation is required at 8 posts per week over 3 days. There should be 2 Discussion Questions responses (graded separately) and 6 follow up and collaborative posts. These may be posted anywhere available for discussion in the classroom. These are in general expected to be similar to first responses to discusssion questions but may include ideas, experience, and informed content and examples. All posts will be published without plagiarism and with careful attention to mandatory citation formats.
SUPERIOR SATISFACTORY INFERIOR
Discussion Question (paired to content in Connect) response standards and graded separately
Academic Rigor Full credit Possible credit Most likely no credit
Length of response ~ 500 words 350-500 words <350 words
Content Relating to course readings Somewhat related Unrelated
Source of content Our texts cited and referenced (required) Authoritative sites Other
Informed expert support 1. government sources 1. Newspapers (chron.com)
Bona fide source financial statements 2. WSJ, Forbes, Economist Journalism, journalists
AICPA sourced CPC 3. Professional Journals 2. any .com (unless the author increase zoom to 110%
(peer reviewed, refereed) is in the field, has good credentials,
4. Experience believed to be and article is peer reviewed)
documentable 3. any .pedia or dictionary
5. Other current and related 4. Personal opinion not
textbooks, accessible to others based on a body of knowledge
(Above OK for 2nd responses and nor related to course content.
Method of presentation continuing dialog responses)
Mechanics Presentation is formatted Post has some errors in graphics, Does not meet Superior or
correctly and easy to read. sentencing, or other distractions Satisfactory standards.
Writing No errors in grammar, spelling, Minor errors that do not distract Substantial writing errors
punctuation, and accuracy or impede understanding (e.g., non capitalization of proper
nours or titles, letters missing)
Presentation Expository (topic identified) Not well defined. Does not meet Superior or
argument developed around Majority is a quote Satisfactory standards
content and specifics; examples Use of third person Disregard of writing standards
Academic skills Analysis, critical thinking Repetition of others' findings Lack of academic skills in
Use of course and established metrics Uncertain reference to numbers presenting answer
Citation Correct according to APA 6th Incorrect APA citation. Plagiarism.
Published words in quotes with Substantive content needing Missing.
in-text citation. Reference at end. citation corrections. Substantially incorrect or vague
Clarity of what is being cited Footnoting (APA) when not needed MLA or other forms of citation
Follow up and collaborative responses to other students, videos, supplemental resources, or instructor.
Academic Rigor Sustains May meet standards Does not meet standards
Academics and arguments 150 word minimum, on topic. 100-150 words. Does not meet the criteria
Extends the related conversation. Personal opinion. for Superior or Satisfactory.
Uses informed opinion. Somewhat content topic related.
Academic sourced content. Does not appear to be fiction.
Related experience that could be Examples and extension of dialogue
(does not need be) documented. from less academic oriented sites.