nursing clinical reasoning errors

Criterion

High Distinction (HD)

Provides a contextualised overview of the clinical encounter that clearly highlights the points where the nominated clinical reasoning errors occur. 20%

clearly and correctly identified two clinical reasoning errors with robust justification for their application to your clinical encounter.

You have demonstrated exceptional understanding of clinical reasoning errors.

Demonstrates an understanding of relevant clinical reasoning errors associated with the clinical encounter and its impact on patient outcomes. 30%

Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of relevant clinical reasoning errors through clear succinct definitions, exploration and alignment to clinical encounter that highlights impact/s on patient outcomes.

Demonstrates the ability to reflect on own professional practice to inform future nursing practice as a beginning level practitioner 30%

Demonstrates capacity in critical reflection through sound reasoning and inquiry.

Critical reflection has directly, clearly and logically informed requirements for future practice.

Uses appropriate scholarly literature to substantiate findings throughout. Uses Harvard referencing style 10%

Accurately references all sources using the Harvard style. Outstanding use of appropriate academic literature that substantiates thinking and arguments that considers evidence-based practice relevant to the encounter.

Writes in a clear and concise academic style that is succinct, logical and coherent. 10%

Communicates with a highly evolved academic writing style with strong evidence of planning.

The paper is exceptionally logical, insightful and balanced and is consistently expressed in a clear and fluent manner with minimal or no spelling/grammar errors.