project part 3 due in 4 days

This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.

Criteria

Equivalent to an A

Equivalent to a B

Equivalent to a C

Equivalent to a D

Equivalent to an F

Criterion Score

Introduction (3%)

3 points

Writes an introduction that captures the reader's attention, gives context to the paper, and builds to the thesis (in the last sentence of the introduction) that defines all of the main points to be discussed in the paper.

(2.7 - 3)

2.55 points

Writes an introduction that provides a general context to the paper, has a thesis statement and somewhat discusses main topics but is vague or does not cover all main topics.

(2.4 - 2.6)

2.25 points

Writes an introduction that provides context to the paper and presents main topics covered in the paper but this information is not presented in a thesis statement but throughout the first paragraph.

(2.1 - 2.3)

1.95 points

Attempts to write an introduction but has little to no context to the paper; the thesis is missing main points or no thesis statement provided.

(1.8 - 2.0)

0 points

No attempt to write an introduction.

(0)

Score of Introduction (3%),3 / 3

Criterion Feedback

Good, except you should include the name of the chosen candidate and briefly list why in the thesis.

Identify and discuss the management skills that each candidate possesses. (14%)

14 points

Thoroughly and correctly identifies and discusses the management skills that each candidate possesses using course materials to make connections with the case scenario facts.

(12.6 - 14)

11.9 points

Correctly Identifies and discusses the management skills that each candidate possesses using course materials to make connections with the case scenario facts but needs some development.

(11.2 - 12.5)

10.5 points

Identifies and discusses the management skills that each candidate possesses using course materials to make connections with the case scenario facts but needs significant development.

(9.8 - 11.1)

9.1 points

Attempts to identify or discuss the management skills that each candidate possesses using little to no course materials to make connections with the case scenario facts; may not use case scenario facts; may not discuss each candidate or partially discusses or makes incorrect choices; needs major development.

(8.4 - 9.7)

0 points

Little to no attempt to identify or discuss the management skills that each candidate possesses.

(0 - 8.3)

Score of Identify and discuss the management skills that each candidate possesses. (14%),14 / 14

Criterion Feedback

You make very thorough connections from the course readings to the case study.

Identify and discuss the leadership skills that each candidate possesses. (14%)

14 points

Thoroughly and correctly identifies and discusses the leadership skills that each candidate possesses using course materials to make connections with the case scenario facts.

(12.6 - 14)

11.9 points

Correctly identifies and discusses the leadership skills that each candidate possesses using course materials to make connections with the case scenario facts; some development needed.

(11.2 - 12.5)

10.5 points

Identifies and discusses the leadership skills that each candidate possesses using course materials to make connections with the case scenario facts; significant development needed.

(9.8 - 11.1)

9.1 points

Attempts to identify or discuss the leadership skills that each candidate possesses using little to no course materials to make connections with the case scenario facts; may not use case scenario facts; may not discuss each candidate or partially discusses or made incorrect choices; needs major development.

(8.4 - 9.7)

0 points

Little to no attempt to identify or discuss the leadership skills that each candidate possesses.

(0 - 8.3)

Score of Identify and discuss the leadership skills that each candidate possesses. (14%),9.1 / 14

Criterion Feedback

An excessive amount of detail here, but no support from the course readings.

Identify and discuss the leadership style of each candidate. (14%)

14 points

Thoroughly and correctly identifies and discusses the leadership style that each candidate possesses using course materials to make connections with the case scenario facts.

(12.6 - 14)

11.9 points

Correctly identifies and discusses the leadership style that each candidate possesses using course materials to make connections with the case scenario facts; some development needed.

(11.2 - 12.5)

10.5 points

Identifies and discusses the leadership style that each candidate possesses using course materials to make connections with the case scenario facts; significant development needed.

(9.8 - 11.1)

9.1 points

Attempts to identify or discuss the leadership style that each candidate possesses using little to no course materials to make connections with the case scenario facts; may not use case scenario facts; may not discuss each candidate or partially discusses or made incorrect choices; needs major development.

(8.4 - 9.7)

0 points

Little to no attempt to identify or discuss the leadership style that each candidate possesses.

(0 - 8.3)

Score of Identify and discuss the leadership style of each candidate. (14%),9.1 / 14

Criterion Feedback

No incorporation of course material

Recommend the best candidate and explains why this candidate is the best choice. (13%)

13 points

Recommends the best candidate and explains why this candidate is the best choice using the case scenario facts and the course materials to support reasoning.

(11.7 - 13)

11.05 points

Recommends a candidate and explains why this candidate is the best choice using case scenario facts and course materials to support reasoning but needs some development.

(10.4 - 11.6)

9.75 points

Recommends a candidate and explains why this candidate is the best choice using case scenario facts and course materials to support reasoning but needs significant development.

(9.1 - 10.3)

8.45 points

Recommends a candidate; fails to use case scenario facts to explain why; uses minimal or no course materials to support reasoning; major development needed.

(7.8 - 9)

0 points

Little to no attempt to recommend a candidate or explanation why this candidate is the best choice was missing.

(0 - 7.7)

Score of Recommend the best candidate and explains why this candidate is the best choice. (13%),8.45 / 13

Criterion Feedback

Recommendation should be based off of both course material and case study facts.

Explain why the other two candidates were not selected. (14%)

14 points

Thoroughly and correctly explains why the other two candidates were not selected using course materials to make connections with the case scenario facts.

(12.6 - 14)

11.9 points

Correctly explains why the other two candidates were not selected using course materials to make connections with the case scenario facts; some development needed.

(11.2 - 12.5)

10.5 points

Explains why the other two candidates were not selected using course materials to make connections with the case scenario facts; significant development needed.

(9.8 - 11.1)

9.1 points

Attempts to explain why the other two candidates were not selected using little to no course materials to make connections with the case scenario facts; may not use case scenario facts; may not discuss each candidate or partially discusses or made incorrect choices; needs major development.

(8.4 - 9.7)

0 points

Little to no attempt to explain why the other two candidates were not selected .

(0 - 8.3)

Score of Explain why the other two candidates were not selected. (14%),9.1 / 14

Criterion Feedback

No course support, and not very detailed

Conclusion (3%)

3 points

In a clear and concise manner, comprehensively concludes the paper by restating/ summarizing the main findings covered in the paper and reflects on the importance of the arguments made.

(2.7 - 3)

2.55 points

In a clear manner concludes the paper by restating/ summarizing the main findings; some development is needed.

(2.4 - 2.6)

2.25 points

Concludes the paper by somewhat restating/ summarizing the argument. Attempts to bring in some explanation or general idea of the main findings of the paper but needs significant development.

(2.1 - 2.3)

1.95 points

Presents a conclusion but may be irrelevant to the main findings of the paper OR does not discuss the main topics of the paper.

(1.8 - 2)

0 points

Fails to present restatement/ summarization of argument.

(0 - 1.7)

Score of Conclusion (3%),2.25 / 3

Criterion Feedback

Very general; nowhere is the candidate mentioned. This is the entire purpose of the project and should serve as a re-statement somewhere.

Attention to Instructions (10%)

10 points

The paper contains all major assignment tasks. The paper also includes completion of all required elements (Word or rtf file, third person writing, paraphrasing, no more than four consecutive words from source, no contractions, page/paragraph numbers/Chapter Titles).

(9 - 10)

8.5 points

The paper contains all major assignment tasks. The paper missed one minor element (Word or rtf file, third person writing, paraphrasing, no more than four consecutive words from source, no contractions, page/paragraph/numbers/Chapter Titles). (8 - 8.9)

7.5 points

One major assignment tasks or two minor elements of the assignment missed. .

(7 - 7.9)

6.5 points

Two major assignment tasks missed or 3 minor aspects of the assignments.

(6 - 6.9)

0 points

Three or more major assignment tasks missed OR four or more minor elements missed.

(0 - 5.9)

Score of Attention to Instructions (10%),6.5 / 10

Criterion Feedback

Outside sources not allowed, page paragraph numbers missing from in-text citations

Writing Mechanics (10%)

10 points

Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English using paragraphs and sentence rather than bullets, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic errors, spelling and grammatical errors. No jargon used. Few writing errors noted.

(9 - 10)

8.5 points

Excellently adheres to standard usage of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. One - three errors noted.

(8 - 8.9)

7.5 points

Satisfactorily adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Four to seven errors noted.

(7 - 7.9)

6.5 points

Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. More than 7 errors found.

(6 - 6.9)

0 points

Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English largely incomprehensible, or errors are too plentiful to count.

(0 - 5.9)

Score of Writing Mechanics (10%),7.5 / 10

Criterion Feedback

Grammar issues, including a really long run-on sentence at the bottom of page two.

APA Style (7th ed.) (5%)

5 points

Excellent use of APA style, few usage errors; Proper citation of source material is used throughout paper; Reference titles follow APA with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized.

(4.5 - 5)

4.25 points

Uses in-text citations and reference list but 1 - 2 APA style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 1-2 times.

(4 - 4.4)

3.75 points

Uses in-text citations and reference lists; but 3 - 4 APA style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 3 - 4 times.

(3.5 - 3.9)

3.25 points

Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; but 5 - 6 times style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 5-6 times. Seldom uses APA.

(3 - 3.4)

0 points

No attempt at APA style; or attempts either in-text citations or reference list but omits the other.

(0 – 2.99)

Score of APA Style (7th ed.) (5%),3.75 / 5