Law - Criminal Assignment # 3

Criteria Ratings Points

Content 20 to >17 pts

Advanced

Within the context of the conflict resolution: the student is able to frame their intervention plan within the theoretical conceptualization noted in previous assignments. Additionally, the introduction of the paper sets up the critical elements of the paper.

17 to >16 pts

Proficient

Within the context of the conflict resolution: the student is able to frame their intervention plan within the theoretical conceptualization noted in previous assignments. The introduction of the paper is somewhat vague with respect to the critical elements of the paper.

16 to >0 pts

Developing

Within the context of the conflict resolution: the student lacked specific frames of reference to the theoretical conceptualization of the issue. The introduction does not introduce the paper – it merely starts one section of the elements of the paper

0 pts

Not Present

20 pts

Content 20 to >17 pts

Advanced

Within the context of the conflict resolution: the author clearly analyzes how the chosen intervention may cause change in the conflict dynamic and the impending impact on the parties of the conflict. Complex issues are navigated with precision.

17 to >16 pts

Proficient

Within the context of the conflict resolution: the author outlines how the chosen intervention may cause change in the conflict dynamic and outlines a few dynamics of the impending impact on the parties of the conflict. Complex issues are handled but with a less nuanced approach and appreciation for all parties of the conflict.

16 to >0 pts

Developing

Within the context of the conflict resolution: the author vaguely outlines how the chosen intervention may cause change in the conflict dynamic and vaguely outlines a few dynamics of the impending impact on the parties of the conflict. Complex issues are avoided.

0 pts

Not Present

20 pts

Content 20 to >17 pts

Advanced

Within the context of conflict resolution: the author successfully argues the need for criminal justice conflict resolution intervention in this situation. Clearly articulates why conflict resolution techniques are better than other methods.

17 to >16 pts

Proficient

Within the context of conflict resolution: the author generally argues the need for criminal justice conflict resolution intervention in this situation. Generally, articulates why conflict resolution techniques are better than other methods.

16 to >0 pts

Developing

• Within the context of conflict resolution: the author is less than convincing that criminal justice conflict resolution intervention is needed in this situation. The author’s articulation is not clear why conflict resolution techniques are better than other methods.

0 pts

Not Present

20 pts

Conflict Resolution: Part 3 – Action Plan Grading Rubric | CJUS830_B02_202340

Criteria Ratings Points

Content 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

Creates a Christian Worldview (CWV) Section and applies CWV elements and support in the conflict resolution action plan. Specific biblical references (book, chapter, and verse) should be used.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

Creates Christian Worldview (CWV) Section and applies general CWV elements and support in explanation of the conflict resolution action plan with global referencing to biblical references (reference does not have a book, chapter, and verse, rather, “the Bible says type of references).

7 to >0 pts

Developing

Christian Worldview (CWV) mentioned. No specific section in the paper. Only general CWV elements and support in explanation of the conflict resolution action plan with global referencing to biblical references (reference does not have a book, chapter, and verse, rather, “the Bible says type of references).

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Structure 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

• No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate. • Student has proper page count. Six to Eight pages (or more if page count waived by instructor) not including title page, abstract, or reference section.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

• Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is adequate. • Student has 70% of the proper page count of Six pages not including title page, abstract, or reference section.

7 to >0 pts

Developing

• Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good. • Student has less than 70% of the proper page count of Six pages, not including title page, abstract, or reference section.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Structure 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

• Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page, abstract, main body, and reference section are correctly formatted. Paper is double spaced with 1inch margins and written in 12-point Times New Roman font.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

• Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors Cover page, abstract, main body, and reference section are present with few errors. Paper is double spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12-point Times New Roman font.

7 to >0 pts

Developing

• Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page, abstract, main body, and reference section are included though several errors are present. Paper is double spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Conflict Resolution: Part 3 – Action Plan Grading Rubric | CJUS830_B02_202340

Criteria Ratings Points

Structure 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

Academic primary and .gov (when necessary) are used well and include a minimum of 4 citations and the Holy Bible as listed below. Research may incorporate multiple viewpoints of complex issues. A complete and accurate reference section is provided. Arguments are correctly supported with research.

Standard: • A minimum of 4 citations (past 10-years unless waived by the professor), relevant, academic (peer-reviewed) journals preferred. Must use at least one Holy Bible citation. Students may use additional sources to support their claims and may use non to academic sources as long as the minimum requirements above are met. Grade the best 4 citations.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

Research is aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. Academic primary and .gov (when necessary) are used well and include a minimum of 70% of the required 4 citations as listed below. Research is aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. A complete and accurate reference section is provided. Arguments are correctly supported with research.

Standard: • A minimum of 4 citations (past 10-years unless waived by the professor), relevant, academic (peer-reviewed) journals preferred. Must use at least one Holy Bible citation. Students may use additional sources to support their claims and may use non to academic sources as long as the minimum requirements above are met. Grade the best 4 citations.

7 to >0 pts

Developing

Less than 70% of the Academic sources required (4) citations, as listed below, are used. Reliance on popular sources is evident. Arguments incorporate limited research but often include personal opinions without appropriate support. Sources are, at times, not used appropriately. Research is not aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. An incomplete or inaccurate reference section is provided.

Standard: A minimum of 4 citations (past 10-years unless waived by the professor), relevant, academic (peer-reviewed) journals preferred. Must use at least one Holy Bible citation. Students may use additional sources to support their claims and may use non to academic sources as long as the minimum requirements above are met. Grade the best 4 citations.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Conflict Resolution: Part 3 – Action Plan Grading Rubric | CJUS830_B02_202340