Parenting Action Plan

ParentingActionPlan.odt

Home >Biology homework help >Parenting Action Plan

Your Parenting Action Plan should be about 2000-3000 word in length and follow APA style (7th edition). Be sure to use in-text citations and include a reference list.

Copy and paste your case study at the beginning of your document to provide the context for your research essay. (This will not count towards your word total.)

Your essay should be written in your own words and you should always cite any ideas that come from another source. Do not use quotations or copy verbatim from another author.

Your action plan can build on your existing research essay, but the action plan itself will include a few additional components (denoted with an * below). The research you have done should be carefully woven into your action plan. In other words, don’t just copy and paste your research essay and tack on more words. Use the research to justify the actions you are proposing.

Statement of the problem: A statement of the key issues that must be explored in order to resolve your case study.(This can be the same as the statement in your research essay)
Incorporation of at least 10 credible sources from within the past 10 years that can be used to support a parenting action plan. At least 5 of these sources must be scholarly social science research articles, and at least 3 of the sources must have been published within the last 2 years.
*Incorporation of parenting or developmental theories to provide a framework for the proposed action plan.
*Description of potential sites of impact (Step 6 of the Planning Table).
*Identify an action plan grounded in research that may address concerns posed by the case study (Step 7 of the Planning Table).
Correct use of in-text citations and corresponding reference list (APA 7th edition).
Use of APA 7th edition format (1” margins, standard font, double spacing, page numbers, etc.).
Demonstration of strong writing skills.

Your Parenting Action Plan will be evaluated according to the following rubric:

Criteria

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Missing or Not Acceptable

Includes Copy of Case Study

Case study (AFP Part 1) is copied and pasted at the beginning of the document.

(5 points)

Case study (AFP Part 1) is not copied and pasted at the beginning of the document.

(0 points)

Statement of the Problem

Concise and well-written statement identifies the key issues that must be explored in order to resolve your case study.

(5 points)

Well-written statement identifies most of the key issues that must be explored in order to resolve your case study.

(4 points)

Clear statement identifies some of the key issues that must be explored in order to resolve your case study.

(3 points)

Many of the key issues that must be explored in order to resolve your case study are missing or incorrect.

(2 points)

Missing a statement about any key issues that must be explored in order to resolve your case study.

(0 points)

Use of Scholarly Sources

Effectively incorporates at least 5 scholarly sources.

(5 points)

Effectively incorporates at least 4 scholarly sources.

(4 points)

Effectively incorporates at least 3 scholarly sources.

(3 points)

Effectively incorporates at least 2 scholarly sources.

(2 points)

Incorporates fewer than 2 scholarly sources.

(0 points)

Use of Credible Sources

Effectively incorporates at least 10 credible sources published within the past 10 years.

At least three sources were published within the past 2 years.

(5 points)

Effectively incorporates 8 or 9 credible sources published within the past 10 years.

At least three sources were published within the past 2 years.

(4 points)

Effectively incorporates least 6 or 7 credible sources published within the past 10 years.

At least three sources were published within the past 2 years.

(3 points)

Effectively incorporates 4 or 5 credible sources published within the past 10 years.

Fewer than three sources were published within the past 2 years.

(2 points)

Incorporates fewer than 4 credible sources are used.

Does not use sources within the past 2 years.

(0 points)

Summary of Research

Excellent summary and integration of research that effectively supports possible resolutions to the case study.

(10 points)

Good summary and integration of research that supports possible resolutions to the case study. Missing 1 or 2 minor points.

(8 points)

Fair summary and integration of research that supports possible resolutions to the case study. Missing 1 or 2 important points.

(6 points)

Poor summary and integration of research that do not support possible resolutions to the case study. Missing many important points.

(4 points)

No relevant summary of the research.

(0 points)

Incorporation of parenting or developmental theories to provide a framework for the proposed action plan.

Excellent incorporation of at least 2 parenting or developmental theories that provide a framework for explaining why the proposed action plan should be effective.

(10 points)

Good incorporation of 1 or 2 parenting or developmental theories that provide a framework for explaining why the proposed action plan should be effective. Minor details may be missing.

(8 points)

Fair incorporation of at least 1 or 2 parenting or developmental theories that provide a framework for explaining why the proposed action plan should be effective. Major details may be missing.

(6 points)

Poor incorporation parenting or developmental theory. Major details may be missing.

(4 points)

No attempt to incorporate parenting or developmental theory.

(0 points)

Description of potential sites of impact (Step 6 of the Planning Table).

Excellent description of the potential sites of impact as they relate to the case study.

(10 points)

Good description of the potential sites of impact as they relate to the case study. One or two minor details may be missing.

(8 points)

Fair description of the potential sites of impact as they relate to the case study. Several details may be missing.

(6 points)

Poor description of the potential sites of impact as they relate to the case study. Many details may be missing.

(4 points)

No description of the potential sites of impact.

(0 points)

Identify an action plan grounded in research that may address concerns posed by the case study (Step 7 of the Planning Table).

Excellent and comprehensive action plan that proposes solutions to the concerns posed by the case study.

Proposed solutions are grounded in research and/or theory.

(20 points)

Good action plan that proposes solutions to the concerns posed by the case study.

Proposed solutions are mostly grounded in research and/or theory but may be missing a few minor details.

(17 points)

Fair action plan that proposes solutions to the concerns posed by the case study.

Proposed solutions are somewhat grounded in research and/or theory but may be missing some details.

(14 points)

Poor action plan that does not successfully propose solutions to the concerns posed by the case study.

Proposed solutions are not well-supported by research and/or theory.

(11 points)

No action plan proposed

-or-

Action plan is not related to the case study

(0 points)

Correct Use of In-text Citations

Correct use of APA citation throughout the essay.

(5 points)

Mostly correct use of APA citation throughout the essay. One or two minor errors.

(4 points)

Use of APA citation throughout the essay with several major errors or omissions.

(3 points)

Inconsistent use of citations.

Incorrect use of APA format.

Many omissions.

(2 points)

No citations included.

(0 points)

Reference List Provided

Reference list that corresponds to citations is provided.

Uses APA format with no errors.

(5 points)

Reference list that corresponds to citations is provided.

Uses APA format with some minor errors.

(4 points)

Reference list is provided but may be missing 1 or 2 entries or does not completely correspond to in-text citations.

Uses APA format with some major errors.

(3 points)

Reference list is provided but does not correspond to in-text citations.

Some effort to format, but not in APA format.

(2 points)

No reference list provided.

No effort to format references.

(0 points)

APA Formatting

All of the following APA formatting requirements are present:

· Title page

· 1” margins

· Pagination

· Double-spacing

· Standard font

(5 points)

Four of the following APA formatting requirements are present:

· Title page

· 1” margins

· Pagination

· Double-spacing

· Standard font

(4 points)

Three of the following APA formatting requirements are present:

· Title page

· 1” margins

· Pagination

· Double-spacing

· Standard font

(3 points)

Two of the following APA formatting requirements are present:

· Title page

· 1” margins

· Pagination

· Double-spacing

· Standard font

(2 points)

Less than 2 of the following APA formatting requirements are present:

· Title page

· 1” margins

· Pagination

· Double-spacing

· Standard font

(0 points)

Quality of Writing

Excellent writing that is well-organized and easy to follow.

No errors in spelling, punctuation,

grammar or usage.

(10 points)

Good writing that is well-organized and easy to follow.

Minor errors in spelling, punctuation,

grammar or usage.

(8 points)

Fair writing that is somewhat organized and easy to follow.

Several errors in spelling, punctuation,

grammar or usage.

(6 points)

Poor writing that is disorganized and difficult to follow.

Many errors in spelling, punctuation,

grammar or usage.

(4 points)

Writing is off topic or unintelligible.

Many errors in spelling, punctuation,

grammar or usage.

(0 points)

Length

Essay is between 1800 - 3200 words in length (not including case study).

(5 points)

Essay is shorter than 1800 words or more than 3200 words (not including case study).

(0 points)

Hide Rubrics

Rubric Name: BEHS 343 AFP Part 3: Parenting Action Plan

Print Rubric

This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.Criteria

Criteria Met

5 points

Criteria Not Met

0 points

Criterion Score

Includes Copy of Case Study

Case study (AFP Part 1) is copied and pasted at the beginning of the document

Case study (AFP Part 1) is not copied and pasted at the beginning of the document.

Score of Includes Copy of Case Study,/ 5

Excellent

5 points

Good

4 points

Fair

3 points

Poor

2 points

Missing or Not Acceptable

0 points

Criterion Score

Statement of the Problem

Concise and well-written statement identifies the key issues that must be explored in order to resolve your case study.

Well-written statement identifies most of the key issues that must be explored in order to resolve your case study.

Clear statement identifies some of the key issues that must be explored in order to resolve your case study.

Many of the key issues that must be explored in order to resolve your case study are missing or incorrect.

Missing a statement about any key issues that must be explored in order to resolve your case study.

Score of Statement of the Problem,/ 5

Use of Scholarly Sources

Effectively incorporates at least 5 scholarly sources.

Effectively incorporates at least 4 scholarly sources.

Effectively incorporates at least 3 scholarly sources.

Effectively incorporates at least 2 scholarly sources.

Incorporates fewer than 2 scholarly sources.

Score of Use of Scholarly Sources,/ 5

Use of Credible Sources