pap 5

2

Individuals Experience Social Loafing in Shared Responsibility

Study one literature review

Social loafing is a latent phenomenon; if not eliminated, it can destroy the entire team's

performance. There are many reasons for procrastination; procrastination adversely affects society

and organizational performance. Social loitering has detrimental effects on team members and

their organizations. A robust effect was demonstrated through social lounging, which was

predicted across the population and all tasks (Thanh & Toan, (2018). Toan (2018) studied that

when people pull a long rope together, their performance is lower compared to by pulling the rope

as individuals. In another study, a researcher experimented with social loitering to find that when

group members worked as a group, they exerted less effort than when they worked as individuals.

In addition, some categories were recognized in the project of stating the existence of social

loitering in physical and cognitive groups, reasons and barriers to the concept of social loitering,

social loitering of group members, adaptations to social loitering as positive mechanisms

Besser (2018) investigated the relationship between narcissism and social loitering through

various cognitive group problem-solving experiments by examining how narcissists performed

and found the presence of social loitering in group problem-solving. Organizational costs of

retention efforts include lower productivity, morale problems, and turnover. Group dispersion and

group size have been reported to affect group work; as group individuals contribute less in quantity

and quality, the final output quality would be lower in contextual and individual factors, and the

out-group would be affected. The leader should do to eliminate loitering in the team.

Many researchers have addressed procrastination factors that have been studied both

organizationally and procedurally. Over the past 30 years, social loitering research has focused on

determining how the effects of social loitering can be modified while initially focusing on the

3

workplace. The largest body of research has recommended individual responsibility and

identification as the most significant factor in reducing social loitering. Employee performance

expresses employees' financial and non-financial results, which is related to the organization's

performance and success. Past studies show fundamental ways to increase employee performance

and engagement.

Study one Methods

This study was conducted using a questionnaire at the Telkom center and focused on

collecting data related to employee performance and social lounging. The study population

revealed that most of the employees working in Pakistan's telecommunication sector are scattered

all over the country, and there is no exact number which was not well known. Since many resources

were limited in conducting this research, probability sampling was used. The employees received

their questionnaire, which they had to fill out in English. In the questionnaire, it was necessary to

fill in several items to capture the research's primary purpose. It is worth noting that social slacker

is measured in a multi-item scale adopted from the general literature. To measure employee

performance, the questionnaires were able to capture 11 items. The unit used in the analysis was

an employee who worked in the telecommunications sector either as a team or as a group. The

questionnaire was closed-ended and consisted of variables with ratings ranging from 1, showing

strongly disagree, to 5, showing strongly agree. The number of completed questionnaires in the

research was 207, which were entered into SPSS for data analysis. Several uncompleted

questionnaires were excluded from the study. Several methods were used, such as descriptive

statistics, T-test, correlation analysis, and regression data analysis.

4

Study One Results

The study's primary objective was to identify the relationship between employee

performance and social Loafing in the telecommunications sector. As part of the research, the

respondent's demographic characteristics were collected. These characteristics included the

household income, gender, marital status, employment nature, qualifications, and age. The result

was able to identify that 15.50% are managers, 20.8% are supervisors, 28.5 are project engineers,

and the rest play other roles in the telecommunications sector.

Based on the participant's qualifications, it was found that 4.3% of employees had the

lowest qualifications and worked in non-managerial positions. It was also found that 29% were

postgraduate students while 60% were graduates, while the rest were associated with higher

education professionals. The data collected included 197 men, who made up 95% of the sample,

and 5% were women who were more associated with the social culture of Pakistan, where most

women do not volunteer in a field related to projects in different parts of the country. It was found

that most of the study participants were over 40 years of age (27.1%). Additionally, 21.7% of

participants were under 30 years of age. However, 31% of respondents had work experience in

telecommunications between 5 and 8 years.

Based on marital status, it was found that 78% were single, while 22% were married, had

an average salary of Rs 60,000 per month, and worked more than 40 hours per week. Table 1.

Below is the internal consistency and reliability of the data.

5

Table 1 shows the reliability and internal consistency of the collected data examined using

Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The results indicate that social loitering has more items (12) with a

Cronbach's alpha (α) of 0.583. At the same time, employee performance illustrates 10 items with

a Cronbach's alpha of 0.882, allowing the study to use the chosen statistical tool in deriving results.

The study hypothesized that employee performance and social lounging are related by the

"correlation analysis" of persons.

Table II shows that team member role is related to employee performance with a correlation

(r=.29, p<.001). At the same time, we can also see that employee perception is also related to

employee performance with a correlation (r=.07,> .001), which is a non-significant relationship.

Social lounging has a robust positive connection with employee performance (r= .22, p<.001), so

it can be concluded that social lounging positively correlates with employee performance. Thus, a

significant result indicates a positive relationship between employee performance and mutual

social loafing. H1 shows a positive relationship between team members' roles and performance.

A significant relationship is noted between employee and team member role performance;

therefore, this hypothesis is accepted. On the other hand, H2 shows a relationship between

employee performance and team perception, but this hypothesis shows an insignificant outcome

and is rejected. Thus, if the perception of a members social loafing causes a decrease in group

6

satisfaction, it may also cause group members to decrease their work effort and expectations of

group success (Tata, 2002). H3 hypothesizes the relationship between social loitering and

employee performance by employing a reliability test. A significant association was found

between social loitering and employee performance, as when an employee tries to falter, his

performance will decrease in collective work. In the telecommunications sector, work is typically

created as in a project and completed. A team employee tends to get slammed because they find

that no one notices their overall effect on the performance of project employees. Group perceptions

of social loafing behavior have decreased performance and satisfaction among group members.

Table III reveals the regression coefficients for the selected variables, i.e., social loitering

as the independent variable, while employee performance is referred to as the dependent variable.

An R-squared value of 0.40 indicates that the predictor can account for 40% of the variance in the

dependent variable. H4 suggests that social loafing has a significant result on employee

performance. A meta-analysis of team performance and cohesion concluded that performance is

significantly related to task commitment (Gettliffe, (2021). Team social cohesion is reported to be

associated with team performance. Theses mentioned in previous sources supported our hypothesis

that the version is also affected by team cohesion as social hanging out.

The results indicate that social lounging was significantly related to employee

performance. It is consistent with past studies as it found a significant relationship between team

cohesion and social lounging. A meaningful relationship is reported between team cohesion and

7

team performance. Additionally, task independence and social loitering were positively related

(Jamshid & Rehman (2018). However, social loitering was reported to have a negative effect on

distributive justice and task visibility.

It is suggested that when participants are given a difficult task, they will take it seriously

and work just as hard on it as they would on the job individually. However, it was found that there

is a negative relationship between social loitering and a co-worker's perceived social loitering (Zhu

& Wang (2018). The study found that a team can perform a task better collectively because

everyone participates and work is divided according to their ability to function. However, as

individuals doing the task for the first time, the question arose here as to whether they would be

able to do the task sufficiently or whether their motivation would decrease.

Rehman (2018) observed female swimmers and found that social slacking is less likely to

occur when there is high team cohesion. Empirical research has examined salespersons' internal

task involvement and internal task visibility and reported a negative relationship with

procrastination. It found that there would be less chance of social loitering if there were cohesion

among team members because everyone thrived in the presence of others. It found that perceptions

of social loitering can be reduced by team cohesion. Team cohesion could influence team

performance and effort (Høigaard (2018). Similarly, a positive relationship of employee

performance between organizational citizenship behavior and conscientiousness is reported. At the

same time, they also found a negative relationship between social loafing and an individual's sense

of responsibility (Wang, (2021).

8

Discussion

This study examines the role of social lounging in employee performance among

employees in the telecommunications sector. There are many reasons for procrastination;

procrastination adversely affects society and organizational performance. Organizations are

adopting team structures to deal with the challenges and issues in the recent era of globalization

and competition. Loafer can be established in any project-oriented organization because there is a

team structure in projects. There are a lot of workers working on the projects. Therefore few

members try to hide behind the efforts of others due to a lack of interest in the work because they

know that no one is watching them and will have the same incentives and compensation as others.

Data were collected from 207 respondents through a structured questionnaire. Statistical tools were

used for data analysis through SPSS. It is concluded that many factors cause social loitering, so it

directly or indirectly affects the employee's performance; it can be inferred that social loitering

negatively affects group members' performance. It is observed that loafing exists in almost every

organization, but it is a fact that no one can accept that they are loafing because everyone loafs to

some extent, e.g., leaving today's tasks for tomorrow; failing to complete the job on time; leave

the hard work to others and depend on subordinates. This research will be helpful for project

managers, experts, project leaders, and the company's top management in evaluating employees'

performance to avoid slackers. In every creation, it is evident that employees who work in a team

automatically exist as a slacker because of the perception of dependencies and hiding behind

others.

9

Study Two Literature

Hettinga (2018) investigated whether or not individual preferences increased group social

lounging. Past studies have looked at situational influences rather than individual differences in

social lounging and attitudes. Social lounging fundamentally affects the growth and development

of web communities. Loitering is the tendency to exert less work effort and rely on the actions of

others. Loiterers regularly participate in online web community discussions but choose not to

expand their knowledge. Since there is no rule of conduct for participating and sharing knowledge

in online communities and the classroom, it is voluntary. Therefore there is no guarantee that an

individual will share knowledge on the web board and discussion forum Zhang (2020). However,

proper small group formation is reported to reduce social loitering.

Chow (2022) investigated the procrastination behavior of students and their performance.

It has been reported that the cause of countless sleepless nights and stress from classroom

assignments is simply that they are doing well, their peers are not doing well, and they are not

participating as required. The main stress reason is choosing the right group member; the reason

is that everyone is afraid of choosing the wrong group member because he is a loafer (Krishna

(2018). Social Loafing and employee performance are closely related and interconnected in the

workplace. It is stated that social loitering in the workplace is the most common phenomenon

among workers with low levels of competence who were associated with teams with high errors.

Perceptions of social loitering among individuals were reported to be directly related to negative

emotions and conflict. Task, logistical, and relational conflicts were not directly associated with

perceptions of social loitering (Wang, (2018).

The literature indicated that high employee engagement, organizational citizenship

behavior, task completion, job performance, customer service and productivity, affective

10

commitment, and discretionary effort increased in psychological climate. Existing literature allows

researchers to create a theoretical foundation and schematic diagram of the study.

11

References

Thanh & Toan, (2018). The relationship between organizational justice and social loafing

in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 5(3),

179-183.

Thanh, & Toan (2018). The relationship between organizational justice and social loafing

in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 5(3),

179-183.

Unger-Aviram, Zeigler-Hill, Barina & Besser (2018). Narcissism, collective efficacy, and

satisfaction in self-managed teams: The moderating role of team goal orientation. Group

Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 22(3), 172.

Get a life, (2021, September). Group cohesion and learning French as a foreign language

in a videoconferencing environment. In Proceedings of ICERI2021 Conference (Vol. 19, pp.

5238-5247). IATED Academy.

Ahmad, Jamshid & Rehman (2018). The emergence of social loafing and employee

performance in the services sector: an empirical investigation of the telecom sector. International

Journal of Management Research and Emerging Sciences, 8(1), 119-126.

Zhu & Wang (2018). A literature review of social loafing and teams with group

development. Available at SSRN 3176383.

Ahmad, Jamshid & Rehman (2018). The emergence of social loafing and employee

performance in the services sector: an empirical investigation of the telecom sector. International

Journal of Management Research and Emerging Sciences, 8(1), 119-126.