history paper-time travel for bethuel best

profileawwyaamiss
PaperIII-TechnologyFactandfictionSP20181.docx

Paper III: Novel, Monograph Movie

8-10 Page paper

History of American Technology

Due December 3, 2018

First - Choose a novel (A FICTIONAL WORK), and a movie (THE PLOT MUST BE

FICTIONAL) relating to the same technology - like computers, the internet, nano-technology, use of technology in industry, the atomic bomb etc. (see posted lists of suggested topics and some possible sources)

Second - Read and view each of the works

Third write 3-page reviews of each of these works – the specifications for movie and book reviews are on the attached pages. Each review should be separate from one another – total pages for this segment is 6 pages.

Fourth, select a journal article on the history of the technology as a case study – the work should explain enough about the technology that you will know what you need to know in order to compare the real technology to the two fictional examples. You should find the article by going on JSTOR through the library’s database the article should be no less than 20 pages in length – 2- or 3-page sources are totally unacceptable as well as brief popular readings. Write a summary of the article’s content no more than a page long.

Fifth, have selected the three sources by November 5, 2018) and provide full bibliographic information for each of the three works plus a statement of the technology represented in all three sources word processed and hard copy brought to class that day to hand in to the Professor that day. No extensions – and if it is not turned in on time you lose 10 points off the grade and your sources will not be approved) Your three choices must not duplicate the choices of anyone else in the class hence I will be setting up a spread sheet of the citations and some of you will have to select different sources after I have identified the repeats.

Sixth, compare the works in an essay using the following questions as a guide. Your essay should not be limited by these questions but build on them. Use the article you have summarized as a check of characteristics of the real technology to be compared to the fictional representations of it.

1. Does the technology play a major or minor role in the studies?

2. How well does the author of the screenplay or book relate the technology to American culture?

3. In what ways is the fictional approach inaccurate?

4. How must the technology be inaccurate to allow the story line to proceed?

5. Look up information about the novelist or screenwriter and his writing to get a feel for what he/she considers when writing such a story.

This section should be 3 pages long.

How to Write a Book Review

A book review is both a description and an evaluation of a book. It should focus on the book's purpose, contents, and authority.

Scan the Book's Preliminaries

Before beginning to read, consider the following:

1. Title - What does it suggest?

2. Preface - Provides important information on the author's purpose in writing the book and will help you to determine the success of the work.

3. Table of Contents - Tells you how the book is organized and will aid in determining the author's main ideas and how they are developed - chronologically, topically, etc.

Read the Text

Record impressions as you read and note effective passages for quoting. Keep these questions in mind:

1. What is the general field or genre, and how does the book fit into it? (Use outside sources to familiarize yourself with the field, if necessary?

2. From what point of view is the work written?

3. What is the author's style? Is it formal or informal? Does it suit the intended audience? If a work of fiction, what literary devices does the author use?

4. Are concepts clearly defined? How well are the author's ideas developed? What areas are covered/not covered? Why? This helps to establish the book's authority.

5. If a work of fiction, make notes on such elements as character, plot, and setting, and how they relate to the theme of the book. How does the author delineate his characters? How do they develop? What is the plot structure?

6. How accurate is the information in the book? Check outside sources if necessary.

7. If relevant, make note of the book's format - layout, binding, typography, etc. Are there maps, illustrations? Do they aid understanding?

8. Check the back matter. Is the index accurate? What sources did the author use - primary or secondary? How does he make use of them? Make note of important omissions.

9. Finally, what has the book accomplished? Is further work needed? Compare the book to others by this author or by others. (Use the listing in the bibliography.)

Consult Additional Sources

Try to find further information about the author - his/her reputation, qualifications, influences, etc. - any information that is relevant to the book being reviewed and that would help to establish the author's authority. Knowledge of the literary period and of critical theories can also be helpful to your review. Your professor and/or reference librarian will be able to suggest sources to use.

Prepare an Outline

Carefully review your notes and attempt to unify your impressions into a statement that will describe the purpose or thesis of your review. Then, outline the arguments that support your thesis. Your arguments should develop the thesis in a logical manner.

Write the Draft

Skim your notes again; then, using the outline as a guide and referring to notes when necessary, begin writing. Your book review should include the following:

1. Preliminary Information - the complete bibliographic citation for the work ie, title in full, author, place, publisher, date of publication, edition statement, pages, special features (maps, color plates, etc.), price and Example:

Rory Maclean, Under the Dragon in a betrayed land, London: Harper Collins, 1998. 224pp.

$37.50

Centered in the middle of the page before the body of your review.

2. Introduction - Try to capture the reader's attention with your opening sentence. The introduction should state your central thesis, and set the tone of the review.

3. Development - Develop your thesis using supporting arguments as set out in your outline. Use description, evaluation, and if possible explanation of why the author wrote as he/she did. Use quotations to illustrate important points or peculiarities.

4. Conclusion - If your thesis has been well argued, the conclusion should follow naturally. It can include a final assessment or simply restate your thesis. Do not introduce new material at this point.

Revise the Draft

1. Allow some time to elapse before going over your review, to gain perspective.

2. Carefully read through the text, looking for clarity and coherence.

3. Correct grammar and spelling.

4. Verify quotes for proper footnoting.

How to Write A Movie Review Movie reviews are a wonderful way of evaluating movies. Regardless of the type of movie or the age of the movie, movie reviews allow people to determine whether or not they think they might like a movie before ever seeing it. When writing a movie review, there are several different guidelines to follow.

Criteria The following outline offers the basic elements that should be found in any good movie review. Not all of the elements listed below may be applicable to all movies, however, these criteria provide a general overview for all components that should be included in a basic movie review.

___Title of Review

___Name of movie being reviewed

___What genre is the movie a part of

___Are the characters in the movie easy to understand?

___Evaluate Acting

___Briefly summarize the plot (do not use more than 1 paragraph to summarize) ___Briefly summarize how the movie incorporates the technology in question.

___Is the movie easy to follow?

___Compare to other movies of the same genre

___Director

___What other movies has this director done?

___Overall rating

All reviews should be objective and impartial, and should be carefully written.

Keep in mind the questions that you will be answering in the fourth part of the project paper. Be sure to provide the information necessary to respond to those questions in relation to other works you’ve used in this review.