PERSONAL COUNSELING THEORY
Criteria Ratings Points
Background: Factors Influencing Distress
17 to >15 pts
Advanced
Paper clearly delineates how the client’s background, emoti ons/sensations, thoughts, actions, and family/cultural systems interrelate to create distress.
15 to >14 pts
Proficient
Paper delineates how the client’s background, emotio ns/sensations, thoughts, actions, and family/cultural systems interrelate to create distress.
14 to >13 pts
Developing
Paper somewhat delineates how the client’s background, emotio ns/sensations, thoughts, actions, and family/cultural systems interrelate to create distress.
13 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Paper rarely delineates how the client’s background, emotions/sensation s, thoughts, actions, and family/cultural systems interrelate to create distress.
0 pts
Not Present
17 pts
Content: Theory Based Treatment Strategies
67 to >62 pts
Advanced
All components as described in the assignment have been thoroughly addressed. Assertions are relevant and properly supported by evidence. The conclusion offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper and offers practical application (key mechanisms, treatment strategies, biblical principles/biblical worldview application, scientific research identified).
62 to >57 pts
Proficient
All components as described in the assignment have been addressed. Assertions are mostly relevant and mostly supported by evidence. The conclusion offers a summary of issues treated in the paper and offers application.
57 to >53 pts
Developing
Most components as described in the assignment have been addressed, or all components are present but need improvement. Some assertions are relevant and supported by evidence. The conclusion may need improvement.
53 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Few components as described in the assignment have been addressed, or all components are missing. The conclusion is weak or is not present in the paper.
0 pts
Not Present
67 pts
Personal Counseling Theory Paper Grading Rubric | EDCO715_B02_202530
Criteria Ratings Points
Integration of Christian Worldview
67 to >62 pts
Advanced
• Theological Implications for Counseling have been thoroughly addressed. • Assertions are relevant and properly supported by evidence. Content is noticeably supported by pertinent sources.
62 to >59 pts
Proficient
• Theological Implications for Counseling have been addressed but needs improvement. • Some assertions are relevant and supported by evidence. • Content is marginally supported by pertinent sources.
59 to >56 pts
Developing
• Theological Implications for Counseling have been addressed. • Assertions are mostly relevant and mostly supported by evidence. Content is supported by pertinent sources.
56 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
• Theological Implications for Counseling was poorly addressed or not at all. • Content lacks pertinent sources.
0 pts
Not Present
67 pts
Conclusion 17 to >15 pts
Advanced
The conclusion offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper and offers practical application.
15 to >14 pts
Proficient
The conclusion offers a summary of issues treated in the paper and offers application.
14 to >13 pts
Developing
The conclusion needs improvement.
13 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The conclusion is weak or is not present in the paper.
0 pts
Not Present
17 pts
Personal Counseling Theory Paper Grading Rubric | EDCO715_B02_202530
Criteria Ratings Points
Organizatio n
24 to >22 pts
Advanced
• All required elements are included and presented with strong headings and organizational clarity. • There are clear transitions between paragraphs and sections. • The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. • The paper meets the page length requirement.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
• All required elements are included and organized. • There are transitions between paragraphs and sections. • The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. • The paper meets the page length requirement or comes very close.
20 to >18 pts
Developing
• Most required elements are included and are mostly organized. • Most paragraphs and sections have transitions. • The logical treatment of the topic needs improvement. • The paper may not meet the page length requirement.
18 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
• Few or no required elements are included. • Few or no transitions exist between paragraphs and sections. • There may not be a logical treatment of the topic. • The paper does not meet the page length requirement.
0 pts
Not Present
24 pts
Style 24 to >22 pts
Advanced
• The paper properly uses current APA style. • Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted correctly. • The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. • There are very few spelling and grammar errors.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
• The paper consistently uses current APA style with few or no exceptions. • Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted with few or no errors. • The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. • There are few spelling and grammar errors.
20 to >18 pts
Developing
• The paper inconsistently uses APA style. • Headings, in-text citations, and references are inconsistently formatted. • The paper does not consistently reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. • There are spelling and grammar errors.
18 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
• The paper erroneously uses or does not use APA style. • Headings, in-text citations, and references are erroneously formatted or not present. • The paper does not reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. • There are numerous spelling and grammar errors.
0 pts
Not Present
24 pts
Personal Counseling Theory Paper Grading Rubric | EDCO715_B02_202530
Criteria Ratings Points
Sources 24 to >22 pts
Advanced
The reference page meets or exceeds the required 15 sources.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
The reference page almost meets the required number of sources.
20 to >18 pts
Developing
The reference page does not meet the required number of sources.
18 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The reference page is not present or contains few sources.
0 pts
Not Present
24 pts
Total Points: 240
Personal Counseling Theory Paper Grading Rubric | EDCO715_B02_202530