Matrix mapping of a key IT-related organizational
Sillyrabbit54
PaperBGradingRubric.pdf
6/21/2021 Rubric Assessment - IFSM 304 6980 Ethics in Information Technology (2215) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=581859&evalObjectId=1112297&evalObjectType=1&userId=1… 1/5
Paper B - Fall 2019 Course: IFSM 304 6980 Ethics in Information Technology (2215)
/ 0.5
/ 0.5
/ 0.5
Criteria Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 New Level Criterion Score
Ethical Issue -
Select a
specific
ethical issue in
accord with
the LP
requirements.
Stakeholders -
Identify
stakeholders
regarding the
issue.
Principles -
Choose three
normative
ethics
principles
from Week
Three for
evaluation of
the issue.
0.5 points
The ethical issue selected was within the parameters defined and was narrowed down to a specific concern.
0.4 points
The ethical issue
selected was
within the
parameters
defined, but was
of a general, not
specific nature..
0.3 points
The ethical issue selected was too broad, and included sub-issues.
0 points
The ethical issue
was not defined
0.5 points
Three or more of the stakeholders directly connected with the ethical issue were identified.
0.4 points
Two of the stakeholders directly connected with the ethical issue were identified
0.3 points
.Only one of the stakeholders directly connected with the ethical issue were identified
0 points
None of the
stakeholders
directly
connected with
the ethical issue
were identified
0.5 points
The three principles identified were logically associated with the ethical issue selected.
0.4 points
The three principles identified had an ambiguous association with the selected ethical issue.
0.3 points
The three principles identified had a weak or no relation with the selected ethical issue.
0 points
The three
principles
identified had no
relation with the
selected ethical
issue
6/21/2021 Rubric Assessment - IFSM 304 6980 Ethics in Information Technology (2215) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=581859&evalObjectId=1112297&evalObjectType=1&userId=1… 2/5
/ 4.5
/ 4
/ 2
Criteria Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 New Level Criterion Score
Effects of
Issue -
Determine the
effects of the
issue upon the
stakeholders
considering
the principles
selected.
Matrix
Explanation -
Explain the
choice of
issue, the
choice of
principles, and
a short
analysis of the
research used
to identify the
actions in the
matrix.
Overview of
policy
4.5 points
The effects of the issue on the stakeholders, according to the chosen principles demonstrated a critical thinking process.
3.6 points
The effects of the issue on the stakeholders, according to the chosen principles demonstrated a good thinking process.
2.7 points
The effects of
the issue on the
stakeholders,
according to the
chosen principles
demonstrated a
weak thinking
process
0 points
The effects of
the issue on the
stakeholders,
according to the
chosen principles
did not
demonstrate
logical thinking.
4 points
The paper provided an excellent explanation of the three required points within the length specified.
3.2 points
The paper provided a good explanation of the three required points, but was short of the length specified.
2.4 points
The paper
provided a
satisfactory
explanation of
the three
required points,
but was short of
the length
specified
0 points
The paper did
not provide an
explanation for
each of the three
required points.
2 points
The overview
fully introduces
the ethical issue
and its facets.
1.6 points
The overview
partially
introduces the
ethical issue and
its facets.
1.2 points
The overview
introduces the
ethical issue,
and its facets in
a cursory manner
0 points
The overview
does not
introduce the
ethical issue, and
its facets
6/21/2021 Rubric Assessment - IFSM 304 6980 Ethics in Information Technology (2215) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=581859&evalObjectId=1112297&evalObjectType=1&userId=1… 3/5
/ 2
/ 2
/ 2
/ 2
Criteria Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 New Level Criterion Score
Purpose of
policy
Scope (roles
and
responsibilitie
s of
stakeholders)
Policy Points -
this section
should discuss
the specific
measures,
needs, or
changes to
behavior
within the
organization
in terms of
policy points
Policy
sanctions for
non-
compliance
2 points
The purpose of
the policy is
crystal clear and
there should be
no question why
it was put in
place
1.6 points
The purpose of
the policy was
good and there
may be a
question as to
why it was put in
place
1.2 points
The purpose of
the policy could
have been
clearer and there
are questions as
to why it was put
in place
0 points
The purpose of
the policy was
not clear and
there are
questions
regarding its
applicability
2 points
The extent of the
roles and
responsibilities
of the
stakeholders was
fully defined
1.6 points
The extent of the
roles and
responsibilities
of the
stakeholders was
partially defined
1.2 points
The extent of the
roles and
responsibilities
of the
stakeholders
could have had
better definition
0 points
The extent of the
roles and
responsibilities
of the
stakeholders was
not defined.
2 points
The policy points
placed in force at
the
organizational
unit were fully
described
1.6 points
The policy points
placed in force at
the
organizational
unit were
partially
described
1.2 points
The policy points
placed in force at
the
organizational
unit were
cursorily
identified.
0 points
The policy points
placed in force at
the
organizational
unit were not
identified
2 points
The penalties of
non-compliance
with the policy
were fully
discussed
1.6 points
The penalties of
non-compliance
with the policy
were only
partially
discussed.
1.2 points
The penalties of
non-compliance
were briefly
mentioned in a
cursory fashion
0 points
The penalties of
non-compliance
were not
included.
6/21/2021 Rubric Assessment - IFSM 304 6980 Ethics in Information Technology (2215) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=581859&evalObjectId=1112297&evalObjectType=1&userId=1… 4/5
Total / 23
/ 1
/ 1
/ 1
Criteria Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 New Level Criterion Score
External
References
APA
Compliance
Mechanics
Grammar - .25
Contractions
- .20 Spelling -
.20
Punctuation -
.20
Green/Red
Lines - .15
1 point
A minimum of
three or more
outside
references have
been provided
which are
current, with
URLs provided
0.8 points
Only two outside
references have
been provided
which are
current, with
URLs provided.
0.6 points
Only one outside
reference has
been provided
which is current,
with a URL
provided
0 points
No outside
references were
provided
1 point
Reference list
and in-text
citations were in
full compliance
with APA style
requirements
0.8 points
Reference list
and in-text
citations were in
general
compliance with
APA style
requirements
0.6 points
Only a token
amount of the
sources and in-
text citations
were referenced
in accord with
APA style
requirements
0 points
All sources and
in-text citations
were NOT
referenced in
accord with APA
style
requirements
1 point
Grammar,
contractions,
spelling, and
punctuation
correctly applied.
0.8 points
Some grammar,
contractions,
spelling, or
punctuation
errors exist.
Underlined
errors in MS
Word not
corrected
0.6 points
There were many
grammar,
contractions, and
spelling errors.
Punctuation not
correctly applied.
Underlined
errors in MS
Word not
corrected
0 points
There were
numerous
grammar,
contractions, and
spelling errors.
Punctuation not
correctly applied.
Underlined
errors in MS
Word not
corrected.
6/21/2021 Rubric Assessment - IFSM 304 6980 Ethics in Information Technology (2215) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=581859&evalObjectId=1112297&evalObjectType=1&userId=1… 5/5
Overall Score
Level 1 9.6 points minimum
Level 2 7.2 points minimum
Level 3 0 points minimum
