| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| EDL-805 | EDL-805-O500 | Social Networking and Collaboration | 254.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| How to facilitate social networking technology with current teachers. | 20.0% | Content does not demonstrate how to facilitate social networking among current teachers. | Content demonstrating how to facilitate social networking among current teachers is vague and/or the purpose is not clear. | Content demonstrates how to facilitate the use of social networking among current teachers. | Content provides strategies to facilitate the use of social networking among current teachers. | Content provides specific strategies to facilitate the use of social networking among current teachers. Claims are supported with research. |
| Analyze trends in participation of different generational groups. | 20.0% | Content does not analyze trends in social networking of different generational groups. | Content analyzing trends in social networking of different generational groups is vague and/or not clear. | Content analyzes trends in social networking of different generational groups. | Content analyzes trends in social networking of different generational groups. Predictions based upon trends are provided.. | Content analyzes trends in social networking of different generational groups. Predictions based upon trends are provided. Trends and predictions are supported with current research. |
| Future improvements in technology | 15.0% | Content does not explore future improvements in technology. | Content exploring future improvements in technology is vague and/or not clear. | Content explores future improvements in technology. | Content explores future improvements in technology. Specific ramifications for the field of education and collaboration are provided. | Content explores future improvements in technology. Specific ramifications for the field of education are provided. Trends and implications are supported with current research. |
| Shift in age/generation employment in education | 15.0% | Content does not explore the shift in age/generation employment in education. | Content exploring the shift in age/generation employment is vague and/or not clear. | Content explores shift in age/generation employment in education. | Content explores shift in age/generation employment in education. Specific ramifications for the field of education and collaboration are provided. | Content explores shift in age/generation employment in education. Specific ramifications for the field of education are provided. Age/generation trends and implications are supported with current research. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses unreliable sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | No reference page is included. No citations are used. | Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. | Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. | Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. | In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Kam2004
Paper7Rubric.xlsx
