paper 4

Paper 4 – Leader Analysis

For Leader Analysis Paper #4, please submit a 4-5 page (minimum) double-spaced paper that details the following:

1.   Specifically, how did your leader display (or not display) aspects of Ethics and Professional Codes of Conduct (Unit 10), Managing Conflict (Unit 11), Strategic Planning (Unit 12) and Power and Politics (Unit 13). Please include citations and references to Units 10, 11, 12 and 13 reading materials that support your answers.

2.  How can you apply the conclusions of your assessment and analysis to leadership roles and responsibilities in your organization?

Table of Contents

Ethics and Professional Codes of Conduct………1

Managing Conflict……..2

Strategic Planning…….3

Power and Planning…….4

Application of Analysis to Leadership roles and responsibilities…….5

Preliminary Sources of Weekly Research………6

Conclusion – Add point 2 highlighted above………7

References……..8

Rubric

Leadership Analysis Papers Rubric

Leadership Analysis Papers Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccurately described the leader's style, traits and/or behaviours.	5 pts Excellent Fully described. No additional improvement is necessary. 4 pts Good Mostly described. Only minimal improvement is necessary. 3 pts Acceptable Moderately described. Improvement is necessary. 2 pts Unacceptable Minimally described. Room for significant improvement. 1 pts Unacceptable Did not accurately describe. 0 pts No marks	5 pts
Applied course material to what you learned about the leader.	5 pts Excellent Fully applied. No improvement necessary 4 pts Good Mostly applied. Minimal improvement is necessary. 3 pts Acceptable Moderately applied. Improvement is necessary. 2 pts Unacceptable Minimallyapplied. Room for significant improvement. 1 pts Unacceptable Did not apply course material. 0 pts No marks	5 pts
Used citations from the week's reading materials.	5 pts Excellent Fully cited course materials. No improvement is necessary. 4 pts Good Mostly cited course materials. Only minimal improvement necessary. 3 pts Acceptable Moderately cited course materials. Improvement is necessary. 2 pts Unacceptable Minimally cited. Room for significant improvement. 1 pts Unacceptable Did not cite appropriately. 0 pts No marks	5 pts
Wrote with sufficient detail.	5 pts Excellent Fully detailed. No further improvement is necessary. 4 pts Good Mostly detailed. Only minimal improvement is necessary. 3 pts Acceptable Moderately detailed. Improvement is necessary. 2 pts Unacceptable Minimal detail. Room for significant improvement. 1 pts Unacceptable Did not provide sufficient detail. 0 pts No marks	5 pts
Used appropriate grammar, punctuation and masters-level writing style	5 pts Excellent Fully used appropriate writing style. No further improvements are necessary. 4 pts Good Mostly used appropriate writing style. Only minimal improvement necessary. 3 pts Accceptable Moderately used appropriate writing style. Improvement is necessary. 2 pts Unacceptable Minimally used appropriate writing style. Room for significant improvement. 1 pts Unacceptable Did not use appropriate writing style. 0 pts No marks	5 pts
Total Points: 25