paper
Shakespeare in Film Paper 1 instructions
Paper 1 assignment instructions -
● 20% of final grade ● 3-5 double-spaced pages (If for some reason you want to write a longer paper,
talk to me first!) ● on any of the films assigned in the class or, with permission, another adaptation
of one of the plays we will read (e.g., The Lion King adapts Hamlet, and there are several well-known Romeo and Juliet adaptations from the last several decades)
Choose one of the following options:
1) Film review
This assignment will give you the opportunity to move beyond a description of film techniques and/or theory by evaluating an entire film. A film review judges the quality of a film and provides enough information to support the writer’s evaluation.
Good reviews offer an overview of the film somewhere in the early part of the text, followed by a detailed description of a number of scenes, film techniques, and/or details about the acting, script, or other elements involved in filmmaking. Don’t write about the whole film chronologically! Instead, shape your paper and your interpretation of the film, elaborating on the details that develop your point of view. This doesn’t mean that you should ignore details that seem to contradict your reading, however. You should also address contrary evidence or counter arguments, but explain why they don’t negate your argument. You may also want to concede some points; that is, you may want to highlight some of the film’s strengths even though you are not recommending it overall. In the end, you need to judge the film, but if you have done so with equanimity and by offering strong evidence to support your reading, the piece will not come off as off-puttingly opinionated or overly biased. You should also strive to draw on the concepts and terminology of film studies to offer as precise an analysis of the film as possible. And be sure to mention any particularly striking details of the film, such as unusual editing, costumes, acting style, color, etc. There are also certain conventions that need to be followed in review writing, so you may want to look at several reviews to familiarize yourself with them. Make sure you’ve included a plot synopsis in the early portion of your review, but be careful of revealing key surprising choices or plot twists.
2) Critical analysis
The analytical paper differs from the film review in that it is not primarily evaluative. Rather, this assignment allows you analyze film in terms of its social, political, and ideological contexts by focusing on a close reading of the text. You will apply the methodology of film studies and/or critical theory in order to make an argument about the logic or aesthetic of a particular movie. You will not have room to talk about the whole movie, but should choose two or three scenes or themes that support your reading of the movie or some aspect of it. You should demonstrate how techniques contributes
1
Shakespeare in Film Paper 1 instructions
to the overall meaning of the film so that you’re conscious of your thesis through the entire paper. While this is not technically a research paper (i.e., you are not required to include and assess other scholarship), you will find it useful to read some recent scholarship on the film to familiarize yourself with other interpretations, which you can then engage with. This will also allow you to better understand how scholars of film structure and support their arguments. Pay particular attention to how scholars begin and end their articles, as these are difficult to do well. Neither should simply summarize your argument.
Either option should:
● have a clear and explicit thesis statement or claim (it is not required that this be expressed in the last sentence of your introduction, though that is frequently a good choice, but make sure you use signposting so that your reader doesn’t fail to see the importance of that sentence, wherever it appears)
● make use of the vocabulary of film studies and/or the strategies of one or more critical theories to support your interpretation and/or evaluation
● meet the expectations of your particular genre, context, and audience - you learn to do this by paying attention to how others are writing for that same genre, context, and audience, and imitating them
● be reasonably error-free - I don’t grade with a red pen in hand or seek out grammatical missteps, but if errors of proofreading, editing, or grammar distract me, it will affect my evaluation (spellcheck is literally built-in to your word processor; please use it!)
Due dates
1) Draft 1, in extended prose or outline form - due at the beginning of class 10/20 in hard copy (printed or hand-written) (NB we will have informal group peer review in class that day, meaning your draft or outline will be read and assessed by several random classmates; if you want your paper to be anonymous, don’t put your name on it. You’ll be able to retrieve it after class.)
In addition to following the basic assignment requirements, either first draft option should:
● have a succinct thesis statement or claim expressed in a clear and complete sentence
● have multiple reasons that explicitly support the thesis (how many depends on your argument)
● show awareness of counter-arguments and other possible interpretations, whether or not you choose to address them at length
2
Shakespeare in Film Paper 1 instructions
● organize the reasons according to some logical principle (i.e., you should know how they relate to each other, and have given some thought to why you’ve put them in the order you did)
● demonstrate some understanding of audience (I and your classmates are your audience: what do we know, what will we need explained or summarized, what do we care about, what are we interested in, and how are you going to get and maintain our attention?)
● include at least two questions for your readers about places where you are struggling or unsure - the more specific the better: i.e., ‘do I need to address the counter argument to this point?’; ‘does this reason actually support my thesis?’; ‘is the relationship between these reasons clear?’; ‘is there a better example for this reason?’ are going to get you more useful responses than ‘is this interesting?’
If doing the prose draft option, paper should be 800-1200 words in complete sentences. Introduction and conclusion are not required (these are often best left for last / later drafts).
If doing the outline option, bullet points and incomplete sentences are fine after the thesis statement, but there should be evidence that you have given serious thought to the ideas. There is no length requirement, but aim for 3-4 well developed reasons with examples and evidence. As with the draft, introduction and conclusion are not required.
Draft 1 is not graded but will receive feedback from at least three students that should guide your revisions. I am available in office hours to provide feedback on any stage of the paper, from brainstorming to final polishing. You can also make use of Temple’s writing center for additional support.
2) Revised, polished paper due 11/3 in class, in hard-copy, printed and double-spaced. Single- or double-sided printing is fine. Use a standard 12-point font with standard 1” margins. Make sure you include a title. Any citations or references should follow MLA format.
3
Shakespeare in Film Paper 1 instructions
Evaluation criteria
You will earn a failing grade if the paper:
● does not follow the assignment guidelines ● is late ● does not contain detailed, concrete examples ● does not make use of film concepts and terminology and/or critical and
theoretical principles
You will earn in the D/C range if the paper:
● is submitted on time and addresses the requirements of the assignment, but is otherwise incomplete, lacking in detail, or too short
● has substantial problems with grammar or typos ● includes concrete examples but does not develop them substantively ● shows evidence of critical thinking and logical reasoning ● attempts to use film terminology and/or theoretical principles, though it may fall
short of full engagement
You will earn in the C+/B range if the paper:
● is submitted on time and follows the requirements of the assignment ● has minimal typos and reasonably solid control of grammar and language ● addresses a scene or element of the film in substantive detail ● shows clear evidence of critical thinking ● contains technical language and/or theoretical principles explained in depth ● demonstrates evidence of engagement and thoughtfulness:
○ a good-faith first draft or outline for peer review ○ has a clear argument that is supported logically with reasons and evidence ○ uses signposting to keep the reader oriented ○ shows a grasp of the elements shaping the genre (review or analysis)
You will earn in the B+/A range if the paper:
● meets all the criteria for the C+/B paper ● asks insightful and relevant questions of the film and explores the issues
surrounding those questions ● gets beyond obvious or superficial analysis to comment on larger implications ● makes connections with ideas or details from assigned readings or class
discussions
4