Summary Review

Criteria Ratings Points

Content 24 to >22 pts

Advanced

The Summary not only shows the professor that the student understands the contents of Entwistle (2015), Chapters 8-11, but the student has done an exceptionally good job in identifying all 6 models of integration, and they compare the various models at a truly graduate level of writing. This section is a minimum of one page in length, but often will be more.

22 to >19 pts

Proficient

The Summary shows the professor that the student understands the contents of Entwistle (2015), Chapters 8-11. The student identifies all 6 models of integration, and they compare the various models. This section is a minimum of one page in length, but often will be more.

19 to >0 pts

Developing

The Summary does not clearly show the professor that the student understands the 6 models of integration completely (Entwistle, 2015). All 6 models are not identified and described. Important points of the Chapters are not included, and the models are not adequately described. The writing of the summary section is clearly less than a page.

0 pts

Not Present

Not discussed.

24 pts

Content 23 to >21 pts

Advanced

The interaction section not only includes an Initial response to the article, comments about Entwistle’s (2015) models, and insights gained from the chapters, but the student has offered exceptional insight at a truly graduate level. The student has done exceptional work in relating the ideas from Entwistle to ideas from 3 or more scholarly articles, books, ethical codes, and/or websites. Additionally, the student has done an exceptional job in connecting Entwistle’s models to scriptural ideas with reference to specific passages or theological concepts. The length of this section is at least two pages, but it can be more if it follows the content of the article.

21 to >19 pts

Proficient

The Interaction section includes an Initial response to the article, comments about Entwistle’s (2015) models, and insights gained from the chapters. It includes a discussion about which model or models the student currently identifies with. It also includes information from a minimum of two other academic sources outside the article (previous textbooks, journal articles, ACA ethical codes, etc.) that relate to what Entwistle (2015) shared in these chapters. It also includes a Scriptural component in this discussion. The length of this section is approximately two pages, but it can be more if it follows the content of the Entwistle chapters.

19 to >0 pts

Developing

The Interaction section reflects surface analysis of the 6 models and the Entwistle (2015) chapters, or it fails to include information about all 6 models of integration. It includes a statement about which model the student identifies with, but the student does not give adequate reasons for their decision. It fails to include insights gained from reading the chapters. It includes less than two academic sources and/or one Scriptural idea in this section. The length of this section is approximately one page.

0 pts

Not Present

This area is not included in the paper.

23 pts

Paper: Entwistle Review Grading Rubric | COUC506_D10_202320

Criteria Ratings Points

Content 23 to >20 pts

Advanced

The Application is at least one page of text. It not only includes how the student will apply the concepts from Entwistle (2015) in the formation of their counseling identity, but the student truly communicates it at an exceptionally good level as a graduate student. The student shows how they will use the 6 models in relating to clients who may operate from a different model of integration than they do personally. The student also includes scriptural and/or theological discussion in their own counselor identity formation.

20 to >18 pts

Proficient

The Application is approximately one page of text. It shows how the student will apply the concepts from Entwistle (2015) in the formation of their counseling identity, as well as how they will relate to clients who may operate from a different model of integration than they do personally.

18 to >0 pts

Developing

Application is underdeveloped, and core ideas of the Entwistle (2015) chapters are unrelated (or missing) to how they will use these models in their life and professional identity.

0 pts

Not Present

There is no application made.

23 pts

Structure 20 to >17 pts

Advanced

The paper is exceptionally well written at a graduate level of writing. No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently (NO second person pronouns). Writing is precise. Word choice is excellent.

17 to >15 pts

Proficient

A few minor grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are not always used correctly (NO second person pronouns). Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is generally fine.

15 to >0 pts

Developing

Several or many grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present throughout the paper. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Second person pronouns are used throughout the paper (you, your, you’re). Word choice is generally poor and not understandable all the time. The writing is not at a graduate level. Professor may consider a referral to the LU Online Writing Center.

0 pts

Not Present

20 pts

Paper: Entwistle Review Grading Rubric | COUC506_D10_202320

Criteria Ratings Points

Structure 10 to >8 pts

Advanced

Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page, Citations, Running head, and References are all correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12-point Times New Roman font. An Abstract is not needed.

8 to >7 pts

Proficient

Citations and format are in current APA style with a few errors. Cover page, Citations, Running head, and References are present with a few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12-point Times New Roman font.

7 to >0 pts

Developing

Several APA formatting errors are present, including Cover page, Citations, Running head, and References. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect. Numerous citation omissions occur throughout the paper by not giving credit for the ideas written by the student. Professor may consider a referral to the LU Online Writing Center.

0 pts

Not Present

The paper is clearly not written in APA formatting at all, and a LU Online Writing Center Referral will be made by the professor for the student.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Paper: Entwistle Review Grading Rubric | COUC506_D10_202320