Presentation Powerpoint
\
UN/POP/EGM/2017/12
6 September 2017
UNITED NATIONS EXPERT GROUP MEETING ON
SUSTAINABLE CITIES, HUMAN MOBILITY
AND INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION Population Division
Department of Economic and Social Affairs
United Nations Secretariat
New York
7-8 September 2017
Drivers of Migration and Urbanization in Africa: Key Trends and Issues
Mariama Awumbila
Centre for Migration Studies
University of Ghana
Legon, Ghana
Drivers of Migration and Urbanization in Africa: Key Trends and Issues
Background Paper prepared for UN Expert Group Meeting on Sustainable Cities, Human Mobility and International Migration
7-8, September 2017
Mariama Awumbila
Centre for Migration Studies
University of Ghana
Legon, Ghana
September 2017
1.0 Introduction
Urbanisation is increasingly being acknowledged as one of the defining issues of the twenty-first century.
More than half of the world’s population now live in towns and cities and that figure is projected to rise to
75% by 2050 (United Nations Population Division, 2014), with most of this urban growth concentrated in
Africa and Asia. In the developing world, Africa’s urban transition is proceeding rapidly, with the
accumulated relative growth rate of its cities now among the highest in the world. Although in absolute
terms, Asian cities still remain the world’s fastest growing, the global share of African urban dwellers is
projected to rise from 11.3 per cent in 2010 to a 20.2 per cent by 2050, with almost two-thirds of its
population growth expected to occur in urban areas (UN HABITAT, 2014). Migration is a significant
contributor to urban growth and to the urbanization process, as people move in search of social and
economic opportunity and from environmental deterioration. However, the capacity of urban towns to plan
for and cater for the increasing migrants by providing employment, access to land and basic amenities are
limited leading to a largely negative policy position of governments, city authorities, and often host
communities, on migration into urban areas.
Despite this largely negative view of urban growth in Africa, urban areas are “becoming not just the
dominant form of habitat for humankind, but also the engine-rooms of human development as a whole”
(UN-Habitat, 2014). Despite obvious challenges, growing cities in Africa also provide opportunities for
migrants to create livelihoods, engage in entrepreneurship and accumulate assets, thus contributing to
human capital development. This rapid urban growth presents opportunities as well as challenges, and
Africa’s economic, social and environmental development will depend on how this growth is handled.
Despite the centrality of migration and migrants in the urbanisation process not much focus has been put
on the interaction between urbanisation and migration in Africa.
This background note examines trends in urbanization and migration patterns in Africa and assesses their
implications for the development of sustainable and inclusive cities and for Africa's sustainable
development. It argues that if Africa is to harness its gains from urbanisation, then migration and how it is
governed, should be at the frontline of urban planning and sustainable development.
2.0 Key Migration Trends In Africa
Migration has always played a central role in the livelihood and advancement strategies of both rural and
urban populations in Africa. However past and contemporary migration trends and patterns have seen
dynamic trajectories. This section provides a brief discussion of the key migration patterns and trends in
Africa and how these have provided the context for rapid urbanisation in Africa.
Although the focus is often on African migration to Europe and North America, the bulk of African
migration takes place within the continent, as people circulate within Africa, looking for economic
opportunities. Contemporary African international migration flows therefore remains largely intra-regional
in nature and not to the global north as media perceptions seem to portray. Although there is a dearth of
adequate and reliable data, analysis using recent data from the Global Bilateral Migration data base and the
migration and visa data bases from the determinants of international migration (DEMIG project) (Flahaux
and De Hass, 2016) and census data from 15 ECOWAS countries (Awumbila et al, 2014) confirms that the
majority of African migrants continue to move within the continent. In Sub-Saharan Africa, intra-regional
migration is larger (67 percent) than migration to other regions. Major destination countries within Africa
are South Africa, Côte d’Ivoire, Nigeria, Kenya, and Ethiopia. In West Africa in particular intra-regional
movements make up 84% of migration movements making it the region with the largest intra-regional
movements (SWAC and OECD, 2012). Many of these are labour migrants moving within the sub region
to take advantage of opportunities in other parts of the sub region, but also increasingly includes young
people moving to take advantage of educational facilities in other parts of the region.
Linked to this, migration in Africa has always had an important cross-border component, partly reflecting
the arbitrary nature of most national boundaries inherited from colonial administrations, partly drawing on
the economic interdependence between ecological zones, and partly encouraged by the creation of regional
political and economic alliances in the 1960s and 1970s (McGranahan et al, 2009). Increasingly, people
also move between regions: for example, in the past decade relatively substantial numbers of West African
citizens have moved, largely to the cities of Southern Africa. While it is very likely for these longer-distance
movements to grow in significance, more localized regional dynamics will remain crucial in shaping
specific patterns of mobility. In southern Africa, the end of apartheid and the integration of South Africa
within the SADC region resulted in a major increase in cross-border and intra-regional mobility. High rates
of rural and urban poverty and high levels of unemployment as well as differential levels of social service
provision have contributed to make mobility an increasingly important livelihood strategy, with South
Africa remaining the preferred destination for many migrants. (Human Sciences Research Council, 2008).
Despite this overwhelming dominance of intra-regional migration within Africa, recent data also indicates
that since about the 1980s there has been an acceleration and diversification of emigration destinations
from outside the continent, beyond colonial and linguistic patterns. Data from the Global Migration Data
base (Flahaux and De Haas, 2016) indicates not only a clear increase in the number of African living in
Europe, North America, and other countries such as Australia and India, but also a diversification of
African emigration to non-European destinations, and particularly towards countries in the far east such as
China, Japan and the Gulf states, as well as some North African countries like Libya, Egypt and Morocco,
which have become major transit countries for migrants seeking to enter the European Union countries
through irregular means. Therefore, generally Africans are continuing to move out of the continent both
as regular as well as irregular migrants. This geographical diversification seems partly driven by the
introduction of visa and other immigration restrictions of traditional destination countries (often former
colonisers) and to a declining influence of the old colonisers and economic growth, labour demand and
more liberal immigration regimes in the new destination countries, but also policies of African regional
groupings such as ECOWAS, and SADC.
Thirdly, for African migration streams, although international migration has received more attention in
recent debates on migration, internal migration within individual African states is far more significant in
terms of the numbers of people involved and perhaps even the quantum of remittances and poverty
reduction potential of these (UNDP, 2009). Within internal movements, the importance of temporary and
seasonal migration for multi-local households and diversified livelihoods is especially critical. Seasonal,
circular and other forms of short ‐ term mobility is especially important in Africa as these are the migrants who are likely to be more vulnerable once they move to the city, and in need of specific social protection
policies. Temporary movement, often but not necessarily on a seasonal basis, has long underpinned the
diversification of income sources by rural households and, importantly, by urban households. Migration is
a key element of income diversification. Research on rural–urban linkages in Mali, Nigeria and Tanzania
found that about 50 per cent of rural households interviewed had at least one migrant member, and that
remittances were a growing component of household budgets (Bah et al., 2003). In Ghana, a migration
survey in five migration source regions of Ghana in 2013 and a follow up survey in 2015 indicated that
65% of households had at least one migrant member in urban areas and sending remittances home was a
top priority for the majority of migrants (Awumbila et al, 2016).
Lastly, within these mobility flows within Africa, rural- urban migration remains a dominant migration
stream. As people increasingly move to cities and towns in search of social and economic opportunities or
as a result of environmental deterioration, migration has become a significant contributor to urbanization.
Urban populations in Africa are expected to triple in the next 50 years, thus changing the profile of the
region and challenging policy makers to harness urbanisation for sustainable and inclusive growth.
What is Driving Migration Trends in and Out of Africa?
Conceptualising Drivers of Migration
"Drivers” of migration have been defined as forces which lead to the inception of migration and to the
perpetuation of movement (Massey et al. 1998, Van Hear et al, 2012) and thus are the factors which get
migration going and keep it going once begun. Explanations of the inception and perpetuation of migration
have often focused on disparities in conditions between different places driving movement. Such ‘Push-
pull’ models suggest that migrants were pushed by low incomes in their countries or regions and pulled by
better prospects in more affluent areas (Lee 1966; Harris and Todaro 1970). Other explanations focus on
the micro or meso level, in household decision-making and in social networks, where migration as a
household strategy is motivated by the need to spread risk, rather than an individual matter (Stark 1991).
Others have underlined the importance of chains, networks and culture in keeping migration going once
the initial movement is made.
Poverty was at first held to be a key driver of migration. However, since the early 1990s it has been
recognised that the poorest often cannot migrate since resources are needed to do so, especially for
international migration (UNDP, 2009, Van Hear et al, 2012). This has led to much debate about the
relationship between migration and development, in particular whether development can reduce the
pressures that drive migration or in fact can stimulate more migration by giving people the resources to
move.
Thus, although the literature identifies several drivers of migration, economic opportunities is often
highlighted as a major driver of migration. However well-acknowledged “drivers”, creating the background
conditions against which decisions to migrate are more likely to be made in Africa, includes social factors
such as the search for educational opportunities or obligations to kin, such as marriage or inheritance
practices, political factors which includes discrimination or persecution, conflict, levels of security and
policy incentives, demographic factors which includes population density and structure and risk of disease.
and environmental factors, including exposure to hazards and land productivity. On a smaller scale,
personal characteristics such as age, sex, education, wealth or marital status may all have an influence on
migration decisions. A study of migrant domestic workers in Ghana (Awumbila et al, 2016) observes that
marital status of female migrant domestic workers, particularly divorced and widowed women was a key
factor influencing migration.
However as highlighted by several studies (Black et al, 2011), drivers of migration do not occur in isolation
from each other. For example, demographic factors are unlikely to drive migration alone, but high densities
for example in combination with low income could well mean that people decide to leave, and
environmental change for instance, by reducing agricultural productivity, can affect economic factors such
as income, especially those of rural people. Thus, migration and urbanisation inter linkages in Africa are
complex and highly context-specific social processes and phenomena, with multiple, multi-directional and
multi-dimensional linkages.
Development Processes as Drivers of Migration in and from Africa:
Although the literature points to several drivers of migration in and from Africa, the focus tends to be put
on poverty, violence and under development as the major drivers of migration. However recent studies
(Flahaux and De Haas, 2016) indicate that the increasing trends of migration out of Africa and also large
numbers circulating intra regionally seems rather to be driven by social processes of development and
social transformation occurring in Africa which have increased Africa’s capabilities and aspirations to
migrate, a trend which is likely to occur in the future.
This is borne out by the fact that African countries with comparatively higher levels of development (such
as in the Maghreb or coastal West Africa) also tend to have the highest intensity of extra-continental
migration, while the poorest countries (such as many landlocked Sub-Saharan countries) have lower levels
of overall emigration and most emigration is dominated by short-distance migration to nearby countries,
thus confirming the ‘mobility transition theory’ (Zelinsky, 1971), which argues that economic
development and concomitant social transformation initially coincide with increasing levels and a larger
geographical reach of emigration. Development processes typically expand people’s access to material
resources, social networks, education, media and knowledge. At the same time, improvements in
infrastructure and transportation, which usually accompany development, make travel less costly and risky,
enabling migration over increasing distances. Thus, increasing income, education and access to information
and networks generally increases people’s capabilities and aspirations to migrate.
Thus, recent increases in African emigration may rather be explained from processes of development and
social transformation which have increased young Africans’ capabilities and aspirations to migrate, a trend
which is likely to continue in the future. Based on the above recent scholars argue the need to focus on
“migration aspirations” (Carling, 2002) rather than drivers as this allows a better understanding of how
several factors can, depending on the situation, shape migration incentives (De Haas, 2007).
The Role of States and Policies as drivers of Migration
While levels of development seem to clearly affect immigration and emigration volumes and the distance
of migration, state policies also play an important role both for the dominant intra-regional migration flows
and the increasing African emigration trends. The role of policies in shaping migration flows in general
and in Africa in particular has been understudied, partly due to the lack of appropriate policy data. However,
the general increase in visa restrictiveness towards African citizens can be a partial driver towards an
increasing spatial diversification of migration patterns away from colonial patterns. This reflects the
broader argument that immigration restrictions change the character of migration rather than decreasing
overall volumes of migration as such.
Migration and Urbanization Linkages: Key Issues and Prospects
Although data from recent population censuses (Potts, 2009, 2012) indicates that Africa is not the world’s
fastest urbanising region, however, what is true is that Africa’s urban population has been growing at an
historically unprecedented rate for decades. Again, although the rate of natural increase in towns, as well
as re-classification of settlements into urban areas accounts for a large percentage of this increase,
significant long-term migration into urban settlements accounts for a significant proportion of this growth.
These have led many researchers to predict an increasingly urbanized future for Africa. Thus, the evidence
indicates that African countries will continue to urbanise, with migration, particularly rural-urban migration
continuing to play an important role in the urbanisation process.
Most of this projected urban growth will take place in intermediate and small cities and not in megacities
such as Lagos or Cairo. Data indicates that on average the “million plus” cities typically absorb only some
25 per cent of countries’ urban growth, while intermediate-sized and smaller cities attract the significant
balance of about 75 per cent (UN-Habitat, 2014). Thus, the vast majority of the additional urban dwellers
will continue to add to the intermediate and small cities. This therefore implies that the need for urban
management is greatest in these intermediate-sized and smaller cities (UN-Habitat, 2014).
Addressing drivers of Migration in countries of Origin and Destination
Until recently migration policies of major destination countries in the global north has tended to focus on
border management, visas and barriers as a tool for controlling migration, and little attention is paid to
migration as an opportunity for development of both sending and receiving countries. More recently a few
African countries have developed migration policies that seeks to maximise the benefits of migration for
the country of origin. There is therefore the need for migration policies that will be beneficial to everybody.
This will entail addressing drivers of migration from perspectives of both countries / regions of origin and
destination in a holistic way. To address migration drivers from this, inter linked perspective, the following
questions are raised:
➢ How can we leverage and enhance the opportunities offered by the large flow of intra-regional labour migrants for Africa's development? What role can regional bodies such as ECOWAS and
SADC and destination and origin countries play to facilitate intra-regional migration within Africa?
➢ How can we promote migrants as resources, beneficial to themselves as well as their communities, (not trapped in a camp) not as a burden on destination countries or lost brain drain on sending
countries, but as a resource? How we transform migrant’s capabilities into a resource? What is
needed for this transformation?
➢ How can we build on brain gain initiatives in countries of origin and destination?
➢ How can we enhance development opportunities in countries of origin through for example implementing programmess to reduce unemployment and poverty in migrant sending
communities, skills development trainings and income generating activities, for youth in migrant
sending communities and agricultural modernization and transformation and reducing spatial
inequalities in development?
➢ How can we improve systematic data collection (including collecting comparable sex- and age- disaggregated data) and analysis towards effective and informed policies that will address the
drivers of migration in a holistic way tailored to different populations and contexts? This would
include the collection of longitudinal data to adequately account for longer-term processes driving
migratory patterns, such as climate change, demographic transitions, and structural transformation.
➢ How can we strengthen cooperation between and among States and other stakeholders on data collection to better predict, understand and address the drivers of migration?
Conclusions
That Africa is witnessing rapid urban growth, with migration, particularly rural-urban migration continuing
to play an important role in the urbanisation process is not in question. Therefore, it is argued that in an
increasingly urbanised world, the development challenges of the 21st century will be met in Africa's cities
and towns and no longer in rural areas. Nevertheless, as UN-Habitat (2014) note, Africa’s population is
currently still well below the 50 per cent urban threshold. This implies that a major re-conceptualization of
countries’ approaches to urban development can still be undertaken. Fortunately, Sustainable Development
Goal 11, commits to “make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable by 2030”
(UNDP, 2015), and thus provides the opportunity for African governments to change the negative
perception of “cities as vessels of problems” to cities as “accelerators and facilitators of sustainable
urbanization and development” as UN-Habitat (2014) urges.
Whether African states can manage the urbanization trends in a way as to harness the benefits of migration
and rapid urbanisation remains to be seen. As the World Migration Report (IOM, 2015, Awumbila, 2015)
notes about two-thirds of the investments in urban infrastructure to 2050 in Africa have yet to be made.
Therefore, the scope is large for new, wide-ranging urban and migration policies and strategies which will
turn African cities and towns into engines of sustainable structural transformation. The 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development and the 2016 common African position on urban development provides the
critical framework for understanding and addressing the drivers of both irregular and regular migration and
to allow individuals to live and work in a healthy, safe and security environment at home or to choose to
migrate safely.
References
Awumbila, M., Y., Benneh, Teye, J.K., and Atiim, G., (2014). Across Artificial Borders: An Assessment of
Labour Migration in the ECOWAS Region. Brussels: ACP Observatoryon Migration. Research Report
2014 ACP/OBS/2014/PUB05
Awumbila, M. (2014b) Linkages between Urbanization, Rural-Urban Migration and Poverty, Outcomes
in Africa. World Migration Report, 2015. Migrants and Cities: New Partnerships to Manage Mobility,
Background Paper, December 2014, IOM, Geneva. www.iom.int/sites/WMR-2015,
Awumbila, M., Teye, J.K., Litchfield, J., Boakye-Yiadom, L., Deshingkar, P., and Quartey, P. (2015) “Are
Migrant Households better off than Non-Migrant Households? Evidence from Ghana” Migrating Out of
Poverty RPC Working Paper No. 28, University of Sussex, Brighton
Awumbila, M. Teye, J.K. and Yaro, J. A (2016) “Of Silent Maids, Skilled Gardeners and Careful Madams:
Gendered Dynamics and Strategies of Migrant Domestic Workers in Accra, Ghana”, Geojournal DOI
10.1007/s10708-016-9711-5.
Black, R., Adger, W. N., Arnell, W. N., Arnell, N. W., Dercon, S., Geddes, A. & Thomas, D. (2011). The
effect of environmental change on human migration. Global Environmental Change. 21S: S3–S11. DOI:
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.001.
De Haas, H. (2007) Turning the Tide? Why Development will not stop Migration. Development and
Change 38 (5) 819-841
Flahaux, M.L and De Haas, H. (2016) African Migration: Trends, Patterns, Drivers. Comparative
Migration Studies (2016) 4:1
Harris, J. and Todaro, M (1970) Migration, Unemployment and Development: A two sector analysis.
American Economic Review: 60(1) 126-142
IOM, 2015 - World Migration Report 2015 Migrants And Cities: New Partnerships To Manage Mobility,
IOM, Geneva
Lee, E. (1966) A Theory of Migration. Demography 3 (1) 47-57
Massey, D. et al (1998) Worlds in Motion: Understanding International Migration at the end of the
Millenium. Oxford, Clarendon press
McGranahan, G.; Schensul, D.; and Singh, G. (2016) Inclusive urbanization: Can the 2030 Agenda be
delivered without it? Environment and Urbanization February 22, 2016 0956247815627522
Potts, D. (2012). Whatever happened to Africa’s rapid urbanization? (Counterpoint Series).London,
England: Africa Research Institute.
Van Hear, N. Bakewell, O. and Long, K (2012) Drivers of Migration Migrating Out of Poverty RPC
Working Paper No. 1, University of Sussex, Brighton
UN-HABITAT (2014). The State of African Cities 2014 Re-imagining sustainable urban transitions,
Zelinsky, Z (1971) The Hypothesis of the Mobility Transition. Geographical Review 61 (2) 219-249