|
|
Exceeds Expectations
|
Meets Expectations
|
Needs Some Revisions
|
Needs Significant Revisions
|
Missing
|
|
Introduction
Case summary and problem definition
|
The report clearly summarizes the case and identifies the problems mentioned in the Centerville Globe article.
(7 points)
|
The report summarizes the case but misses some minor points
(6 points)
|
The report either misses some important points in the case summary or misses important points regarding the problems in the Centerville Post article
(4 points)
|
The report misses the summary of the case and some important points regarding the problems the problems in the Centerville Post article
(2 points)
|
Missing many or all of the important points
(0 points)
|
|
Analysis of Culture
Building blocks of culture
|
The report identifies the building blocks of culture in the Maintenance division and discusses how they contribute to the faulty safety culture in the Maintenance division.
(6 points)
|
The report identifies almost all of the building blocks and discusses how they contribute to the culture but misses some minor points.
(5 points)
|
The report does not identify some important building blocks or does not explain how they contribute to the culture in the Maintenance division
(4 points)
|
The report does not identify several building blocks AND does not discuss how they contribute to the culture in the Maintenance division.
(2 points)
|
No analysis of the culture
(0 points)
|
|
The relationship between structure and culture
|
The report explains how factors such as budgets, positions as well as accountability mechanism shape the culture in the Maintenance division.
(6 points)
|
The report explains how structural factors and accountability mechanism shape the culture in the Maintenance division but misses some minor points.
(5 points)
|
The report explains how structural factors and accountability mechanism shape the culture in the Maintenance division but misses some major points.
(4 points)
|
The report misses several important points regarding how structural factors as and accountability mechanisms shape the culture in the Maintenance division.
(2 points)
|
No explanation regarding how structural factors and accountability mechanisms shape the culture in the Maintenance division.
(0 points)
|
|
Micro cultures
|
The report discusses the structural factors contributing to formation of micro cultures in the Express Transit. The report makes strong arguments.
(6 points)
|
The report discusses the structural factors contributing to formation of micro cultures in the Express Transit. The arguments that report makes have weaknesses.
(5 points)
|
The report discusses the structural factors contributing to formation of micro cultures in the Express Transit. Its arguments are weak or incomplete.
(4 points)
|
The report discusses the structural factors contributing to formation of micro cultures in the Express Transit. There is no argument made to back the discussion.
(2 points)
|
The report does not make any discussion regarding the structural factors contributing to formation of micro cultures.
(0 points)
|
|
Recommendations
|
The report makes recommendations to Jiles to address the cultural problems in the Maintenance division.
It makes complete arguments to support the recommendations.
It uses course materials in recommendations.
(6 points)
|
The report makes recommendations to Jiles.
It makes arguments to support recommendations either recommendations have some weaknesses or does not use course materials completely.
(5 points)
|
The report makes recommendations to Jiles.
&
The recommendation is weakly linked to the evaluation of the reorganization decision (4 points)
|
The report does not adequately address a problem.
&
The recommendation
is not linked to the evaluation of the reorganization decision.
(2 points)
|
No meaningful recommendation
Or the recommendation does not make sense.
(0 points)
|
|
Mechanics
|
The report is professionally prepared. It is free of grammatical errors and typos. Formatting is good.
(4 points)
|
The report is professionally prepared.
It has some grammatical errors or typos. Formatting is good.
(3 points)
|
The report is professionally prepared.
It has major errors in grammar, spelling, or formatting.
(2 points)
|
|
The report fails to meet professional writing standards.
(0 points)
|
nealtwicelove
PADM5389AnalyticalRubricCase2-ExpressTransit.docx
0
