Public Administrator Generated Information on Economic Development

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content

(70%)

Advanced

92-100%

Proficient

84-91%

Developing

1-83%

Not Present

Total

Assignment Requirements

18.5 to 20 points:

In following the instructions for the assignment option chosen, the student carefully executed each component of the option chosen, finding out the status of the jurisdiction and itemizing the determining factors for current conditions.

16.5 to 18 points:

Followed the instructions for the assignment option chosen.

1 to 16 points:

Followed most of the instructions for the assignment option chosen

0 points

Not present

Professionalism and Preparedness for Chosen Option

23 to 25 points:

Demonstrates professionalism by either:

· Option #1 – Public Administrator Interviews: Demonstrates preparedness to discuss the question responses/topic, having successfully met all requirements of interviewing 2 public administrators to secure economic development related information. Granting the interviewer maximum opportunity to explain conditions and to do so with minimum interruption.

· Option #2 – Data Analytic Assessment of Economic Development Activity for Selected Jurisdiction: The substantive data collection performance exhibits the professional content and quality of information required for the audio embedded PowerPoint presentation, relying on key statistical data sources for economic indicators:

· Option #3 – Integrated Qualitative (Public Administrator Interview Generated Information) with Select Quantitative (Data Analytic Indicators) of Economic Development Activity: Collected and then successfully presented the required data visually, incorporating audio embedded PowerPoint.

And, in doing so, identified the network of stakeholders and the data upon which they rely to determine the effectiveness of economic development activity.

21 to 22.5 points:

Demonstrates professionalism by either:

· Option #1 – Public Administrator Interviews: Demonstrates preparedness to discuss the question responses/topic, having successfully met all requirements of interviewing 2 public administrators to secure economic development related information.

· Option #2 – Data Analytic Assessment of Economic Development Activity for Selected Jurisdiction: The substantive data collection performance exhibits the professional content and quality of information required for the audio embedded PowerPoint presentation.

· Option #3 – Integrated Qualitative (Public Administrator Interview Generated Information) with Select Quantitative (Data Analytic Indicators) of Economic Development Activity: Collected and then successfully presented the required data visually, incorporating audio embedded PowerPoint.

1 to 20.5 points:

Seems mostly prepared but lacks professionalism by either:

· Option #1 – Public Administrator Interviews: The student is heard well enough on the recordings to discern his/her preparedness, having presented all recorded interviews as audio files with a time gauge of question responses; but, the bio/summary is unorganized and/or the student conducted only 1 of the 2 interviews required for the completion of this assignment.

· Option #2 – Data Analytic Assessment of Economic Development Activity for Selected Jurisdiction: The substantive data collection omits a few significant elements required for presentation in an audio embedded PowerPoint.

· Option #3 – Integrated Qualitative (Public Administrator Interview Generated Information) with Select Quantitative (Data Analytic Indicators) of Economic Development Activity: Partially collected and then presented the data visually, incorporating audio embedded PowerPoint.

0 points

Not present

Knowledge of Economic Development

23 to 25 points:

Student generates a summary narrative of the information gathered that addresses in detail key variables uniquely associated with economic development for the jurisdiction.

21 to 22.5 points:

The product indicates that the student demonstrates understanding of the information generated for decision making in community economic development

1 to 20.5 points:

The product indicates a partial understanding of the information generated for decision making in community economic development

0 points

Not present

Structure

(30%)

Advanced

92-100%

Proficient

84-91%

Developing

1-83%

Not present

Total

PowerPoint Display

13.5 to 15 points:

Audio-Visual fully supports the information obtained.

12.5 to 13 points:

Audio-Visual offers some information or covers a wide array without analysis

1 to 12 points:

Audio-Visual lacks some key information or lacks analysis

0 points

Not present

References

13.5 to 15 points:

All key sources of information are listed on the final slide of the PowerPoint. References conform to APA style.

12.5 to 13 points:

Most key sources of information are listed on the final slide of the PowerPoint. References conform to APA style

1 to 12 points:

Only a few key sources of information are listed on the final slide of the PowerPoint. APA style minimally applied

0 points

Not present

Professor Comments:

Total:

/100